93
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by rikudou@lemmings.world to c/autotldr@lemmings.world

Lately people have been telling me that they don't like the quality of the bot, so I've decided to disable it.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 65 points 3 months ago

I'm sorry to see it go.
I was often piqued to read it - sometimes it was fair-->good+ , sometimes it wasn't; occasionally it bombed. But it was free, it was a wip, it was inspired work, and it's far better than mine (nonexistant)!

I thank you.

[-] rikudou@lemmings.world 32 points 3 months ago

Thanks for the kind words!

I rather liked it myself (why create it otherwise), but I'm not gonna spam the whole Lemmy if people don't like it.

The code is still open source, just archived, so anyone can pick it up if they want.

[-] Baku@aussie.zone 2 points 3 months ago

I'm a little late, but I was just realising I hadn't heard from the bot and was wondering what happened to it. I'm sad to see it go, although I do understand why.

If you decide to bring it back, perhaps a system where it deletes its comment once downvoted below -1. I think the Reddit bot did that. That way there's a mechanism to remove inaccurate comments. I can't remember if the bot already had something like this, but if it didn't, perhaps a user, community, and instance opt out system could be implemented. I think if iirc, the previous system was basically "if you don't like it, just ban the bot" (although I may be getting mixed up with other bots. That sort of approach often makes some people upset as they may see it as unsolicited spam with no proper opt out system.

In any case, I don't think this will be the end for AutoTLDR (or a derivative), and I'm keen to see what other projects you come out with!

Thanks for running the bot for so long, most of us appreciate it♥️

[-] DigitalNirvana@lemm.ee 29 points 3 months ago

People tend to complain more than compliment. It wasn’t perfect, but it was a pretty useful tool.

[-] HaleHirsute@infosec.pub 25 points 3 months ago

What I thought the auto tldr was awesome and read them all the time. Please reconsider

[-] TisI@reddthat.com 22 points 3 months ago

Yeah, I was always glad to see it whenever an article piqued my interest. Thank you for your work, and hope you reconsider.

As someone else suggested, tell people who don't like it to block it.

[-] pelya@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

Hey, I liked it! Except for that one nasty bug where it discarded about half of the article text. I'd like to see it back, but without the TLDR part. Just the full article please. It's way more comfortable than opening a separate webpage and waiting for all ads and paywall prompts to load.

[-] CluckN@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

It did pretty good. Some journalists would fill their article with so much useless information that the bot would unfortunately miss the two relevant sentences.

[-] satanmat@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

Too bad. I thought it was good. Thank you though.

[-] HaleHirsute@infosec.pub 14 points 3 months ago

What I thought the auto tldr was awesome and read them all the time. Please reconsider

[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 14 points 3 months ago

Bummer. I guess I should have said thank you more often. Thanks for running it for as long as you did!

[-] Iceblade02@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

I have definitrly been reading autoTLDR and will be sad to see it go. Hope you reconsider!

[-] Whitebrow@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

I liked it since it allowed me to avoid clicking on the articles themselves.

[-] nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz 11 points 3 months ago

I liked it. Thanks for your work.

[-] Benjaben@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Just adding to the "maybe reconsider?" comments. I found it useful and I think it's trivially easy for annoyed users to simply block it. Why should their laziness remove something many of us like? Idk, maybe allow each magazine's (community's?) mods to decide for their specific magazine/community? That would be a lot of effort though, probably.

Whatever you choose to do, cool tool and thank you :)

[-] moistclump@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Another voice to say I really liked it and appreciated it. But I understand feeling discouraged by some people’s comments, it suck to feel unappreciated when you did a cool helpful thing. Hope you reconsider but I certainly don’t hold it against you!!!

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

I blocked it long ago. It was just not good.

[-] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago

I wish more people did this instead of complaining so much it got disabled

[-] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

I don't think your comment deserves 20 downvotes. You did not find utility in the bot, and you took an action which affected only yourself. That seems like the perfect solution. Each person can customize Lemmy experience to their needs.

[-] muzzle@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Noooooo! It was great most of the time and still worth a laugh when not.

Would you consider enabling it on request? If someone mentions it in a post or a comment it could reply with a summary.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

I liked it!

It was clear what & how it did it, and it was great.
I don't think anyone seriously interested in the posts subject would fully rely on tl;dr alone of any kind.
It was a free preview that delivered way beyond that.

It also helped lower the plague of ads being spread with some extra ady pages, as well as deliver content when the links were down.

... and I always upvoted the bot. Good bot.

[-] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

+1 comment for "please reconsider".

The bot isn't perfect, but it does provide some utility, and is easy to block if one doesn't find it useful.

[-] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago

Is there any chance of bringing it back?

[-] rikudou@lemmings.world 2 points 1 month ago

Not likely, it costs money to run it and I was often getting messages about it sucking and whatnot. It doesn't cost much, but paying for something and then listening how shitty it is kinda lost its appeal.

[-] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

Completely fair, I will miss it

this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
93 points (100.0% liked)

AutoTL;DR support

100 readers
1 users here now

The official community for the bot @autotldr@lemmings.world.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS