460

From the author: My next book is The Internet Con: How to Seize the Means of Computation: it's a Big Tech disassembly manual that explains how to disenshittify the web and bring back the old good internet. The hardcover comes from Verso on Sept 5, but the audiobook comes from me – because Amazon refuses to sell my audio.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago

Should note that it's not Amazon that doesn't want to carry the book, it's the author hot having them carry it. The headline makes it sound way more antagonistic than the reality is, it's just one author choosing not to publish on Amazon. As they are free to do.

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 66 points 1 year ago

Amazon choosing not to sell it without DRM is Amazon refusing to sell. They are free to do so, but they are the one refusing and not the author.

[-] just_change_it@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

That's like saying someone wants to publish an app on the iOS app store but the 30% cut and forced DRM prevents them. It's just a choice.

Given that Amazon does digital distribution of some items you could probably list it on the site and just have them give "digital access" to the ebook files. I've never gone through the process but i'd be quite surprised if this wasn't possible, though it may not show up in the books section of amazon this way.

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago

Choosing not to sell through Amazon because of the 30% cut is a completely different thing than Amazon requiring that the product be changed to add DRM.

They have a platform and process for selling digital access to audiobooks and ebooks. Selling access to that type of content in an way that circumvents those DRM requirements is against their Terms of Service.

[-] bobo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

True. But it still amounts to them refusing to sell his audio. If you want to be pedantic, Amazon doesn't sell ebooks or audiobooks at all. They sell licenses to access the content. You can argue that Doctorow should be saying that he refuses to market his content in accordance with their policies. But I'm in favor of him framing it this way. It underscores who the real shitheels are here.

[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

You're leaving out the context.

[-] SpunkyBarnes@geddit.social 67 points 1 year ago

Amazon requires DRM, which Doctorow considers anathema. Since the author won’t allow DRM on his works, Amazon refuses to sell them.

In fact, the author, in order to be found in Audible search results, penned an essay explaining how Audible rips off writers and readers. It's called "Why None of My Audiobooks Are For Sale on Audible".

You can read via the link following:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/07/25/can-you-hear-me-now/#acx-ripoff

[-] mPony@kbin.social 36 points 1 year ago

Cory has his principles and he stands by them: I respect him for that. Selling out is certainly much easier, and probably more lucrative.
Plus he's an author that actually responds to emails.

[-] potterpockets@sh.itjust.works 57 points 1 year ago

Tangental but somewhat related, one of the most popular modern fantasy authors (Brandon Sanderson) recently did something similar where he released/is releasing 4 books this year funded via Kickstarter due to not wanting to work with Amazon.

It actually currently holds the record for highest funded Kickstarter project ever. Granted, it helps if you are an established and popular author already, but id be curious to see if this trend expands.

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I hate that its Kickstarter though.

Yeah, he sells it really well. "Stick it to the man, down with Amazon". Sorry, but you're one of the biggest authors around, you do not need some common schmuck barely making it through their monthly fees to carry your business risk. You can have ~any publisher you want in the world, and trivially have them release that book not on Amazon if you wanted to.

And that's sadly the same in board gaming Kickstarters. Sure, the tiny mom&pop games that could never happen outside of Kickstarter exist. But the vast majority is big names and publishers using it to offload their business risk onto the consumer so they can have 0% risk 100% reward.

If the "I just want to get back at Amazon"-statement had truth behind it, the book would be sold independently. But not kickstartered. Shoulder the business cost in creating the product, then make the profit selling it.

[-] Pheonixdown@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

The Kickstarter wasn't just selling "the book", it sold four things (we'll get back to this) and wasn't trying to "get back at Amazon". I believe the Kickstarter was an appropriate option, even without considering his inability to independently bankroll the final scope of the project.

The four things:

  1. A Premium Hardcover of the novels. This is the first time that the initial print version of one of his novels was released as a Premium Hardcover (albeit they did glue the binding), demand was very much not predictable and using KS helped to ensure everyone who wanted the limited print hardcover could get one (over 90k of each were needed).

  2. DRM-free ebook of the novels. This was entirely risk-free for the consumer, they already essentially existed. This was essentially a pre-order, it is really only justified on KS because of #1.

  3. Audiobook of the novel. Similar to #2, however I guess there was some minor consumer risk in that the audio needed to be recorded still, but Brandon does have reliable narrators and though he tried and failed at getting special narrators, that wasn't part of the pitch.

  4. Swag Boxes. This is the biggest item type to justify KS usage, they needed tools like they get from KS to be able to properly manage the monthly subscription box fulfillment. This did have some consumer risk, because it isn't what they normally do, Sanderson couldn't bank roll it himself (even after the $40M Kickstarter, he's only got a 6M$ net worth) and it was largely an unknown in the book publishing space.

Back to the Amazon bit, it wasn't a selling point to the KS, Amazon isn't mentioned at all. He did decide to support competition in the Audiobook space as part of his fulfillment. In fact, all 4 of the novels are available on Amazon as print and ebooks, published through deals with his traditional publishers.

The way in which he decided to sell these novels (bundled content types and subscriptions) wasn't something his traditional publishers were agreeable to and the KS was used as a proof of concept for that.

The KS raised $41M dollars, it's the largest KS campaign ever by double. There's a 0% chance the project would have been any where near remotely successful (and enjoyed by fans) if he'd tried to deliver it in a more traditional way. He didn't have support of his publishers for that, he couldn't afford it himself and the only other option would be a business loan, which we don't know if he could have received a large enough one. Regardless of funding, the demand smashed expectations, less people would have got what they wanted in a traditional purchase method.

Yeah, there are bad board game companies on KS, take your complaints up with them. Which reminds me, I need to see when my physical edition pledge of Z from 2013 is due...

[-] TheActualDevil@sffa.community 11 points 1 year ago

I mean, he's aware of his popularity and privilege. He's made a few comments clarifying that it wasn't to "stick it to Amazon." He does have a problem with Amazon's business model when it comes to authors as well as the traditional publishing industry's barriers to new authors and he understands that these are people's only real option. He used that clout he has in the industry and his fiscal security to try help open up other avenues for publishing. And yeah, the guy is rich, but not publishing house rich. Printing thousands of books, then distributing them likely takes more liquid cash than he has available. He had a good idea of what it would cost and that's what was asked for on Kickstarter. If he hadn't made that, all the people would have kept their money. If more money was needed, he is rich and could probably cover it. I don't see any risk here that anyone shouldered except for him risking his goodwill with fans.

I try to be skeptical of people. Particularly successful people who have made a lot of money. But from everything I've seen, the man lives his values and seems to be a pretty good guy. For his Kickstarter books, when he was talking to Audible about the audiobook versions, they offered him a very good deal. Then he pushed them to tell what a typical author would get. When he heard how bad a deal that was, he refused.

The man really cares about books and their place in this world. He has been successful and made a lot of money and social power in the industry from decades of writing. Now he's using that to try and make the industry a better place for all writers while also still getting his books to his fans.

And my understanding is that his employees at Dragonsteel have profit sharing as part of their working there, on top of their paychecks. So any money he makes is also distributed throughout the staff. He also seems pretty liberal for a member of the LDS church and has spoken about his views evolving over the years as he's realized the reality around him. He seems like a pretty genuinely good guy doing his best to change the industry for the good of all writers.

[-] Snarwin@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

If you actually read the post, you'll see that there's no "business risk"—the entire audiobook is already recorded. He's just using Kickstarter as a platform to sell pre-orders.

[-] Squids@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

It's a trend that's popping up in quite a few places - it also happens in 3d printing. Some of the biggest companies out there still do kickstarters for their more risky products under the guise of "trying to figure out demand"

Creality you're like the name in entry level 3d printers and people have been clamouring for you to release a new product for years. I'm pretty damn sure you can afford to take a risk on a concept that people have been wanting for years.

[-] picandocodigo@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I hope the trend grows. Amazon needs to be abolished, divided, whatever it takes to destroy their monopoly.

[-] LostCause@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thank you a lot for sharing! Since he’s the guy who coined Enshittification, I‘m curious to read what his solutions would be in more detail.

[-] efrique@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I expect a lot more authors will go this (crowdfunding) route; if Kelsey Dionne can get over $1.3 million for a fairly niche TTRPG product (albeit that it was a very well done example of its particular niche), publishing straight up fiction books via crowdfunding has to look pretty damn attractive.

(edit: added a missing word)

[-] EatMyDick@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I just want to gag reading the synopsis. You people are delusional. Yeah platforms are successful because of a lack of interoperability 👌👍🤣

[-] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago

Obvious troll is obvious.

Yes, that is how monopolies function, Señor EatMyDick.

[-] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

OMG “Señor” just cracked me up! Thanks for the chuckle. :)

[-] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago

Honest question, what exactly brings you to the fediverse? and if not walled gardens and monopoly, what is wrong with, say, reddit?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
460 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59227 readers
2480 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS