392

cross-posted from: https://yall.theatl.social/post/3229309

From the Atlanta Daily World:

In a surprising yet increasingly common move, Microsoft has quietly dismantled its team dedicated to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI).  The decision, communicated via email to the affected employees on July 1, cited “changing business needs” as the reason for the layoffs. While the exact number of employees impacted remains unclear, the team’s lead didn’t … Continued

The post Microsoft Says Bye-Bye DEI, Joins Growing List Of Corporations Dismantling Diversity Teams appeared first on Atlanta Daily World.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 194 points 7 months ago

Everything a corporation does that's not outright trying to fuck you out of your time or money is 100% a scam they're trying to pull to convince you they care.

I really wish people would stop falling for it, because, well, there's never going to be real progress made unless there's the force of law behind things like DEI.

[-] bizarroland@fedia.io 44 points 7 months ago

I mean the entire purpose of a dei group in a company is to make sure that the company isn't doing things that will get them fucking sued into the ground, like choosing to only hire young white males for instance.

If they want to disband this group fine, just that's going to be exhibit A in all of the lawsuits.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 37 points 7 months ago

You mean the lawsuits that will be tossed out by the totally not corrupt upstanding officials at the "Supreme" Court?

[-] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 13 points 7 months ago

By the supreme absolute and totally incorruptible court of Trumpistan?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 13 points 7 months ago

An assessment test I did for a job recently was essentially just an SAT and IQ test. None of it had to do with the position but it was a quick way for them to say "no foreigners."

[-] glowie@h4x0r.host 29 points 7 months ago

If they brag about DEI on marketing pages... That's all the initiative is for. Virtue signalling for sales.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 24 points 7 months ago

I dunno. I'm a believer that there is real benefit to diverse teams and there is some evidence in support of this. Seems like a diverse team could really help a company figure out how to keep fucking the money out of you harder.

[-] TheOneCurly@lemm.ee 17 points 7 months ago

Doing good work takes time to make money, execs need those quarterly bonuses right now. Much easier to do a bunch of layoffs and get that line up now.

[-] greenskye@lemm.ee 13 points 7 months ago

Which is ultimately the biggest reason companies suck so much worse now than they used to. Over a long enough time frame profit isn't the worst way to steer an organization. Negative actions have repercussions and companies used to avoid those.

But investors shortened the time frame so that everything and anyone is disposable. We have a handful of rich people hollowing out pretty much all companies in America and stripping them of value as fast as possible. We're destroying our economic base in a fire sale for like 9 people.

[-] namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev 12 points 7 months ago

I dunno. I’m a believer that there is real benefit to diverse teams and there is some evidence in support of this.

You're 100% right! But good luck convincing the bean counters.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The company I work for is tireless about DEI and at least the CEO is personally a big believer. I think the instant he goes, though, the entire thing goes. We have hundreds of people working on it. And they have produced more backlash against DEI than real progress on it. So yeah, there are true believers out there, but the system as a whole doesn’t give a fuck, never did, and there’s never going to come a time when we all turn some corner and want more, more, more DEI staff at work. In my humble opinion the movement is dead already and will be remembered as an artifact of the last decade or so. The actual problem itself will continue to improve, generationally, just as it has done for a hundred years.

[-] wagoner@infosec.pub 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

That generational improvement is not the natural order of the universe. It's the result of individuals putting themselves in harms way to push for change. It's hard-fought legislation moving the cause forward. It's constitutional amendments. It's legal cases won against the odds. It's corporations jumping on the bandwagon not wanting to be seen to oppose respectable society.

But those who have always fought against the process are racking up wins. That generational change you've observed that looked inevitable is under severe threat. You cannot count on it happening by itself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 18 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Well yeah. The point of a corp is to make a profit. By any means necessary. They are even legally compelled to do so. They are not here to serve us. They are here to take your money. Sometimes even backing you into a corner to force you to do it.

I just got done watching Fallout and I fully believe our corporations would do the same as the ones in the series given the chance.

Edit: after some research and the person below me informing me, I was mistaken about the legal requirement.

[-] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 26 points 7 months ago

Minor niggle: they're legally compelled to work in the best interests of the shareholders which is usually but not always seeking profit at all costs.

But, in general, I don't disagree, I merely was mentioning that people keep getting suckered by pretty words and meaningless promises of change and then not bothering to make it have actual legal requirements behind it.

The mistake is looking at a CEO going Trust Me Bro, and trusting them. See: frog and scorpion story.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

They are not legally compelled to do so. That's a nonsense myth, even for publicly traded companies.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] daniyeg@lemmy.ml 186 points 7 months ago

companies experimented with appearing more "socially conscious", waited for a bit, saw it didn't generate any extra revenue for them, then axed it to appear more profitable.

capital has gotten really dumb, and if you think any one of these really gave a shit about diversity, you might be dumber.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 55 points 7 months ago

I think there's that and there's also the growing cancel culture of the right. They're boycotting anything and everything that even smells of equity/diversity. Repugnicans have proved that they can affect businesses and will do so with their army of right wing media viewers so it makes sense that corporations would cater to them.

The left has their grassroots movements, but there is no major media outlet that convinces others to join in on the boycotts. They might report it's happening, but they don't go all Sean Hannity with some version of "they're taking your job prospects and giving it to some undeserving lazy _____ person because they're the real racists and they hate you!"

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This is kind of the thing.

Having DEI committees is now one of several symbols of the political ideologies of a company and its "senior leadership".

For both sides, I think a lot of people (or at least those that have the privilege of choosing where they work) do not want to work for a company that directly conflicts with their political leanings.

A far left worker who sees their employer axing their DEI programs could see that as a symbol that the company is swinging hard to the right, and may adapt more conservative practices that may effect them directly. See: Hobby Lobby trying to block their health insurance from covering birth control.

Likewise, a far right worker who sees their employer adopting a leftist program like DEI might start to get concerned that their employer may also start swinging more to the left and adopt progressive practices that might impact them directly. Like paying them a living wage, providing all the PPE they could ever need, or hiring a queer person.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Cyberjin@lemmy.world 30 points 7 months ago

Good example is doing pride month, where companies changes their profile picture and so on. They have branches around the world, and some won't do anything, like the middle east. Money talks and companies doesn't give a damn.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 85 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Almost as if it was a bullshit endeavor all along, just corporate marketing. Those departments are never given the funding or staff required to enact functional change within organizations. Unionize, folks!

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 44 points 7 months ago

Their main function was to avoid lawsuits, like the rest of HR. I feel like these companies forgot that they were all sued because they discriminated against women and non-white applicants and employees. This is just going to make it easier to prove discrimination in court.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

This is a reflection of them anticipating that discrimination lawsuits will no longer be a thing under a Project 2025 Trump dictatorship.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

Rather than thinking of it as a cynical farce that was a total lie, can we think of it as perhaps a genuine impulse which was not strong enough to override other business considerations, and which most companies fumbled, and which no company was willing to make material sacrifices for when it came right down to it. I genuinely think a lot of people would like to see true equity at work, but they have no idea how to bring it about, they are too outmatched by other cultural forces, and ultimately they can’t make a convincing business justification for it.

I call it a well-intentioned but doomed escapade. Not a big fat lie.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 66 points 7 months ago

DEI is like Agile. There’s a right way and a wrong way to do it.

The wrong way is profitable for consultants and easy for the company, so that is what gets implemented in most cases.

The right way requires actual buy-in from C-staff down and needs constant work and adjustment to the specific company. There is no one size fits all solution. More work, less money. Very few companies do this.

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 35 points 7 months ago

This is part of Leonard Leo's plan to re-mccarthy-ize US society and purge anyone left of fascist, same way he orchestrated the right wing take over of our courts.

[-] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
[-] radivojevic@discuss.online 32 points 7 months ago
[-] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml 20 points 7 months ago

We should nationalize them and open source all their proprietary code.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Dismantle, destroy, whatever. Seconded.

[-] 800XL@lemmy.world 29 points 7 months ago

Companies are stopping because the orange clown supreme court ruled that racists, sexists and bigots could sue companies for not allowing them to hate.

[-] TommySoda@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago

Honestly I haven't heard any good news about Microsoft in like 10 years. They just keep making awful decisions.

[-] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 29 points 7 months ago

Microsoft is usually a very big player when it comes enabling disabled people to do things they normally couldnt (e. g hands free keyboards, alternative game controllers.) VS Code is also one of the most popular code editors on the market.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

It’s like 25 for me. How to half-ass your way atop other’s work to monopolize a new economy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] notanaltaccount@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

In the future there will probably white people suing for racism based on the existence of dei and the courts are now so racist those lawsuits will be allowed because the same territories that fought for slave ownership during rhe civil war have political leverage via republicans

Dei is now a legal liability instead of protecting against lawsuits. Many companies that are laying off people cant justify keeping dei in that environment when they are laying off people that do work that is closely aligned with the business. Laying off a senior programmer but keeping dei seems a bit unfair and since dei could be a liability why keep it?

There was also pressure to hire more black people in business back in covid times and post-covid and companies did that, with data showing it probably impacted other races getting hired. It's risky for them to keep doing that and likely expensive. Dei was also keeping more data allowing them to get sued to more easily either way. Many employees complained about dei and that it was all for show even when the expense was there.

Its also became synonymous with woke and republicans hate the term. Conpanies only do what the prevailing political winds say so they can fit in with legal compliance enough to keep profiting. They don't care and are mostly an illusion of a logo with greedy people worshipping money behind the veneer.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 11 points 7 months ago

Kinda glad, as a gamer I'm tired of DEI telling me I can't have a steak because a baby can't chew it.

I'm all for more diversity and inclusion, but there's a right way and a wrong way to do it, how DEI was being used in the gaming industry was definitely the wrong way.

[-] petrol_sniff_king 36 points 7 months ago

What steaks are you being denied? I don't understand.

[-] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago

You know what he wants. An all white video game

[-] petrol_sniff_king 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Hey, hey, hold on. I looked at their comment history, I don't think that necessarily.

I mean, it's possible, but I'm trying to be charitable here.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 11 points 7 months ago

Remasters that remove characters or stages because they're "problematic content", redesigns of familiar characters that remove their sex appeal because feminity in and of itself is somehow misogynistic (seriously I'm a lady just wants to play a beautiful woman in my escapist fantasies, ya know cause it's MY fantasy and we all wanna be more attractive?), risque humor no longer being allowed, localizations that remove or change dialogue seen as sexist (Even if it's villain dialogue, or done to show that a specific character has flaws that include outdated views), the terms "Male and Female" are now "Body Type A" and "Body Type B" (Look I'm trans, non-binary identity is more common, I get it... but... this feels more patronizing than inclusive...)

Lots of shit like that.... and as a gamer it is quite frankly embarrassing. Games are a form of art, and we should not apologize for art.

Btw, I know the Body Type A/B thing sounds pedantic, but it really just feels like trying too hard yet not hard enough.. If it's really too offensive to just have a drop down menu that says "MALE or FEMALE" in current year, just have a character creator that lets me pick masculine/feminine/androgynous traits from menus and ask for my pronouns at the end. That'd be a much better solution (and was fucking awesome when Cyberpunk 2077 did it)

A lot of games are very lazy and have two body types, an overly masculine buff guy (A) and a curvaceous lady (B), then ask if you want to be referred to as "He, She, or They", while I understand They (Non-Binary individuals exist), can someone tell me who the fuck outside of a Right Wing troll trying (and failing) to be funny is going to pick the buff guy + the "she/her" pronouns?

It's just one of those situations where I just wanna say "Your attempt at inclusion is so poor, I'd rather you just call me a slur at this point."

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 7 months ago

What you're complaining about sounds like the symptom of the lack of a DEI team where companies just apply diversity bandaids instead of hiring professionals.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 7 months ago

That's not really the fault of DEI, although I share your feelings on the matter. I feel like corporate media has just become a smooth, grey blob of whatever is determined to appeal to the widest audience of people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

This is the first time I hear about DEI. I see and understand the acronym as something I should search on a popular search engine that is not the one that starts with a g. As such, I've been working for 30 years and I'm perplexed by something I have no clue about which might possibly apply to me as a LGBTQA minority person. But first things first, let's all go figure out what this acronym means.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] xenomor@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Anything that corporations do, that isn’t directly oriented toward revenue generation, is window dressing, marketing, and bullshit. They don’t actually care about addressing social ailments like inequity, they don’t care about environmental destruction. While individuals within these organizations may believe in these causes, the machine itself is just lying when they parade these initiatives out. They don’t care about their workforce (beyond maintaining functionality), and they certainly don’t care about their society. If these corporations were people, they’d be considered sociopaths, with ZERO exceptions.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
392 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

63186 readers
2875 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS