162
submitted 1 year ago by Emperor@feddit.uk to c/london@feddit.uk
all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

Wow, they chose the more expensive and more gentle way to do it? I wonder if there was a design committee that made them or it was just a love of architecture.

[-] phuntis@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

I don't know for certain in this case but almost certainly legal there's a bunch of sightlines in london that are protected and you aren't allowed to block them

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's incredibly interesting, rules makes for wild and creative solutions.

Edit: Unless it's an HOA, lol. They fine you for being creative.

[-] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

The article didn't talk about it being required but more of a benevolence. There were certainly examples of required lines of sight, specifically old St. Paul's, however

this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
162 points (100.0% liked)

London

1250 readers
1 users here now

"who’d a thunk it"

For discussion about London including the surrounding Greater London area. Discuss all things from news, travel, culture, and general life around the capital and largest city of England!

Rules and other welcoming info can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS