471
submitted 2 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MehBlah@lemmy.world 193 points 2 months ago

Can you imagine being so ignorant that you seek to ban masks.

[-] EndOfLine@lemmy.world 94 points 2 months ago

The considered ban on masks was for protesters.

The idea of not allowing anonymity for protesters has its origins in combating racial violence and the KKK. Klan members suddenly lost a lot of their motivation to assemble in public, once they had to show their faces, those that did were less likely to commit illegal acts and the ones that did break the law were more likely to face legal reprocutions.

The contemplated ban on masks for protesters in Los Angeles was considered following increased violence by masked protesters and was not motivated by covid denial.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 50 points 2 months ago

We weren't living in a world with cameras everywhere when the KKK needed to be attacked so vigorously. Times have changed and things should be updated. Especially in a world where bigots are fine marching without masks (see Charlottesville).

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

But, if a protester has covid...?

[-] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

They haven't thought that far yet 🤔

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

This just in: more than a single factor can exist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MehBlah@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

Sure, a environment guaranteed to enable the rapid spread of any transmissible disease. I bet this ban wouldn't apply to MAGA since they are not protesters. Just concerned citizens with hateful banners and firearms.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 58 points 2 months ago

People need to stop stereotyping cities as liberal havens.

[-] CptEnder@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

LMFAO yeah see: NYC. Dude's pretty much a Republican in Democrat fur.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Well it suits a narrative when there are crime and poverty issues to be exploited for publicity and political gain.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 41 points 2 months ago

Ah, sweet sweet karma. Unfortunately modern medicine for an Important Person with lots of money will limit its reach, but I hope she has a really unpleasant reaction to the antivirals.

This is notably the woman who, in response to a protest of West Bank land sales that was understaffed by the police said the answer is not to boost police presence at contentious protests, but just to do what she wanted to do already, have more police patrols.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yet another misleading article from u/return2ozma.
The mask ban was for protesters, and has nothing to do with Covid.

[-] ImADifferentBird 40 points 2 months ago

Because everyone knows Covid can't spread at protests.

[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

It's about responding to somewhat opposing public safety concerns. As someone else pointed out in this thread, when protestors are allowed to wear masks they are more likely to commit illegal acts, even violent ones. SARS-CoV-2 is no longer a novel virus. There is now significant immunity in the population and our COVID treatments are much improved, meaning the virus no longer constitutes a public health emergency.

[-] Samvega 39 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Rule 4:

  1. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

The post title is the same as as the article title. As of right now, article title is: Los Angeles’s Mayor Was Contemplating a Mask Ban. She Just Got Covid.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I didn't say he changed it, but he links these kinds of misinforming stories all the time.
I originally wrote the article was misleading, but since they correct the misleading headline already in the first sentence, that wasn't really true.
So I changed it to the headline which is what is actually misleading.
But since this is misunderstood, I have now changed it back.

The fact of the matter is that u/return2ozma is flooding lemmy.world with misleading stories with misleading headlines, no matter how much they are the original headlines, they remain misleading. Those are often stories that in no way deserve to be spread.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

I have certainly criticized OP for posting things before, but I'm really not seeing the issue here with their actions. They posted an informative article that you just need to read to understand the headline... or just read the one-sentence preview if you click on the post to comment.

It isn't their fault that the headline is deceptive. It's a good article from what is normally a trustworthy outlet and it's pretty much your fault if you don't even bother to do the second of the two things I suggested.

[-] Samvega 21 points 2 months ago

"This is bad journalism because I don't like it!"

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

No it's because the headline is pandering a lie.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
471 points (100.0% liked)

News

22890 readers
3316 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS