309
submitted 1 year ago by nekandro@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Vaggumon@lemm.ee 100 points 1 year ago
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

here

Biden guarantees you Trump. Figure it out bub.

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Grunt4019@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

If Biden dies and his tombstone is running for president, I’d still vote for his tombstone over trump.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 76 points 1 year ago

You know it is pretty bad when a bunch of CNN commentators think he got smoked.

[-] tiefling 9 points 1 year ago

CNN got bought out by right wing media a little while ago iirc

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NeuronautML@lemmy.ml 75 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Trump would only win if the Democrat party found someone seemingly more inept than him.

I am impressed that the Democrat party managed to present not one, but two outstandingly incompetent candidates. In a row. That's some bottom of the barrel advanced scraping techniques right there. They even managed to get a representation of both sexes.

I'm sure Mr. Biden will be terribly distraught, as soon as he is able to understand what's happening around him at the moment.

[-] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The Democrats are still stuck in this post-Clinton seniority mindset where they unofficially pick a candidate before primaries even begin, based on who has been around the longest and who has held the highest position. Remember "it's her turn"? Yes, yes, I know it didn't work against Obama, but heading into the debates everyone assumed Hillary would be the candidate until Obama put on the better show. More to the point, I think Obama breaking through scared the establishment Dems into doubling down on primary fuckery. See what happened to Bernie, twice. So now we have a president who knows all the right people but plays politics with the 1990s rulebook and has a terminal case of crusty old man voice.

Still better than Trump.

[-] MarcoPOLO@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago

Obama has absolutely absurd charisma. He's the Democrat version of Trump - knows exactly what to say to his base and knows how to convince moderates he's not insane.

Clinton and Biden have the charisma of a limp noodle. Sanders has absurd charisma, but he's seen as too big of a threat to Democrat lobbyists and big corporations.

Sanders would've mopped the floor with Trump because he would've actually been able to grab the 18-44 demographic (which last saw peaks in 1992 Clinton/Gore and 2008 Obama/Biden, both to unseat a Republican and, coincidentally, a Bush).

Sanders would have been able to avoid the collapse in turnout from working-class Black people in 2016.

Sanders would've stopped the increasing right-wing radicalization of the youth of America, or provided a counterweight for left-wing economic radicalization.

The US federal elections are basically a pony show and the DNC doesn't know how to play the game without throwing out their playbook.

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

This is about a succinct of a deconstruction of the DNCs hand in this cycle as I’ve seen. They’re effectively Ned Stark

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Cube6392@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago

I do not understand how Elizabeth Warren didn't get more interest 4 years ago. She was clearly the best candidate and one who has the kind of broad appeal Bernie Sanders does. I think I'm at a point where my belief is that the bankers who are probably gonna vote Republican anyway who fund campaigns very explicitly don't want someone like Sanders or Warren to be president

[-] jprice@kbin.run 22 points 1 year ago

The Democratic establishment doesn’t want people who go after their donors. Mainly big banks, but also pharmaceutical and insurance companies which if you ask me all need to be reformed and heavily regulated and a lot of people need to go to prison for what they’ve done to the country over the past 24 years. But hey, who am I, just somebody who wants better for the country that doesn’t have to do with sucking rich cocks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Beastlygr@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No. We're "un-fucked".

We cant win with Biden.

We CAN win without him.

Finally the dense mother fuckers who have been denying Biden's inadequacy have been dragged, kicking and screaming, into reality.

We'll have a brokered convention (like all conventions before 1970's), we'll get "generic corporate democrat", and they'll be instantly polling in the low to mid 50's and we'll actually have a fucking chance.

Biden has had no chance at winning this election at any point in his candidacy. Ever. Look at the polling. Look at the data. He's never stood a chance and plenty of people here and elsewhere have been trying to get this through some extremely thick skulls that have basically been insisting that we need to run an un-electable candidate.

Well the goose is cooked. The rat is out of the bag. Here comes the moose or whatever. He's done. Adios Biden, don't let the door hit you on the way out. You did fine on some stuff but wow you fucked up on Gaza/Israel.

Minutes after that debate Newsom was on MSNBC. We're gonna get Newsom, or maybe Inslee; a way smarter choice would be Witmer or Andy Beshear.

And guess what? Litterally ANY GENERIC CANDIDATE PUTS 10 POINTS BACK ON THE BOARD.

Bam. Switch candidates and Democrats are instantaneously back in this race.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Good luck with Project 2025, because that's what third party voters are voting for.

We need to get rid of FPTP voting before a 2 party system can be derailed.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Are you like, actually touched?

We're talking about the Democratic nominee right now. Not any third party candidate.

[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Biden is the Democratic nominee. Sure it's not official until August 19-22 but unless he resigns, dies, or is otherwise fully incapacitated before then, he is the candidate who will be on the ballots in November. None of those possibilities seem likely.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] classic@fedia.io 22 points 1 year ago

Not only switch candidates, but have Biden have the humility to back that person. Do it in the name of Democracy, you know: this election is too important and I realize we need a stronger candidate than I can be. That would sell well, and that's what's needed for better or worse: a good narrative

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] xhieron@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

This probably doesn't work, and it's probably not as good idea as anyone hopes (genuinely or not). It might happen anyway, but no matter what, we're coasting toward a second Trump presidency, just like all the Russian agitprops here wanted all along.

If Biden is polling down 10 points or worse at the convention, they could drag someone else onto the stage, but my suspicion is that no one else outperforms him on short notice, even after his abysmal performance in the debate.

A few reasons:

  1. Newsom probably doesn't want it. If he calculates Trump wins either way (not unreasonable), he's not going to want that loss on his record since he's already gunning for 28. He would be the best chance at getting an up-and-comer who already has good name recognition and looks and sounds good.
  2. Harris. If Harris wants it, she has a lot of leverage to make it hard or outright impossible for the party to push anyone else out in front of her. She's a poor candidate for a lot of reasons, but she's also the most attached to Biden. That's both good and bad for her. If they want to run anyone else, they have to have her playing ball too. Ask yourself, if you were Kamala Harris, would you give up your only conceivable chance at the Oval in favor of another non-Biden candidate? Remember, in any scenario the odds are good Trump wins anyway.
  3. The truth may be that the party would rather just let Trump win. That sounds unthinkable, but this isn't a secret cabal of idealists we're talking about: it's a bunch of self-interested rich people who want to put themselves in power. Getting them to do anything for the public good is difficult under the best circumstances. They could easily decide--rightly--that Biden is still their best shot at beating Trump. That was the call in 2020, and it paid off. Don't forget that many of these same names being batted around now were active in the party four years ago. Newsom loses to Trump, and he's largely seen as the best alternative. If you're running the party and looking at those odds, you should run Biden if you actually want the best chance at winning. You might decide it's just a lost cause and start planning for a four year long nightmare.
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] concrete_baby@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

LOL. A lot of flowery language there but not much substance. The Dems can't switch now. Trump can instantly snatch on to that and attack whoever replaces Biden as an inferior desperate backup. Trump will say you Democrats have no idea what they're doing and they can't even stand behind their incumbent. This isn't only about 2024 but also about the midterms. Who would vote for a party that backstabs their incumbent?

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago

As bad as Biden was, CNN were worse. Fuck that shitty network for allowing Trump to lie pretty much nonstop for 90 minutes unchallenged.

[-] match@pawb.social 22 points 1 year ago

they gave both people plenty of time, biden is supposed to be capable of challenging on his own

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

I disagree. Trump indulged in a gish gallop of lies and bullshit. Biden spent too much time trying to refute some of it and in doing so wasted time which he could've used to make his own points.

There should've been moderation in place to stop this, there was none.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sndmn@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago

Certainly the "moderator" isn't expected to moderate the thing! /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It takes longer to debunk a lie than to say one. It's easy to spout out a hundred lies in two minutes, but it takes longer than that to debunk them without just saying "No, that's a lie" to every one, which also sounds dumb if Trump is saying that, too.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

And if Biden wasn't senile he would have been able to do that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

When Jon Stewart referred to Biden's expression as resting 25th amendment face. 💀

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

alarm bells?

wait they didn't know he was old before this debate?

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Apparently millions of people during the 2020 primaries didn't math long enough to realize Biden would be 86 years old after two terms.

[-] nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 year ago

I distinctly remember that before I left Reddit, I had some lovely discourse with someone who was absolutely inconsolable over my opinion that Biden was too old for the job. Got called ageist and everything else they could think of.

Trust me, I hate being right.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

What exactly is CNN trying to accomplish with this hit piece?

[-] Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml 52 points 1 year ago

You know, as much as one has to keep Machiavellian machinations and Realpolitik in mind.... Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. Biden did not do well. They report about it in a way that gives them clicks. There is no plan.

[-] nekandro@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 year ago

Calling a spade a spade is a hit piece now? Truly the least propagandized people on the planet.

[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In 2009, CNN's current CEO and chairman was called the 65th most powerful person in the world by Forbes.

I wonder if he'd have any financial incentive one way or the other?

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH

Oh my god. You've gaslit yourself into another dimension.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

...says the guy that thinks there's going to be a brokered convention that picks somebody other than Biden.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Bo7a@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

Check out who runs CNN now and all will become apparent.

[-] Sunforged@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

You think CNN cares who wins?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] xhieron@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Ratings and clicks--same thing they wanted with the debate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago

We told you back in November but no one listened.

[-] pumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

I'm European so obviously anti trump (I've learnt a lot about politicians that used similar rhetoric, had a different personal cult around them, also tried overthrowing the state - history repeats when not learning from it) but damn, Biden was bad. I'd still vote for Biden simply to avoid trump, but I fear he has no chance to get >50% after that performance.

The democrats hopefully see the writing on the wall and replace him before it's too late.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

It's over. It was honestly over long ago, it's just playing out in slow motion.

It will probably continue to play out for another thirty years at least. Increasingly horrible, so at any point "eight years ago" feels like back when things were sane, except we lost our minds decades ago already.

Sorry we're the nation equivalent of DJ Khaled; we think we're "suffering from success" but in truth we actually are and we don't know it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] forgotmylastusername@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

He was weak but they couldn't adjust his mic levels? That was weird.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

I'm more worried that he won't win the election rather than he will win it. I don't think the debate changes anything about that, people are likely still going to vote who they were going to vote for. He is the not Trump vote, and it's just as important as ever if not more important to vote not Trump.

[-] Auzy@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

It wasn't a great debate, but I've had a brainfart when talking too before.

Also, the policy is what matters. What matters is also that Biden obviously was doing the right thing. Just because he doesn't scream at people doesn't mean he's not a good choice still.

Whereas Trump was clearly obviously lying constantly

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

And he's still the better choice

Biden shared a stage tonight with the only man he can reasonably defeat in this election. I think I should announce my candidacy, I could run on a "my dick can get hard without pharmaceuticals" platform.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
309 points (100.0% liked)

World News

36743 readers
387 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS