227
submitted 6 months ago by KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

For those wanting to build a Wayland-only Linux desktop experience without carrying any aging X11 baggage, GNOME 47 will be able to optionally offer Wayland-only support without carrying X11/X.Org support. This Mutter merge request landed today that allows compiling Mutter with X11 support disabled. That landed today along with this GNOME Shell merge request for being able to disable X11 support too.

all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 76 points 6 months ago

This is great news. Shipping X11 on a system that doesn’t need it is a big waste.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 50 points 6 months ago

I love the fact that it's optional.

[-] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 36 points 6 months ago

I wonder how long it'll be possible to build Gnome with Xorg support. If I had to guess I'd say there won't be any support within the next 3 years, because keeping future Gnome working with Xorg is work nobody wants to put in.

That said, Xwayland will likely keep being around for the foreseeable future.

Out of curiosity, do you use Xorg and if yes, what's keeping you from using Wayland?

[-] wer2@lemm.ee 23 points 6 months ago

XOrg is my daily driver for these reasons:

  1. I mostly use XFCE, which doesn't have Wayland yet
  2. last time I tried Wayland (long time ago now on Gnomr), it was buggy and didn't work
  3. I don't change my setups that much, so I haven't tried it since
  4. I don't need the features Wayland offers/XOrg covers my use cases
  5. Wayland drama

That being said, I have no fundamental opposition to Wayland, and will probably use it someday.

[-] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 6 months ago

Those are all good reasons. XFCE aims to support Wayland with the next release, so if they choose to use an established compositor it shouldn't be too buggy.

With XFCE porting their apps over the setup shouldn't change much, unless you're using Xorg specific tools.

Over the last few years most features I'd expect from a windowing system were added to Wayland, so I expect the drama to cool down. (I don't even know what's still missing (except accessibility), with VRR, tearing, DRM leasing (VR), and global hotkeys being done. It's just apps like Discord that have to cave in under the pressure to fix their apps.)

Once everything works, there's no point talking about it.

@Furycd001@fosstodon.org

[-] wer2@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago

I totally expect one day a XFCE (Wayland) option will show up, I will click it, forget I did, and use it forever more.

@Chewy7324 @GolfNovemberUniform I'd say as soon as screen readers work properly under Wayland, they could drop X11 builds. But they should definitely not do it before fixing that.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I think that could be solved with a XDG portal

@possiblylinux127 That would definitely be part of it, I assume. Does Wayland already track text rendering and its contents?

Because somehow text from any UI would need to be detected.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 months ago

The actual implementation would be per desktop. The desktop draws to the screen and then the apps connect to the desktop. We already have a window capture XDG portal that is used by things like OBS. We could huild a simular portal for just text on the screen. We would just need some way of either recognizing text or even better some sort of image to text engine like what is in Firefox.

[-] princessnorah 1 points 6 months ago

Are you saying to use an image to text engine just for what are text fields in applications? That sounds horribly inefficient...

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago

It would work for images as well. It doesn't need to be exclusively used but sometimes text is rendered at a pixel level.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago

I switched to Wayland after GNOME 46 release because it fixed the issues I had with it (artifacts and persistent display failures). Many people may still prefer X11 at least because of the lack of input latency on slow machines.

[-] Nisaea@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Not op but we do magic cookie shenanigans at work to run a graphic app as another user. I believe that's not a thing in Wayland.

[-] D_Air1@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Not OP, but I use sunshine and moonlight for streaming my pc to various devices. Wayland forces me to use kms and I can't turn the monitors off while I'm doing it. Someone was working on a pipewire backend, so hopefully that goes somewhere.

GreenWithEnvy is also a nuisance on Wayland while Nvidia Settings Panel doesn't even work. I have a custom script just to control my fans on Wayland, but I'm eventually switching from Nvidia anyways, so it won't matter for much longer.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

iirc GWE is unmaintained atm

[-] D_Air1@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

GWE

The primary maintainer stepped down, but there has still been work done by other contributors. The primary problem is that the underlying library is reliant on x11. This is the same reason why nvidia-settings doesn't have all of its features on wayland. Basically if nvidia's on tool doesn't work then there is no way that green with envy can either. There is an open merge request attempting to switch to a different library that Nvidia says they plan to move to eventually, but it is slow going.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

do you use Xorg and if yes, what's keeping you from using Wayland?

currently sunshine doesnt support wayland. thats it.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 months ago

Chances are at some point it will be removed as it requires valuable man hours to maintain. At some point it will be a massive hindrance. I don't think it will be removed for a while but it probably will be forgotten about.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 29 points 6 months ago

I think X will still be around for a while but it makes no sense to use it with a full desktop like gnome. Gnome has its own stack so Wayland makes sense.

It will be cool to see desktops like Xfce4, Cinnamon and Mate get support.

[-] user134450@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

wouldnt Xfce have to rebrand though? lol

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago

Xfce4 is a name not a acronym. It used to be back in the day but it now uses GTK.

[-] user134450@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

yes, it is a name that is literally pronounced like "X face"

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 months ago

I pronounce it x f c e

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 16 points 6 months ago
[-] ElectroLisa 11 points 6 months ago

KWin is just a composer though. Plasma as a desktop environment still relies on XWayland

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 months ago
[-] Luna@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 months ago
[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 7 points 6 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Last week the GNOME 47 development code saw Wayland DRM lease protocol support for enhancing VR headset handling and separately was also accent color support for GNOME Shell.

Adding to the recent slew of changes landing for GNOME 47, the GNOME Shell and Mutter code can now be successfully compiled -- optionally -- without any X11 support or requiring any X11 build dependencies.

For those wanting to build a Wayland-only Linux desktop experience without carrying any aging X11 baggage, GNOME 47 will be able to optionally offer Wayland-only support without carrying X11/X.Org support.

That landed today along with this GNOME Shell merge request for being able to disable X11 support too.

In turn this closes a two year old issue tracker over making X11 dependencies optional on GNOME.

GNOME 47 is shaping up to be a very exciting desktop update due for release in September and will be found with the likes of Fedora 41 and Ubuntu 24.10.


The original article contains 172 words, the summary contains 158 words. Saved 8%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] stuckgum@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 months ago

Better to ship with X11 and make Crapland optional.

[-] 737 43 points 6 months ago
[-] Auzy@beehaw.org 11 points 6 months ago

I disagree.. The problem actually is that Wayland is optional, and still is.

So everyone was dragging their heels (and some still are). If all the major distro's set a cut off date, then things would speed up. The biggest reason for delay was Nvidia imho, so now that they're sorted, it seems things are falling into place faster.

X11 still hasn't solved any of their real issues, and its still a security nightmare (which can't be fixed). Furthermore, most of the developers have moved off it.

What exactly do you like about X11?

[-] pbjamm@beehaw.org 1 points 5 months ago

What exactly do you like about X11?

That it works just fine for my purposes. When it does not I will switch to Wayland but I have no reason to at the moment.

[-] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 3 points 6 months ago

That's the default everywhere else, yes

[-] Cwilliams@beehaw.org 2 points 5 months ago

Woohoo! One step closer to killing the tyranny of X11! He's almost dead already, just those pesky Nvidia users... (Or rather that pesky graphics card company)

[-] boringbisexual 3 points 5 months ago

The newest nvidia driver took care of the one issue I had with a specific game so I'm all Wayland now

[-] davemeech@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

If only I wasn't such a moron with trying to navigate around Nvidia drivers and Optimus, this sounds fantastic.

I have yet to figure all of this out and get to a smooth and stable state.

this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
227 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

48705 readers
884 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS