616
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/support@beehaw.org

hey folks, we'll be quick and to the point with this one:

we have made the decision to defederate from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works. we recognize this is hugely inconvenient for a wide variety of reasons, but we think this is a decision we need to take immediately. the remainder of the post details our thoughts and decision-making on why this is necessary.

we have been concerned with how sustainable the explosion of new users on Lemmy is--particularly with federation in mind--basically since it began. i have already related how difficult dealing with the explosion has been just constrained to this instance for us four Admins, and increasingly we're being confronted with external vectors we have to deal with that have further stressed our capabilities (elaborated on below).

an unfortunate reality we've also found is we just don't have the tools or the time here to parse out all the good from all the bad. all we have is a nuke and some pretty rudimentary mod powers that don't scale well. we have a list of improvements we'd like to see both on the moderation side of Lemmy and federation if at all possible--but we're unanimous in the belief that we can't wait on what we want to be developed here. separately, we want to do this now, while the band-aid can be ripped off with substantially less pain.

aside from/complementary to what's mentioned above, our reason for defederating, by and large, boils down to:

  • these two instances' open registration policy, which is extremely problematic for us given how federation works and how trivial it makes trolling, harassment, and other undesirable behavior;
  • the disproportionate number of moderator actions we take against users of these two instances, and the general amount of time we have to dedicate to bad actors on those two instances;
  • our need to preserve not only a moderated community but a vibe and general feeling this is actually a safe space for our users to participate in;
  • and the reality that fulfilling our ethos is simply not possible when we not only have to account for our own users but have to account for literally tens of thousands of new, completely unvetted users, some of whom explicitly see spaces like this as desirable to troll and disrupt and others of whom simply don't care about what our instance stands for

as Gaywallet puts it, in our discussion of whether to do this:

There's a lot of soft moderating that happens, where people step in to diffuse tense situations. But it's not just that, there's a vibe that comes along with it. Most people need a lot of trust and support to open up, and it's really hard to trust and support who's around you when there are bad actors. People shut themselves off in various ways when there's more hostility around them. They'll even shut themselves off when there's fake nice behavior around. There's a lot of nuance in modding a community like this and it's not just where we take moderator actions- sometimes people need to step in to diffuse, to negotiate, to help people grow. This only works when everyone is on the same page about our ethos and right now we can't even assess that for people who aren't from our instance, so we're walking a tightrope by trying to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. That isn't sustainable forever and especially not in the face of massive growth on such a short timeframe.

Explicitly safe spaces in real life typically aren't open to having strangers walk in off the street, even if they have a bouncer to throw problematic people out. A single negative interaction might require a lot of energy to undo.

and, to reiterate: we understand that a lot of people legitimately and fairly use these instances, and this is going to be painful while it's in effect. but we hope you can understand why we're doing this. our words, when we talk about building something better here, are not idle platitudes, and we are not out to build a space that grows at any cost. we want a better space, and we think this is necessary to do that right now. if you disagree we understand that, but we hope you can if nothing else come away with the understanding it was an informed decision.

this is also not a permanent judgement (or a moral one on the part of either community's owner, i should add--we just have differing interests here and that's fine). in the future as tools develop, cultures settle, attitudes and interest change, and the wave of newcomers settles down, we'll reassess whether we feel capable of refederating with these communities.

thanks for using our site folks.

(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Dee_Imaginarium@beehaw.org 10 points 2 years ago

Oh wow, totally get it though yeah it kinda sucks because there's some great communities there already. But, hopefully we can refederate in the future when the dust clears. REALLY glad I was able to get my Beehaw account set up just earlier today though lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] owl@beehaw.org 10 points 2 years ago

Thank you. I really appreciate what you're trying to build and the work you do. I'm impressed

[-] reric88@beehaw.org 10 points 2 years ago

I'm a new user so I my opinion shouldn't weigh as much as regulars, but here it is anyway.

I support this decision. Some people may jump to it being censorship which just is not the case. They have the freedom to go there if they want to. It's like keeping enablers out of alcoholics anonymous. The AA member can go get booze if they want to. But the enabler shouldn't be allowed inside. If they want in, they need to get in like the other members, not just waltz in through the door while on a kick.

I like this place. I currently feel like it's a great place, and the fact you guys make decisions like this reenforces that.

[-] millionsofplayers@beehaw.org 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Only read a section of the post but am i getting it correct that you’re basically defederating because of how many users are on the instances?

For now I disagree with this change because of world being the second biggest lemmy instance but I do understand the reasoning. Seeing how you also manage the third biggest instance this is probably gonna change lemmy as well

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Bluejay@beehaw.org 10 points 2 years ago

I really appreciate the commentary and transparency you guys have around your decisions - as someone that does not know nearly as much about federation I appreciate yall giving a framework for me to understand how to approach these topics. Really hope this takes some load off of your guys' backs.

[-] mtset@beehaw.org 10 points 2 years ago

Thank you for the transparency; I fully support this decision.

[-] toothbrush@beehaw.org 10 points 2 years ago

I personally think this is the wrong descision. The increased users are basically all coming because of the reddit protest and I think most malicious activity will cease when then the influx of reddit refugees dies down. I dont know about sh.itjust.works, but lemmy.world is well moderated, they are just as much struggling with new users as beehaw is, the only difference is that their moderation happens mostly at the community level. There are a lot of good communities on these servers that are worth keeping around. In my opinion we should be a little more patient with them and at least wait a bit until the reddit chaos dies down, because this situation is largely temporary, but our (temporary) defederation will have permanent chilling effects on all of lemmy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MJPsycs@beehaw.org 10 points 2 years ago

This was actually my fear when it came to a federated Reddit, I was wondering what was stopping admins from defederating with any instance for any reason, and what would happen when they did. It seemed like communities would become centralised on a few instances, which seemed against the point of a federated internet.

I've since started thinking of this site more as a forum, where you can also access other forums from. And suddenly it clicked as to why I would use this site. And I think Lemmy being hailed as a Reddit replacement has actually done a disservice to its potential.

I do think, however, that there needs to be discussions as a community about what we do and don't want here, and I think the most important one is about what communities we want and how we want to handle them. I don't believe that I was subscribed to any communities on these instances, but I'm sure that there probably would have been some that I would have enjoyed.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] wxboss@beehaw.org 10 points 2 years ago

I have to say that this decision is disappointing. I fully understand the reasons behind it, but part of my signing up with this instance was for access to Lemmy.world.

[-] Thorned_Rose@beehaw.org 10 points 2 years ago

Apologies, I'm still learning the ins and outs of the fediverse and I have Cognitive Impairment which makes learning harder - is this one or bi-directional? I have a Lemmy.world account as well so does that mean if I'm on lemmy.world, I won't be able to see Beehaw content? Or the other way around where I'm here and I won't be able to see lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works content? Or both?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SindriDeLaMancha@beehaw.org 10 points 2 years ago

"we have a list of improvements we’d like to see both on the moderation side of Lemmy and federation if at all possible" so out of curiosity whats on that list

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Halvdan@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 years ago

I completely understand and support the decision to cut the ties, even if it is unfortunate that it should be necessary. This is a nice instance and I hope it can stay that way, even for the mods. I have no idea how much work and perseverance it takes to run something like this but I know I couldn't do it. If the people running Beehaw say that it is too much to handle, then we should believe them. Without them, this would not be the nice place it is. I'm on Sopuli myself, but I like the vibe here and would hate to see it destroyed by trolls. Just my two cents. Cheers.

[-] reverendsteveii@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago

Love that this instance has decided to stick to its guns and take actions that support the mission as a first priority. The nature of the fediverse is such that anyone who wants the content can still go get it, it's as simple as another bookmark in your browser, and this space can remain bully-free. 100% support this decision, well done.

[-] Laconic@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago

I think the ideal way to interface with open registration communities would be to have a registration process where they can access beehaw from that server after they've filled out an application just as we did to be able to join here. I'm not a coder, but I think that wouldn't be too challenging a feature.

I'm not excited about losing access to a bunch of communities on the fediverse. I'm not excited about needing a 2nd account if I want to avoid this. I hope a resolution can be found to roll this back without causing the admins too much pain.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Vortex@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This kind of sucks. But until we get something equivalent to Mastodon's limited and better moderation tools, this'll have to do. I don't envy the mods workload.

Hopefully in the future we'll be able to "re-federate".

[-] MeowKittyWow@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago

Unfortunate, but I understand. I hope the moderation tools improve enough to refederate down the road.

[-] satouru@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago

Aww, that’s a bit sad, but it’s completely understandable and probably the right decision as things stand. :(

Admins, to clarify, which “federation logic/tools” would you need to re-federate with those public/general-purpose instances? Maybe something like:

  • Beehaw users may read and write content on restricted instances,
  • Users from restricted instances cannot read or write content on Beehaw,
  • Unless the user from another instance is manually verified on Beehaw… maybe? But that would be much more complex in terms of development.

Would that be an acceptable solution? If so, I can try to get a look at Lemmy’s code and see if I can implement something like that - although no promises, as I’m currently completely unfamiliar with what lies under the hood of both Lemmy and the Fediverse.

(Not sure who to ping… @alyaza, maybe?)

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
616 points (100.0% liked)

Beehaw Support

2867 readers
1 users here now

Support and meta community for Beehaw. Ask your questions about the community, technical issues, and other such things here.

A brief FAQ for lurkers and new users can be found here.

Our September 2024 financial update is here.

For a refresher on our philosophy, see also What is Beehaw?, The spirit of the rules, and Beehaw is a Community


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.


if you can see this, it's up  

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS