11
submitted 4 months ago by veer66@lemmy.one to c/devops@lemmy.ml
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] plasticbuddha@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

depends on actual requirements, but yes. Amazon's redundancy, segregation, and backup strategies are well thought out, and if you stick to a "well architected" design you can achieve very high levels of safety. AWS defines well architected in many tech docs and dashboards, and you can engage with their experts to achieve audit compliant redundancy and backup to suit almost any requirement.

[-] saint@group.lt 4 points 4 months ago
[-] stebator@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

When DB is RDS it is more convenient, why not? But, depending on needs, there could be databases not in RDS and you use traditional methods to backup them.

[-] veer66@lemmy.one 2 points 4 months ago

So, I imply that you mean it is normal.

this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
11 points (100.0% liked)

DevOps

830 readers
1 users here now

Development & operations

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS