77
submitted 2 months ago by ByroTriz@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

If I decide to self-publish a book what happens to the copyright? Is there a way to prevent others from claiming copyrights for a book published autonomously? Are there OS licenses specifically tuned for books?

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] taanegl@beehaw.org 55 points 2 months ago

When it comes to creative work, Creative Commons is the way to go. I know a guy who exclusively releases music under the Creative Commons license.

Here's a "Chooser" wizard, that asks you some questions and then suggests a suitable CC license for you.

[-] Shimon@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 months ago

Fun fact KGWZ released one of their albums completly free (i guess public domain) and encourage you to play with it as much as you want :)

https://kinggizzardandthelizardwizard.com/polygondwanaland

[-] taanegl@beehaw.org 7 points 2 months ago

Here's a careful reminder that "public domain" is not a worldwide thing ^^; in fact, very few countries have a public domain.

In some cases, if you try to publish something as "public domain" from a certain country, it is invalid - because their judiciary does not define public domain as anything.

It maybe considered public domain, until you die and someone wants that copyright, in which case the family takes precedent over the estate - full stop.

There's a difference between countries that have common law (US and UK) and those that have civil law (the Nordics), so yeah.

But CC is valid license pretty much everywhere, with a few exceptions.

[-] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 29 points 2 months ago

https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/cclicenses/

You probably want the SA (share-alike) or NC-SA (non-commercial share-alike) but take a look and decide what suits you best.

From https://creativecommons.org/faq/#do-i-have-to-provide-my-name-can-i-ask-that-my-name-be-removed :

Do I have to provide my name? Can I ask that my name be removed?

As a licensor, you may choose to receive under any name that you wish, such as a pseudonym or pen name, or you may choose not to be credited by name at all, and to publish anonymously. You do not have to be credited under your legal name. Most jurisdictions permit this, but you should check to be sure this is valid in your jurisdiction.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 3 points 2 months ago

Don't go NC. Authors should be able to sell their work (and derivates too)

[-] lud@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago

The original author could sell their work anyway.

[-] billgamesh@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago

It's useful as it makes it harder for AI to use it. Derivates can still reach out to ask to be allowed to sell it

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 3 points 2 months ago

We shouldn't throw humans under the bus just to thwart AI. This is not the way.

[-] billgamesh@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago

I'm fine with making people email me if they want to sell derivatives of a creative work tho

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 3 points 2 months ago

And if you're dead or incarcerated or otherwise uncontactable?

[-] billgamesh@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

Then I won't be suing for copyright infringement

[-] vox@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

copyright will eventually expire after your death

and cc nc does not prevent derivatives, just profiting off of them without explicit permission, which is not that big of a deal

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 3 points 2 months ago

It is a big deal! Its the difference between starving and not

[-] vox@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

the author can still sell the work, the NC prevents other people from profiting off of it without explicit permission (this does not prevent exemptions, work can still be sold under cc-by-sa as an exemption)

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 14 points 2 months ago
[-] vox@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

or CC BY-NC-SA (the non-commercial-use-only one)

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 2 months ago

No, not NC. People should be able to feed themselves for their work

[-] mholiv@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

With a NC license, the author still can sell the work and make money. It’s just that other people can’t.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 2 months ago

Yes. And other people should be able to use other people's work to make derivative works to feed themselves

[-] mholiv@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I think that’s best left up to the author. Sometimes someone might prefer that their art stay independent of capitalism. I think that is a respectable position.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 2 months ago

You're not a capitalist because you need to buy food

[-] mholiv@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

But selling other peoples’ labor would introduce it to the capitalist system. Not saying that makes you a capitalist. Just saying some people might want to keep their art out of that system.

[-] ResoluteCatnap@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

That is entirely up to the author who is creating the original work. They set the license and people can choose whether or not they want to work with the license. If i wanted to use someone else's work for commercial purposes then i would just ignore any works released under a NC license. I'm not entitled to someone else's work just because i need to eat

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 2 months ago

Assholes choose not to copyleft. Assholes choose NC licensees too

[-] s12@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 months ago

RMS’s biography “Free as in Freedom” seems to be under the GNU Free Documentation License, incase that’s anything to go by.

[-] 10_0@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago

Personally I would keep it proprietary unit I've made all the money I can they change it to an open license like Creative Commons Share-A-like

[-] Linus_Torvalds@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I hope that you will never publish a book.

[-] 10_0@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago
this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
77 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

30263 readers
26 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS