201
submitted 2 years ago by jordanlund@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/16783334

8-1 with Thomas the dissent.

“The court and government do not point to a single historical law revoking a citizen’s Second Amendment right based on possible interpersonal violence,” Thomas wrote. “Yet, in the interest of ensuring the Government can regulate one subset of society, today’s decision puts at risk the Second Amendment rights of many more.”

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Coffee_Addict@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago

Lol of course Thomas would be the only one to dissent. Though, I am surprised that Alito didn’t also.

To be honest, I am kinda surprised this was upheld at all, given how conservative the supreme court is.

Not that I’m complaining; at the very least it’s a step in the direction for gun control.

[-] tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 years ago

That 40% of cops will be able to keep theirs since they claim the time they spend beating their spouses as "overtime".

[-] 555_1@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Their spouses must have been holding a cell phone that looked like a gun.

Not having legal precedence is hardly a reason to dissent, Thomas.

I'm pretty sure the 13th amendment had about the same level of legal precedence too.

[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Not having legal precedence is hardly a reason to dissent...

Under the Bruen test it is. Even the majority would agree with that. Thomas differed from them by stating that the laws proposed in the main opinion were not relevantly similar enough to the one before the correct.

The test wouldn't apply to the 13th amendment because that's a constitutional amendment, and not a law allegedly impacting a right.

[-] Pavidus@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

I'm curious to see how this works with law enforcement.

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 12 points 2 years ago

Law enforcement officials immune to domestic violence accusations

[-] Drusas@kbin.run 6 points 2 years ago

Good luck getting a restraining order against your abusive partner when he's a cop.

[-] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.autism.place 2 points 2 years ago

I had a girlfriend that was a sheriff deputy. those people seriously have each other's backs with things. it's definitely a government-sanctioned gang.

[-] BassaForte@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

That's how it's been IIRC. This is just the SC saying it's going to stay that way.

[-] EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago

Sweet!

Cops without guns is a giant leap forward for America!

this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
201 points (100.0% liked)

News

38021 readers
1556 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS