3
submitted 1 year ago by Gloccu@lemmy.one to c/electriccars@lemmy.ca

How do you feel about GM and Ford moving the NACS charging standard, is it going to have a ripple effect?

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

As the owner of a CCS-ported car, I'm ok with this.

One standard, down from three options, seems right. Imagine having to worry about which shape of the filler nozzle at a gas station...

It will be nice to be able to use the rows and rows of vacant superchargers here in Atlantic Canada. The CCS chargers are too-often a gamble (or non-existent).

[-] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Isn't the Tesla version missing key features that other port styles have?

[-] theluketaylor@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Nothing too critical to North America. NACS doesn’t support 3 phase (but neither does J-1772).

Tesla superchargers are currently limited to 400V, but that isn’t a limit of NACS or the handles themselves, more a reflection of Tesla not needing more than 400V so far. V4 superchargers are supposed to be able to do 1000V and the NACS spec is for 500 or 1000V.

[-] LJay71@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

With GM now on board I'm pretty sure this will cause a ripple effect and more automakers will join. Some sooner than others. The supercharger network has proven to be reliable for Teslas. I think it's a good thing all around. However, we won't truly know how well Ford and GM vehicles will integrate with superchargers until owners pull up and plug in. I have my fingers crossed that Volvo/Polestar is next!

this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

Electric Cars

652 readers
1 users here now

Discussion of EVs and the technology around them

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS