342
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 249 points 1 year ago

Automatic draft, but notvoter registration...

[-] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago

Just because the politicians want to grab you out of your life and use you as cannon fodder doesn't mean they want to actually be as accountable to you as they're supposed to.

[-] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 year ago

Politicians voting for mandatory draft should be on the frontline. Pieces of shit.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

Automatic registration for Selective Services, not automatic draft. That’s very different. This is actually helpful in keeping people out of prison or getting fined for not registering.

But yes, this absolutely proves that they could automatically register people to vote with no designated party affiliation.

[-] ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world 143 points 1 year ago

I might catch hate for this but I never understood why it wasn't automatic the entire time since it's illegal to not register.

[-] blackluster117@possumpat.io 47 points 1 year ago

Easy way to funnel the lazy into prison labor?

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Not any more at least. Prior to this bill, failing to register for Selective Services was a felony punishable by imprisonment for up to five years and/or a fine of not more than $250,000.

Now you’re automatically enrolled. I think it’s actually better this way.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] homura1650@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago

Because there has not been a draft since the 70s, where automatic registration was not feasible.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Yes, but failure to register was a felony.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Yeah — seems like they just want to test people

[-] TAG@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

It was not automatic so rich people can avoid it. I have never heard of someone facing criminal charges for failing to register. I have heard that failing to register can impact eligibility for college financial aid and scholarships.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 104 points 1 year ago

You're already legally required to manually register with the selective service if you are male and you turn 18.

Why not just introduce legislation to end that requirement altogether.

[-] TaeKwonDoh@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Don't give them ideas.

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

As an aside, my parents kept me out of the "the system" for most of my youth so I missed my deadline, I never knew it existed.

This made me ineligible for some benefits like federal loans and other programs. I wrote to Selective Service with a notarized letter that my failure to register was truly an oversight and they sent me a waiver and cleared my status.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago

This will definitely get the kids voting Republican.

GOP 2024: We want you to die.

[-] Jubei_K_08@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago

Remember kids, you can be a draft dodger and be president 😎👉👉

[-] snow_bunny@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Which would be fine if said draft dodger wasn't a chickenhawk.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] iopq@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago

Disagree, just make the draft also affect women so it's not sexist

[-] DadVolante@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

Good news for you, I guess.... this includes making women sign up.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago

So people can be automatically registered for the draft, but not automatically registered to vote? Seems like bullshit.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago

For one, I think this was already required. I remember having to enroll in selective service.

For two though, whoever calls another draft is dead in the water. It's commonly accepted that starting an actual draft is political suicide.

That said, it would be nice if we could codify that and ban the draft.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

You are required to sign up but they usually only can enforce it in ways such as applying for a driver's license or voter registration. Maybe more kids aren't applying for drivers licenses and therefore aren't signing up.

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wouldn't put it past the Republican party to bring conscription to the table. Probably with all kinds of exceptions and loopholes to either keep their own kids out of it entirely or guarantee cush domestic desk jobs to show how patriotic they are. Everybody else gets to line up with a rifle.

Edit: Well, while I was baselessly speculating, this happened to come up on Lemmy: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2024/06/trump-world-mandatory-military-service-washington-post/

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago

Fully automated luxury war slavery

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

Fuck the draft. Dodge the draft.

[-] hardaysknight@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

If you can dodge a draft, you can dodge a ball

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Some folks inherit star-spangled eyes

Ooh, they send you down to war, Lord

And when you ask 'em, "How much should we give?"

Ooh, they only answer, "More! More! More!" Yo

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

Seems like a pretty good Common Sense legislation really. You already have to register by law so making it automatic would be easier for all of us and avoid anyone getting in trouble for something stupid. I don't see a downside to this. I would like to see it apply to voting registration too however.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Copernican@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

I'm for this. Don't vote for war mongers when you or your kids or grandkids could be drafted for war.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 25 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately there are no non-warmonger candidates in r or d and voting third party is a vote for trump so I guess we're all fucked amiright

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] uis@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago
[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Something tells me fragging (the original kind) might have a chance of becoming de rigueur again.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2024
342 points (100.0% liked)

News

31456 readers
3045 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS