183
Homeowners Block My Local Passenger Rail (infosec.pub)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by henfredemars@infosec.pub to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml
27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I’m not sure if an opinion piece is appropriate here, so please let me know if this doesn’t fit the theme of the community, and I’ll avoid sharing such thoughts in the future.

I’m extremely frustrated with the car centric culture in my area. I live about 25 miles west of a quarry. Every day I watch trains go up and down the railroad mostly carrying gravel. This railroad stretches for several hours by car in each direction, connecting several large cities and even passing a few tourist attractions, and despite our traffic congestion problems there is little interest in trying to use this rail for actual people.

One company moved in and started running a new passenger rail service. Within a few weeks, we had protesters at the railroads complaining that drivers don’t understand railroad crossings. I saw posters about how trains were killing residents when drivers park on the tracks and get hit. I don’t understand! Where do you think the train is going to go? They don’t exactly come out of nowhere. They follow the tracks! And we’ve always had trains passing through our town before. At a later local election a candidate ran on the premise that they’re going to protect home values and our children by reducing or eliminating the number of trains passing through our town. This candidate did win our local election and sadly they succeeded in cutting down on rail investment.

Fast-forward a couple years later. Passenger rail stations were built at the endpoints of this rail to ferry tourists. I drive parallel to this rail on the way to work several times per week for almost 45 minutes each way, 20 minutes of which is heavy traffic. I get to enjoy watching people ride the train while there’s no stop anywhere near my house because our local government has sided with homeowners that a passenger rail station is “simply too dangerous.” I would have to drive over an hour to the nearest passenger rail station to ride the train, and I can literally see the tracks from my apartment.

Every time I see that train I feel bitter. I could save so much money if these boneheads would have let them build a train station in our town. Absolutely ridiculous! The train is there. The rail is there. I don’t understand why a train is such a personal, existential threat to your way of life.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 54 points 5 months ago

Frankly if you don’t get that a train is going to come down the rails and hit you if you park there then you deserve to get eliminated from the gene pool.

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 26 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

100%! The arguments I heard against building the station were asinine. The logic just doesn’t follow. For example, the train is dangerous to children? Well how about the actual highway that runs next to the track? Clearly that’s not a threat or dangerous to residents in any way. As we all know, cars are perfectly safe. One little girl gets hit by the train and we ignore all the deaths of the children from auto accidents. The rail is overwhelmingly safer.

I’ve lived in this town for quite a long time and it’s a common occurrence to see cars stopped on the train tracks. While we have plenty of idiots, I can hardly blame the train if a car gets hit. It should always be the fault of the vehicle.

[-] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago

It infuriates me to my bones how Americans specifically think about driving vs. other modes of transportation.

$34B to repair a quarter-mile long stretch of highway? What the hey, it's not our money (Narrator: it was, at least partially).
$10M to add bike lanes to a busy road with one of the highest crash fatality statistics in my city that's basically a highway? REEEE NOT IN MY BACKYARD!

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 22 points 5 months ago

My stupid town hasn’t even succeeded in preventing the train from passing through. They just don’t want a station here so no one can benefit from the train. What a stupid stupid policy.

[-] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If people could take it, they might realize that cars are actually one of the worst modes of transportation ever invented by humanity. That would be unacceptable to the auto industry.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

NIMBYs are, by and large, very stupid.

[-] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Worse. They're afraid. Of what, you say? Couldn't tell you, and they can't either.

[-] Facebones@reddthat.com 11 points 5 months ago

My city had Amtrak back in the 70s or something and it came back a few years ago. The common thread I see around here is "I caught an hour delay one time so never again!"

Never mind that they get held up for hours every other time they travel on the highway, that's just part of it, I guess? Enjoy sitting there burning gas I'll just take a nap 🤷

[-] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Even worse, those same people come home from their commute and immediately pour themselves a drink or kvetch to their partners about how bad the commute was. I mean... you cannot convince me that ANYONE likes sitting in traffic, it's just anathema to the human mind.

[-] pingveno@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

Unfortunately the trains are like that, especially under a few circumstances:

  • Long distance
  • Single track
  • Rail congestion
  • Shared with freight
  • Long freight trains that are harder to pass
[-] Facebones@reddthat.com 2 points 5 months ago

Sure, and all of that should be tended to, but it doesn't make massive delays an absolute or change that driving can be just as unreliable but gets this mental loophole even though people bitch about it constantly.

[-] pingveno@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

Absolutely. I was hearing that Switzerland has excellent on time performance, to the point where 5 minutes is considered late (and that happens infrequently). For comparison, Amtrak uses a 15 minute threshold for lateness. This accuracy, the "integrated timetable" strategy that syncs trains with other trains and transportation modes, and frequent service allow for tight transfer times.

[-] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Also the fact that the vast majority of our remaining rails are owned by private freight companies that get to make up silly rules like passenger trains having to pull over for ridiculously long and slow freight trains to pass them.

[-] pingveno@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

Yeah, passenger trains pretty much have no choice if there is a 2 mile freight train, a single track, and a short siding. The passenger train has to pull off and wait. There really need to be something like financial penalties for the rail carrier every time that happens. Something to make extremely long trains uneconomical.

One thing they've been working on in my neck of the woods on the Amtrak Cascades line is passenger train only track that runs in the same right-of-way. I'm not sure exactly how it works, but I assume that passenger trains run on it by default and switch to the freight rail or sidings when there is a passenger train going the other way. The Seattle-Portland leg is already congested between freight and passenger traffic. Additional track should aid on time performance for the eventual target of 13 round trips per day. They also got the line rerouted off a single track route that was a serious bottleneck.

[-] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Because those aren’t the actual arguments they respond to, just the face of the arguments. The real argument is that the car is an extension of the self. They should be able to drive anywhere, park anywhere, drive anything, without fear (Traffic deaths are unavoidable and unremarkable), judgment (I drive a Tesla, I’m saving the earth!), or undue cost (gas and maintenance. Sometimes tolls.) except for that which they’ve already internalized.

Public transport is by definition collective. The train is not an extension of you. It is a thing we all collectively benefit from. It isn’t tailored to your specific tastes. It doesn’t go 0-60 faster than Joe Nextdoor’s train. Everyone pays the same, you can’t show off how fancy your ticket is.

Some kid killed on the tracks is the fault of the train, because the driver could have been any of us. We are relatable people. The train is an unrelatable, unaccountable “us” that Americans will never, ever choose over their ideal “me.”

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 6 points 5 months ago

I appreciate the thoughtful response. I think I understand that the vehicle is connected deeply with identity, but no one’s threatening to take away their vehicles. I’m surprised that public transportation is taken so personally.

If you don’t like the train, you don’t have to take the train. But, that’s not enough. They don’t want the train to be available to me either. It’s weird. It’s taken one step further into a fuck you I’ve got mine attitude.

[-] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

In places with good transit, you actually can show off a fancy ticket. Some rail offers first class flight type of accommodations which can include more leg/seat room, comfier seating, a meal, and other amenities.

[-] Icalasari@fedia.io 8 points 5 months ago

My brother at 13 was killed by a train

What my mother did was start a campaign to get people to practice common sense and safety around trains. Our family doesn't blame the train at all - We instead got better crossing safety put in place and helped get more awareness that train tracks are stabilized in cities to minimize noise and that horns are directed outwards, so a train is quieter head on than you think, ie look both ways before you cross

Like, if my own family can get that, then why can't these anti train fucks?

[-] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

It isn't about logic, it is about preventing the station which prevents the denser developments that come with it and prevents people from living in those developments. These protesters mostly want to preserve (read increase) their property values while preserving the "character of the neighbourhood" (read if you don't already live here, you don't belong).

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 3 points 5 months ago

We need those denser deployments: we have a growing population, a homeless problem, and a lack of affordable housing. This is even ignoring the traffic issues on the nearby highways. It's bad, but the message to me is clearly that we don't want to solve any of these problems.

[-] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I agree, we definitely need density and transit. It would help the climate and housing situations.

[-] redditron_2000_4@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago

Does the mayor own a car dealership? For us, it is the county judge and so we have no public transit. Why would people buy from his Lexus dealership if the bus could get them where they needed to go? It’s insanity.

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

A quick search says while the mayor is wealthy, I couldn’t find any information on business assets. I think this comes more from a culture clash or crisis of identity that makes the train look dangerous.

[-] ch00f@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago

I don’t understand! Where do you think the train is going to go? They don’t exactly come out of nowhere.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 5 months ago

A car brain is a very small brain. It makes lots of noise vrooom vrroooom vroooom but it doesn't go anywhere.

[-] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Are they also protesting the frieght trains that are often heavier and noisier? Or just the trains that let "poor people" get around?

Every rail in an urban area near me has signs saying not to block the track. Every crossing on a busy road has lights and crossing bars. Every low traffic crossing has warning signs and a STOP before crossing.

These signs are for drivers, drivers are trained to recognize them and they resemble all the other road signs drivers are expected to follow.

If your area is using similar signage then this is 100% on negligent drivers. If they replace that rail with a road are drivers just going to run the red or gridlock the intersection like they currently treat the rail crossing?

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 3 points 5 months ago

I wasn't aware of any complaints about the trains for years prior to the passenger rail company joining in; it was only when trains carrying people entered the picture that the protesting began claiming that these trains are unsafe and unwanted, but the arguments I've seen on signs etc. aren't related to passenger rail specifically. Perhaps the passenger rail stoked fears that the rail traffic would expand further.

Every railroad crossing is clearly marked, with multiple redundant flashing signals and moving barriers that get directly in the driver LOS. I've seen drivers push through the barriers to squeeze just ahead of or behind a moving train a handful of times in the past five years, but that's about the same number of blatant red light runners I've seen in the same.

this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
183 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9805 readers
64 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
uthredii@lemmy.ml
uthredii@beehaw.org