63
submitted 6 months ago by DolphinMath@slrpnk.net to c/world@lemmy.world

Qatari news network Al Jazeera is stridently denying any link to Gaza-based journalist Abdallah Aljamal, amid unverified rumors that hostage Noa Argamani had been held at his home in central Gaza’s Nuseirat.

According to various rumors, some of which have been picked up by Hebrew-language media with varying levels of credulity, Argamani was held at the home of Dr. Ahmed Aljamal and his son Abdallah. They also claim that Abdallah is an employee of Al-Jazeera.

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago

Please stop flagging this thread as misinformation. Whether or not you believe that the Al Jazeera journalist had any responsibility here, the article is about them denying it.

That is not misinformation. They do deny it.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 6 months ago

This is the articles source

According to various rumors, some of which have been picked up by Hebrew-language media with varying levels of credulity,

How is it not?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

Because Al Jazeera denies it. That is a fact. If you're saying that the Times is claiming Al Jazeera denies a rumor the Times started themselves, it does not make it any less factual that Al Jazeera denies it. And the article is about Al Jazeera denying it.

[-] mindlight@lemm.ee 12 points 6 months ago

It's impossible! Because that would mean that Hamas is hiding among civilians, effectively using them civilians as shields...

[-] floridaman 30 points 6 months ago

Nobody is saying Hamas isn't using civilians as human shields, they're just saying that it doesn't justify bombing civilians...

فلسطين حرة 🇵🇸 Слава Україні 🇺🇦

[-] bamboo@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago

Hamas isn’t using civilians as human shields. At least, not at scale. Israel and its western co-conspirators manufacture evidence to use to justify the genocide, but none of that evidence is concrete. It’s just intelligence people making baseless claims.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago

Unless you define "human shields" as "another person within a quarter mile".

[-] DolphinMath@slrpnk.net 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Times of Israel – Bias and Credibility

Bias Rating: Left-Center


Factual Reporting: High


Country: Israel


MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: Moderate


Media Type: Website


Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic


MBFC Credibility Rating: High Credibility

MediaBiasFactCheck.com: About + Methodology

Ad Fontes Media Rating: N/A

By: Gianluca Pacchiani

Archive: 9 Jun 2024 19:06:44 UTC

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Perfect example of how suspect MBFC is.

Times of Israel has such immense bias in favor of the IDF and the fascist apartheid regime, and such lax fact checking on the one subject people outside Israel read it for that it's not AT ALL credible and MBFC, being basically the hobby of a conservative Zionist, rates it left of center and highly factual 🤦

Eta examples from the "detailed report":

minimally loaded language such as this: US envoy suggests world should rethink PA aid after Israeli teen killed by bomb.

Failed Fact Checks

None in the Last 5 years

Both examples of absolutely atrocious levels of bias on the part of MBFC.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 6 months ago
[-] DolphinMath@slrpnk.net 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Fox News has a mixed score for factual reporting…

But a “Low Credibility Rating

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 6 months ago

Low Credibility Rating

For the made up rating mbfc makes then puts no reasoning in their actual post.

MBFC tries to make itself credible then does shit like that where makes it fit what they want. like ranking higher pro Zionist publications

[-] DolphinMath@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Want to see a headline from an Israeli source with a stronger bias?

Arutz Sheva: IDF confirms: Al Jazeera journalist was terrorist who held hostages

Their ratings from MBFC:

Arutz Sheva (Israel National News) – Bias and Credibility

Bias Rating: Right-Center

Factual Reporting: Mixed

Country: Israel

MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: Moderate

Media Type: TV Station

Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: Medium Credibility

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

The bias is strong in the case of TOI. This is extreme bordering on !nottheonion@lemmy.world territory.

And still MBFC rates them center right rather than far right and the factuality "mixed" rather than "low" or "very low".

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 6 months ago

Al Jazeera journalist was terrorist who held hostages

My favorite is the only source listed in every article is just IDF, totally credible

[-] DolphinMath@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It’s all relative. Want to see something from a further right Israeli source?

Israel Hayom:

Report: Former hostage Noa Argamani held captive in Al-Jazeera cameraman's house

Their ratings from MBFC:

Israel Hayom – Bias and Credibility

Bias Rating: Right

Factual Reporting: Mixed

Country: Israel

MBFC’s Country Freedom Rating: Moderate

Media Type: Newspaper

Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: Medium Credibility

[-] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

And they are subject to military censorship!

this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
63 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39371 readers
2040 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS