68
submitted 5 months ago by capt_kafei@lemmy.ca to c/environment@beehaw.org
all 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlashMobOfOne@beehaw.org 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Now THAT is what I'm talking about.

It should be commonplace, not rare, to see government function in a way other than rewarding the rich and handing out war money

[-] ninjaphysics@beehaw.org 2 points 5 months ago

100% agree. I'm cautiously optimistic about other states following suit. My guess is Massachusetts next, then we hopefully see a cascade effect.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 5 months ago

🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

Click here to see the summaryVermont has become the first state to enact a law holding oil firms financially responsible for climate damages, after the Republican governor, Phil Scott, allowed it to pass without his signature late on Thursday.

Under the legislation, Vermont officials will have until January 2026 to assess the total costs to the state from greenhouse gases emitted between 1995 and 2024, including the impacts on public health, biodiversity and economic development.

“It’s not every day you get to be part of something that’s both historic and potentially game-changing for all the citizens of your state,” Ben Edgerly Walsh, an advocate at the Vermont Public Interest Research Group, said.

Supporters hope the bill can serve as a model for the rest of the country as Maryland, Massachusetts and New York are considering similar measures, and as federal lawmakers weigh proposals submitted by Senators Bernie Sanders and Chris Van Hollen.

Edgerly Walsh, however, said the legislature took steps to accommodate those concerns, including by adding funding for state agencies to manage implementation.

The American Petroleum Institute, the largest oil and gas lobby group in the US, sent a letter in March to Vermont lawmakers opposing the bill, claiming it “retroactively imposes costs and liability on prior activities that were legal” and “violates equal protection and due process rights by holding companies responsible for the actions of society at large”.


Saved 60% of original text.

this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2024
68 points (100.0% liked)

Environment

3919 readers
54 users here now

Environmental and ecological discussion, particularly of things like weather and other natural phenomena (especially if they're not breaking news).

See also our Nature and Gardening community for discussion centered around things like hiking, animals in their natural habitat, and gardening (urban or rural).


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS