527
submitted 1 year ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 74 points 1 year ago

It's been 20 years since broadband became fairly ubiquitous, there is 0 excuse for telcos to milk us like this, bandwidth gets so much cheaper for them every year.

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The 25/3 bar was specifically lowered to that so that 4G LTE would meet this bar and they could claim that 99% of Americans now have access to high-speed Internet for political points.

Realistically, if it were up to me, I'd say anything 25/3 and lower is "low-speed", between 25/3 and 100/10 is "standard speed", and set the bar for "high-speed" to mean 100/10 or better. Companies should not be allowed to advertise "blazing-fast high-speed Internet" and then it turns out to be 30/3 ADSL for $50 a month

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Foggyfroggy@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago

They’ve been stealing taxpayer dollars for 30 years, constantly stalling and delaying and then saying the plans are now outdated and we need more money for the new plans. Repeat every decade. Everyone knows it’s a monopoly with speed/price fixing yet somehow it never improves.

[-] Aimhere@mastodon.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago

@Foggyfroggy @BrikoX I really wish someone in the FCC /FTC/Federal government in general would put their foot down and say to the industry, "You WILL build broadband everywhere, you WILL make it 100 Mbps at minimum, and you WILL pay for it out of your own pocket." Nothing less is acceptable.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Can't speak to Comcast's evils, but I call my ISP once a year to ask about my speeds and bill. Just got bumped from 200/20 to 1000/?, with a $10 discount. I'm on the edge of town, not technically rural, but close enough.

Not sure the answer to the monopoly thing, but I used to be an internet cable guy, so I can speak to the complexity of having 2 providers where there was only one. The costs are staggering.

[-] baronvonj@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Not sure the answer to the monopoly thing,

  • make it a publicly owned and operated municipal utility
  • make the "last mile" publicly owned infrastructure and private service providers can connect to the data center that connects the last mile
  • require that the company who owns and maintains the last mile can not also be a service provider over that last mile infrastructure

The last one is how Texas handles the power grid, so it would need a real regulatory body making sure the private last mile infrastructure is actually maintained, unlike the Texas power grid.

[-] Mdotaut801@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Currently in Utah with a city that offers municipal fiber. 1gb up, 1gb down for $60 per month. Luckily my city does that and many things right, I wish others would follow. My buddy who lives 10 min away in another city has comcast and whatever century link calls themselves these days.

[-] baronvonj@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Looks like over a dozen states ban municipal ISP in some form or another.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 0x01@lemmy.ml 54 points 1 year ago

After how ajit pai shilled the fuck out of the chair position I don't know if I can ever take it seriously again.

Fuck ajit pai, of course.

[-] Bender_Rodriguez@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Data caps are just as fucking evil. Pure greed.

[-] EternalWarBear@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Yeah we would've had it already too if the government didn't get fleeced. It was about 2010 when the "National Broadband Plan" was unveiled. Part of its goal was 100Mbs to 100M people by 2020.

[-] McNasty@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Comcast is finally doing their part in WV.

There's an absolutely massive fiber install happening statewide.

[-] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

Tell that to Spectrum. ‘Up-to 300mbps’ my ass.

[-] BitingChaos@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Their shit 10 Mbps upload speed is the worst part.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Countmacula@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Fuck spectrum

[-] Einstein@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I get like 330-340 from spectrum 🤷🏼‍♂️

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Xylight@lemmy.xylight.dev 18 points 1 year ago

...that's the standard? wtf? 100mbps is a bit slow but would make sense, but 25???

[-] EatMyDick@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I love even crazy tech nerds say this shit. 100mbps is more than enough for the vast majority of families. Unless you constantly have 5 or 6 streams running concurrently you'll never use more than that outside of the occasional video game download.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It’s not though. You’re taking marketing claims at face value, assuming the customer consistently sees that bandwidth with few to no glitches and low latency. You’re assuming bandwidth isn’t sucked down by ads and trackers. Doing the math in ideal numbers makes it look sufficient, but actually using it highlights that it’s not

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] matthewc@lemmy.self-host.site 3 points 1 year ago

Raising the standard enables new uses of technology.

[-] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Shit, we can't have that!
~telecoms

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

I think this is the "up to speed of __" nonsense. I have 30 and we can stream multiple devices.

[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

We don't really think the FCC chair is going to do anything, do we?

[-] omega_x3@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

There are 4 people in the FCC that get to vote on policy, 2 democrats and 2 republican. The republican ones are just Comcast and att lobbyist. The democrats don't suck but can't do anything without a third vote. The president gets to appointment someone to be a tie breaker, but Biden didn't do it until after midterm so they no longer had the votes to get her approved, and by the time the current one gets through the next election will be happening so nothing will get done. If Biden wins another FCC voter will have to step down and wait for Biden to pick a replacement and Congress gets to approve or Biden losses and the republican appoints another lobbyist.

So no nothing will be done.

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't call this speed okay even in 2012

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Throw more free money at the major telco firms. I’m sure that’ll fix it. Not like we haven’t tried that before. Repeatedly.

[-] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Yes that's shit.

But also on top of that 25 really means maybe 15, because they also don't require them to provide the bandwidth they advertise to you.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Zana@startrek.website 6 points 1 year ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] GustavoM@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Feel free to throw rocks at me and put me on a cross, but 25Mbps is still good enough as is...

...if all you are doing w/ it is to let a live stream of a beach playing 24/7 on a small display or something like that. :^)

t. I'm doing that right now -- on a rpi 4 that is on my left. It's breddy gucci.

[-] Jdog09@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I’m just waiting on anyone to kick my 15/3 AT&T out of our subdivision.

[-] SpeedLimit55@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Thats good, 25/3 speed is fine for one person, not so much for a household.

[-] Kerrigor@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

Absolutely not. It depends more on what you're doing, rather than number of people, anyways. One person uploading a video is going to use 99% of the available upload bandwidth.

[-] zikk_transport2@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

One person uploading a video is going to use 99% of the available upload bandwidth.

CAKE and QoS: Bonjor

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

We have 30 down, can stream multiple devices. I think it's the "up to" nonsense, actual 30 (not sure I even get that) seems ok.

[-] vividspecter@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

It's the upload that's the problem. 30mbps down is passable; 3mbps up is absurdly slow.

[-] acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Not only that, but since it’s synchronous, if you’re uploading at nearly 3 Mbps, your download rate absolutely tanks.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SpeedLimit55@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah 30 down (or 25) can stream multiple HD feeds but only a single 4K feed.

[-] mojo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Lol I like how this post somehow has negative one downvote

[-] Kinglink@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Great, now what are we going to do about it?

Hell just outlaw datacaps and I'd say that's a good step.

That being said I doubt almost anyone on here probably has more than those speeds, Cox (the worst cable company, trust me) gives me 10x those numbers, but the real problem is they'll continue to raise the rates on us, and worse, there's no competition. Verizon 5g came by and it's not really a viable alternative, because Cox just out paces them enough, but ultimately, you're going to spend at least 100 dollars a month on Cable, but still there's no choices available.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
527 points (100.0% liked)

News

23190 readers
2610 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS