696
Total Recall (lemmy.world)
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 176 points 10 months ago

Of cause they will have permission. It's in the TOS and EULA if you don't want to have them doing it you will have to use something else.

This is 100% a core feature and will break windows if you disable it. You know, until Europe says we have to let people disable it then we will only allow European versions disable it.

Unless you are an enterprise than you can flip these 2 registry keys and that group policy to disable it, but we will revert that setting every time we update the software, which will be about every month.

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 54 points 10 months ago

Hey, nobody is stopping your country from enforcing things like the EU.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 65 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Gerrymandered Congress, no campaign finance laws, bought and paid for judiciary - Allow us to introduce ourselves

[-] trolololol@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago
[-] then_three_more@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

Cries in Tory Brexit.

[-] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 11 points 10 months ago

Yes, but only if you don't count the billionaires: Elon Musk VS Brazilian Judge

[-] elvith@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 10 months ago

enforcing things like the EU

You mean like "client side scanning of all media you send via any (chat) app before encryption and sending all media that might trigger $algorithm to the police"? Yes, it happens only if you consented to it, but good luck using those apps without giving consent...

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 10 months ago

Our dear leaders are okay with it as long as it's a USA company doing it

[-] Ptsf@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Why do we live in this hell? Fuckin end users man, let me roll Arch.

[-] stanleytweedle@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yay another feature I have to figure out how to disable.

[-] businessfish 34 points 10 months ago

i wouldn't trust a company who would enable this by default to allow users to TRULY completely disable it. much like how you can only opt out of the telemetry options they allow you to.

[-] HumanPerson@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago

I'm not a windows user, but I've heard windows enterprise has a lot of the annoyances enabled. Also linux, but I'm guessing there's a reason you don't use that already.

[-] stanleytweedle@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I use linux at home but manage windows and linux at work so I'm pretty much stuck with having to deal with MS bullshit for life.

As much as I'd love to work in a linux-only environment they don't really exist in my area so I'd have to move or take a remote job that's radically different from what I'm accustomed to. And despite the MS annoyances I like my position a lot so I'm satisfied with fussing about MS online.

That said pretty pissed about the last 3 months of patch tuesday fuckery. KB5037765 ruined my week.

[-] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 32 points 10 months ago

It could be fun to implement this under *NIX for fun


cronjob to take screenshots, some OCR, throw it in a database...I'd never want to use this "feature" but as an academic exercise it could be a fun project.

But having it implemented by my OS, and not by me...yikes. No thanks.

[-] exu@feditown.com 7 points 10 months ago

Cron sadly does not offer precision in the seconds range.

[-] burrito82@feddit.de 23 points 10 months ago
[-] Dirk@lemmy.ml 66 points 10 months ago

Microsoft implements screenshot malware as Windows core feature that cannot be REALLY disabled without breaking the system.

[-] Malix@sopuli.xyz 47 points 10 months ago
[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 19 points 10 months ago

The only silver lining is that it might be relegated to ARM systems initially, so we've all got time to figure out a plan to shift to Linux.

[-] Voyajer@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Having Windows installed on your PC counts as permission right?

[-] CrazyEddie041@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

Acutis was beatified by Pope Francis in October 2020 after a first miracle was attributed to him, involving a Brazilian boy born with a pancreatic defect who said he was healed after praying to Acutis.

According to Vatican News, the news portal of the Holy See, the second miracle involved a Costa Rican woman whose daughter had a bicycle accident and was given a low chance of survival by doctors

Has the bar for "miracle" always been that low? People don't die around me all the time, can I be sainted?

[-] RustyNova@lemmy.world 41 points 10 months ago
[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 6 points 10 months ago

Bot responding to the wrong article? The saint one was nearby.

[-] CrazyEddie041@kbin.social 11 points 10 months ago

I'm... genuinely confused. My comment was definitely on the right post yesterday. I've never seen this thread. I blame kbin shenanigans.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 3 points 10 months ago

Interweb goblins.

[-] RiQuY@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago
[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago

Anyone know when it's being implemented?

this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
696 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

34866 readers
325 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS