1164
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 163 points 6 months ago

I guess I'm not surprised that programmers don't know how to follow meme standards.

The three panels following the first one are supposed to be helping the first one.

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 182 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I am altering the meme. Pray I do not alter it any further.

[-] Buttons@programming.dev 45 points 6 months ago

Senior developer here, it looks like they are helping to me.

[-] Midnight1938@reddthat.com 13 points 6 months ago

Sending you on a side quest isnt really helping efficiently

[-] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 6 months ago

But it is helping effectively.

It's less efficient to learn how to do something than to have somebody who knows how do it for you, but it's more effective to learn for yourself. Hard won knowledge is rarely lost.

[-] CertifiedBlackGuy@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Ha, tell that to my brain trying to recall what i learned in undergrad

!:'(!<

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Heads up, that spoiler syntax doesn't work on normal lemmy

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 6 months ago

Yeah but it's funny in a different way; they are giving ignorant and condescending advice because while big cats have impressive hunting abilities, they don't normally hunt mice.

[-] Remotedeck@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 6 months ago

The person you're responding to is giving advice in an ignorant and condescending way as a joke

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

Someone else already did. Marked as duplicate.

[-] SkyeStarfall 30 points 6 months ago

Part of language (which memes are a part of) is changing it to express new ideas and new forms of humor.

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago

Is anyone going to tell them about stack overflow, or...

[-] olutukko@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

how dare people alter the meaning of a meme? there are meme standards for a reason!! /s

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 10 points 6 months ago

We live in a society. We have laws. And order.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 6 months ago

This is a pretty old meme now. It's a bit late for that.

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 109 points 6 months ago

“Insufficient detail. Please ask a specific question.”

“Read the wiki”

“Nobody here is interested in holding your hand.”

[-] howrar@lemmy.ca 45 points 6 months ago

“Insufficient detail. Please ask a specific question.”

This is a very real problem from the answering side. So many people would rather have you guess what they're trying to ask and then get mad at you when you guess wrong.

[-] zurohki@aussie.zone 21 points 6 months ago

I know whenever I try to help someone with a Linux issue it's always an uphill battle to get them to stop guessing what they think the problem might be and show me the logs.

People really don't want to give you the information you need to help them.

[-] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

To be fair, people who know which logs to attach and how to get them usually already know enough to troubleshoot the issue by themselves.

[-] png@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 6 months ago

This is such a hard part of learning Linux. "Just look at the logs" Which logs? Where? How?

[-] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

journalctl > logs.txt (don't actually do this)

[-] zurohki@aussie.zone 4 points 6 months ago

You'd think so, but the logs often contain a ton of noise along with the one line that tells me what the actual issue is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] stufkes@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Yep. I do triage on potentially bad questions and this is probably the most common response I give.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 16 points 6 months ago

Stop, stop. It hurts, it's too real.

[-] alyth@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago
[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 76 points 6 months ago

“Relying on humans” is open to interpretation.

[-] OpenStars@discuss.online 13 points 6 months ago

For food. You know... nom nom (the humans as food I am hinting at!:-P).

[-] candyman337@sh.itjust.works 60 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I once submitted an issue to a devs GitHub. The apps login page would not load without large bg pictures loading first. I asked if he could add an option to disable it in the settings, as my self hosted site was slow.

I essentially got back, "why would I do that? It's not an issue for me! Besides the login page should load before the background picture" issue closed

😑😑😑😑

It's like you're SO CLOSE to seeing the issue.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 44 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

This image macro is supposed to be supportive

[-] revisable677@feddit.de 55 points 6 months ago

So was stackoverflow when it began

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 40 points 6 months ago

It's an X Y problem. Please retell the history, starting from your birth, that led to this moment before I contemplate answering your question

Signed, somebody who would rather waste your time than answer the bloody question.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[-] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 43 points 6 months ago

My for-profit large language model will not be stopped by your "anti commercial ai license" because it hasn't learned to read yet.

[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 25 points 6 months ago

Ive seen people link that one multiple times and i am at a loss what its about.

The cc 4.0 license it points to does not mention AI at all.

CC even has a page where they state that it probably is legal to train on cc protected content but it depends on context.

https://creativecommons.org/2023/08/18/understanding-cc-licenses-and-generative-ai/

I think someone used ai to mean attribution/alike, international. Which are part of the full name (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International) but still make little sense as an acronym next to CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 being the official acronym.

[-] my_hat_stinks@programming.dev 23 points 6 months ago

There's no point looking for logic. These people truly believe granting a licence restricts the rights of people who don't agree to the licence, which is the exact opposite of what licenses do. It's blatant misinformation but if you call them out on it (even by quoting their own link) they literally think you're an astroturfer for AI, because that makes more sense to them than the fact they're obviously wrong.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago

You don’t understand: these comment footers are the only thing between us and Roko's basilisk.

~ NOT FOR COMMERCIAL USE ~ PRIVATE MODE OF COMMUNICATION ~ NO STEP ON SNEK ~

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

i am at a loss what its about.

The only thing worse than the tech-bro's worshiping AI like it's the next messiah and we all must pave way for this revolutionary technology that will only seem to benefit white Americans with disposable income, are the people on the opposite end of the spectrum who are have a hysterical hatred for LLM's because their favorite Youtube streamers are getting clicks by ranting about how bad AI is. They are not being personally impacted by AI at all but are delusional enough to think that there will be laws and regulations and that AI will be "banned" if we all "raise awareness" and it's about as useful as the Bud Lite protests but not even remotely as entertaining.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] davel@lemmy.ml 34 points 6 months ago

Reporter: [REDACTED]
Reason: Spam/misinformation: Not an anti-AI licence.

This person may be confused, but still your tagline is a waste of mods’ time. And just speaking as a user I find it to be annoying visual pollution, especially since I think it’s ineffectual, unless your only goal is to “raise awareness.” Beyond that I think any effectiveness is about as plausible as that of sovereign citizenship.

[-] yokonzo@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago

Can confirm, the support forum crowd are dicks

[-] kamen@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago

"Catching mice is a stupid question."

[-] bulwark@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Well this makes me feel better about my stupid questions on stack overflow.

[-] embed_me@programming.dev 9 points 6 months ago

Look at this fancy person with enough reputation to ask a question

[-] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 4 points 6 months ago

I know you're trying to make a joke about SO's restrictive rep system, but asking and answering questions doesn't require reputation, at all. If anything, that's where you start building rep.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Emmie@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Hot muscular felines as coworkers? Sign me the f up

[-] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

is that tiger using a freebsd laptop

[-] itsnotits@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

It's* still deprecated

[-] pseudo@jlai.lu 2 points 6 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
1164 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

32497 readers
678 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS