930
submitted 7 months ago by CreateProblems@corndog.social to c/196

I don't think my lurking counts as breaking the rules, I'm just fulfilling my commitment late.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 110 points 7 months ago

Thankfully corporations aren't people.

[-] jared@mander.xyz 45 points 7 months ago

Amazing how many don't get that.

[-] clubb@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

Pretty sure the US law doesn't even understand that. Don't they have 2nd amendament rights?

[-] anton 19 points 7 months ago

Citizens united and some other cases mean that:

  • Cooperations have first amendment rights
  • Donating money is a form of speech protected by the first amendment
  • therefore bribery is legal as long as it goes through PACs and is not obviously quid pro quo
[-] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 7 points 7 months ago

They don't have the right to emancipation though. Like they are literally chattel. Weird how that part of personhood was overlooked, almost like the law was made ad-hoc to give their owners as much power as possible and not according to any real set of principles.

[-] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Corporate personhood is mostly for convenience. Otherwise a company would need an individual to buy and sell corporate property, and they would have to rearrange stuff like that whenever that person dies, retires, or does something else that restricts property use. And it means an individual wouldn't be able to be a tyrant for everyone else working at the company just because everything is in their name.

Importantly, it makes it much easier for customers to sue, since they only need to show the company wronged them in some way rather than an individual being personally responsible. Usually they would have no way of knowing who makes which decisions and has which responsibilities, and by suing the company as a whole. they don't have to. The same applies for governments, police departments, school boards, etc.

[-] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 months ago

If it's just for convenience then why were they given the right to speech which also happens to be a right to financial participation in the electoral process? You don't need those things to run a business, but you absolutely can use them to accelerate the corruption of society.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Then why does Delaware keep giving them the right to vote?

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

In Delaware they do have the right to vote in certain municipalities.

[-] hungryphrog 2 points 7 months ago

what the fuck

[-] PeachyMcPeachface 7 points 7 months ago

Idk about that but they can for sure vote in some US cities.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 4 points 7 months ago

How many people? Or corporations? Or did you mean politicians?

[-] soba@lemmy.ca 69 points 7 months ago

There's just something so pathetic about failing to start your dream company called X in 1999, and then twenty years later when your ultra rich buying some other company and renaming it X to try and finally feel like you won, you did it, you made a globally important social media company called x. The struggle is over. At last.

[-] InternetPerson@lemmings.world 38 points 7 months ago

globally important

This is continually decreasing.

It's even funnier that the website itself is still using "twitter" as URL.

[-] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 7 months ago

Well, not anymore. It's already fully migrated to x.com.

[-] Midnitte@beehaw.org 11 points 7 months ago

It still refers to itself as Twitter though. X referring to itself as twitter

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

I cannot prove this as it is a theory someone else proposed, but I sincerely believe that his obsession with the letter X is due to the fact that many native African tribes signed away all their rights and privileges with an X mark, since they were illiterate.

[-] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 68 points 7 months ago

Twitter didn't even want to change its name, that was forced on it by its abusive owner.

[-] spicytuna62@lemmy.world 45 points 7 months ago

Speaking of abusive owner, I saw a Cybertruck in the wild for the first time today. Pictures and videos don't do justice to how fucking atrocious those things are.

[-] CreateProblems@corndog.social 6 points 7 months ago

ME TOO! Yeah, it honestly doesn't look real.

[-] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 7 months ago

Am I really the only one who likes that design?
It looks futuristic.

[-] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 12 points 7 months ago

Seems that way, looks like ps1 car graphics

[-] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Because most other cars have become too similar and round.

[-] Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I personally don't like it, but I also think it could've looked better. The preproduction model they showed off had way better proportions compared to the final product, it actually looked like a car from a video game

[-] Chobeo@discuss.online 3 points 7 months ago

They seriously look like something Orange County Choppers would make to celebrate the fiftieth anniversary for a commercial stove manufacturer.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I did as well. My housemate that was with me asked if Tesla was doing some sort of promotion where people could just drive the things around. She didn't believe anyone would willingly buy something that looks like it was made for a '70s sci Fi C-movie.

You're correct that videos and pics don't manage to capture the true hideousness of that thing. Can't wait for the lawsuits when someone inevitably runs into a pedestrian with that front wedge. It's also weirdly smaller than I expected it to be. The one I saw parked next to a crossover car/SUV and was barely bigger than that thing.

[-] Vespair@lemm.ee 60 points 7 months ago

Small brain: Calling it X

Big brain: Calling it twitter

Galaxy brain: Not acknowledging that shithole at all

[-] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago

Free and open source brain: referring to the platform as Nitter

[-] stepan@lemmy.cafe 7 points 7 months ago

Nitter is dead though, right?

[-] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 months ago

https://nitter.poast.org still works

the only way to get it to work now iirc is to have it puppet actual accounts rather than guest accounts so it's a bit harder to do, but privacydevel made a fork that can do that

[-] stepan@lemmy.cafe 1 points 7 months ago

I see, thanks for the info.

[-] nothingcorporate@lemmy.world 54 points 7 months ago
[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 27 points 7 months ago

But he can start paying me if he wants me to call it X or whatever. I'd do so. For some $8 a day.

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

That's a deal at twice the price.

[-] SaintWacko@midwest.social 26 points 7 months ago

I just deadname buildings. Anyone been up the Sears Tower lately?

[-] AzzyDev@beehaw.org 2 points 7 months ago

not lately, no. I should go back there lol

[-] Asclepiaz@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Rose garden represent.

[-] NataliePortland@lemmy.ca 19 points 7 months ago

Fucking fuck yes

[-] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Deadnaming Corporations-In-General: chef's kiss

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Corporations ≠ people. I don't care what SCOTUS has to say on the matter. They have proven themselves to be illegitimate

[-] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 7 months ago

I’ve been known to deadname the one true church. Joseph Smith named it the Church of Christ, but the Mormon church is going through its little phase 💅 and insists on being called, and get this, no abbreviations allowed,

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

I got supremely lucky one day when they knocked on my door. I happened to be in the middle of carving up a full beef tenderloin flank into filets and tips, and was expecting company, so I didn't bother cleaning up, putting on a shirt, or even putting the butchers knife down.

So what they got to see was a 6'3" blonde haired, blue eyed, viking looking fucker open the door in shorts with blood covering my arms and the hand I was holding the knife in, (I took the time to wipe off one hand with wipes, dont want blood everywhere), who promptly yelled over his shoulder, "Hey guys you can let the goat go! I just found us a couple of virgins!"

They scarpered quickly.

[-] CEbbinghaus@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

Umm. I think you misspelled shitter

[-] cumskin_genocide@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

His momma name him Clay imma call him Clay.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

I will happily call it 'X' because it is a stupid name and one of the dumbest decisions Elon has made and tried to enforce. Why are we trying to protect him from his stupidity?

[-] hungryphrog 2 points 7 months ago

I'll be long gone before I start calling it "X"

[-] Thelaststandn@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I’ve been referring to it as “x formally known as twitter.com” every time I say it for months now.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
930 points (100.0% liked)

196

16708 readers
2094 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS