472
submitted 2 years ago by sam_uk@lemmy.world to c/worldnews@lemmy.world

She told Swedish media that she will not be appealing the verdict.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nothingcorporate@lemmy.world 238 points 2 years ago

Let me get this straight:

  • Destroying the planet for profit: LEGAL
  • Peacefully suggesting they shouldn't: ILLEGAL

The law has nothing to do with morality, no matter what anyone tells you.

[-] MasterObee@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago

Nobody has ever claimed laws are purely for morality.

[-] Perfide@reddthat.com 45 points 2 years ago

No, but there are tons of people who believe something is moral as long as it's legal, and even more people who believe something being illegal makes it inherently immoral.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Or like the line of a song goes:

This is not a court of justice, son

this is a court of law

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Thomas Aquinas: Am I a joke to you

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

I am afraid you have this very straight :/ I am so sick of our corporate-fascist world order. Big corporations are basically the worst dictator you can imagine, but with money dedicated to a PR department.

[-] Spzi@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

Yeah, imagine a 2D graph with axes going from legal to illegal, and legitimate to illegitimate.

Some things are legal although they are illegitimate (like 'Destroying the planet'), and others are illegal although they are legitimate (like some forms of civil disobedience or sabotage).

In an ideal world the two are aligned, but ours is not ideal. Also worth noting legal-illegal is rather objective, while legitimate-illegitimate is rather subjective.

I found Thoreau interesting on the topic, who commented being jailed for withholding taxes to not support the war: "The bars are meant to separate bad from good people".

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] gk99@lemmy.world 177 points 2 years ago

Of all the things to be guilty of these days, that's a pretty decent one.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 86 points 2 years ago

Disobeying the foot soldiers of capital is a core tenet of climate protesting. This is akin to charging a band for making noise.

[-] tacosplease@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago

She's getting into good trouble.

[-] Ghallo@lemmy.world 97 points 2 years ago

Harriet Tubman was also a criminal. Just about every single hero was technically a criminal.

[-] MercuryUprising@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago

I'm sure if Harriet Tubman was active today, she would be facing the same sort of bullshit as Greta. Probably worse thanks to her complexion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] poop 95 points 2 years ago
[-] reverie@lemmy.world 42 points 2 years ago

Based and gretapilled

[-] SmellyNinja@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Based as fuck

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 93 points 2 years ago

her punishment was a 2500 SEK fine? They've just told the entire country that we can pay the equivalent of a new bicycle to block oil tankers, this is amazing.

[-] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Dagsböter, though, so it is based on income.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 years ago

Which sorta just makes it better since it'll be lower if you're poor lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SmellyNinja@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

This seems like a very good trade.

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] bemenaker@lemmy.world 51 points 2 years ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Sweden found guilty of failing to obey world's leading scientists and researchers' calls for immediate drastic action against climate change.

[-] Pinto23@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

arrest Greta Thunberg

We did it, we arrested climate change!

[-] frostwhitewolf@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Sounds like a South Park episode

[-] TwoGems@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[-] MasterObee@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago
[-] Grimr0c@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago

Because she is a public figure and a politically exposed persons

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
472 points (100.0% liked)

worldnews

4968 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil. Disagreements happen, that does not give you the right to personally insult each other.

  2. No racism or bigotry.

  3. Posts from sources that aren't known to be incredibly biased for either side of the spectrum are preferred. If this is not an option, you may post from whatever source you have as long as it is relevant to this community.

  4. Post titles should be the same as the article title.

  5. No spam, self-promotion, or trolling.

Instance-wide rules always apply.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS