842
Another World is Possible (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 39 points 9 months ago

One of the greatest sci-fi authors.

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

One of the greatest fantasy authors

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago
[-] fogstormberry 37 points 9 months ago

thanks for sharing. I've been feeling pretty hopeless lately and this helped me today

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 9 months ago

Feel free to chill around here. I'm all about uplifting peeps!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] caboose2006@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 months ago

Remember, it took the black death and like 1/2 the population dying to bring about this change

[-] Denvil@lemmy.one 16 points 9 months ago

I mean the black death was like 450 years before the French revolution... I think it just took some angry French people for change

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 31 points 9 months ago

Divine right of kings simply morphed into capitalism. We didn't get rid of jack shit, and we never will.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 31 points 9 months ago

Feudalism is entirely different from Capitalism, which is entirely different from Socialism. Class dynamics have changed, and will change.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Feudalism is entirely different from Capitalism

Not really, no. Even though feudalism doesn't consider greed and resource hoarding inherently virtuous like capitalism does, both are at their core about the few rich and powerful exploiting and abusing the many poor and powerless through ownership of the necessities for life and a greater capacity for violence.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago

Both are class societies, yes. Both are fundamentally different relations of classes.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

There are differences, yes, but they're built on the same foundation and as such by definition NOT fundamentally different.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago

They don't have the same foundation. Aristocrat/serf dynamics are entirely different from Bourgeois/Proletarian relations.

Reading Marx would help you.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Aristocrat/serf dynamics are entirely different from Bourgeois/Proletarian relations.

They most certainly aren't.

Reading Marx would help you.

I have. Guess what: he wasn't right about everything.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago

Serfs have a certified existence, they do not sell their labor in a market. They work their land, without participating in Capitalism.

Proletarians do not have a certified existence. They compete against each other in a labor market.

The difference is stark despite both being working classes.

[-] burgersc12@mander.xyz 5 points 9 months ago

Capitalism is like Fuedalism in a trenchcoat

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago

It's a fundamentally different stage of class society with fundamentally different mechanics.

[-] burgersc12@mander.xyz 4 points 9 months ago

Fundamentally different? Lords are still in control, just now we call them "Billionaires" and act like the "Market" protects us.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago

Unlike serfs, workers must compete with each other as well as Capitalists. The Market protects nobody but the interests of Capital.

[-] essell@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

I agree These systems both emerged from inherent humanity, not conspiracy.

[-] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

That would make sense for capitalism, if humanity didn't have to have its permanent, essential characteristics beaten, traumatised and groomed out of them with land seizures, branding, whipping, workhouses, schools, prisons, debtors prisons, being forced to sell their children, slavery and the threat of homelessness and starvation for hundreds of years.

People didn't just accept either of those two systems and there's nothing remotely inherent about them. They were both forced on people through violence or the threat of it.

[-] essell@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

.They were both forced on people through violence or the threat of it.

And so is revealed the violence inherent to the system.

[-] Phegan@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

Not to piss in the lemonade, but some places still have the divine right of kings.

[-] stiephel@feddit.de 11 points 9 months ago

If Charles is the divine choice, why did he get cancer?

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago
[-] stiephel@feddit.de 6 points 9 months ago

Bro wants a refund

[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 11 points 9 months ago

The point is that societies could progress past it, that it's not inescapable.

So the fact that there are still absolute monarchies does not invalidate that societies that are better are possible, like most of our societies today.

Every empire seems unassailable and eternal, until it doesn't. The USSR seemed like it will last beyond our lifetimes, until it didn't.

[-] buzz86us@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

Capitalism doesn't even work in the US prices ate kept high

[-] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I'm trying to parse your sentence. Can you use punctuation?

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

Capitalism doesn't even work in the US. Prices are kept high.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Rolando@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

I've only read two books of Le Guin's, and they were both memorable:

The second one is more relevant to this meme.

[-] TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Absolutely 100% run (don't walk!) and get The Left Hand of Darkness. It is easily one of the best sci-fi/fantasy books I have ever read.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DrJenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube 3 points 9 months ago

The Dispossessed had been in my backlog for a while now. I really need to get to it.

[-] endlessvoid@reddthat.com 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I just finished the dispossessed. Didn't find it as compelling as reviews had me hoping. The sci-fi depiction of anarchism wasn't flattering and the main character wasn't easy to like either.

Spoiler and trigger alert: I put the book down for a while after he sexually assaulted a woman, but eventually finished it and wasn't impressed by the ending or by the fact that his assault was glossed over and not mentioned again.

[-] Rolando@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Yes, that's a fair assessment. It's not an enjoyable book and to some extent isn't meant to be -- the cover of the version I read said something about an "ambiguous utopia," the story structure is pretty far from a Campbellian Hero's Journey, and the main character is not relatable. The book is more memorable than enjoyable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ConstantPain@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I met a traveller from an antique land,

Who said—“Two vast and trunkless legs of stone

Stand in the desert. . . . Near them, on the sand,

Half sunk a shattered visage lies, whose frown,

And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,

Tell that its sculptor well those passions read

Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,

The hand that mocked them, and the heart that fed;

And on the pedestal, these words appear:

My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!

Nothing beside remains. Round the decay

Of that colossal Wreck, boundless and bare

The lone and level sands stretch far away.”

Shelley’s Poetry and Prose (1977)

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 12 points 9 months ago

Kings had nothing on capitalism. You could overthrow a king.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago

You can overthrow Capitalism, it weakens itself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BigBenis@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The problem is that this time we've likely got a few decades at the most to form a movement before a huge chunk of the world becomes uninhabitable and society crumbles under the weight of war and famine.

Looking at how things are going, I have little hope that the majority of people are willing to let go of the status quo.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Maeve@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago

I agree with the sentiment and also wonder if she's still ferociously pro-copyright?

[-] flora_explora@beehaw.org 5 points 9 months ago

She died about 6 years ago

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Bruh she died

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

and look where that got kings, EATEN

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
842 points (100.0% liked)

Lefty Memes

5007 readers
344 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS