285

Most powerful Republican in Congress complains he has no influence: Mitch McConnell has admitted he can’t control the Republican Party. (newrepublic.com)

submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

One of Congress’s most powerful Republicans apparently feels powerless in the face of Donald Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign.

Sitting for an interview with CBS’s Face the Nation on Sunday, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell explained that he didn’t see any other option than to endorse the GOP presidential nominee—despite having made previous declarations against Trump, including blaming him for the violent events that unfolded on January 6.

“The issue is, what kind of influence, even if I had chosen to get involved in the presidential election, what kind of influence would I have had?” McConnell said after insinuating he was duty-bound as the most powerful Republican in the Senate to support the candidate that Republican delegates voted for.

top 30 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] drislands@lemmy.world 113 points 6 months ago

The man has been leading by example for years. Remember when, during the Obama presidency, he refused to even call a vote on any Supreme Court nominees?

He has shown time and time again that he doesn't care about the unwritten gentleman's rules that the government has been (more or less) abiding by for centuries, and now he's shocked that his party is overrun by people with zero interest in working towards anything other than destruction?

He's a fool and he's dragged us down with him.

[-] OpenStars@discuss.online 5 points 6 months ago

He's a patsy - a convenient face to focus our attention on while the real actors function behind the scenes. As the magician says, "please focus all of your attention on this hand over here..."

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Ah yes, the Deep Illuminati

[-] grue@lemmy.world 60 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Of course you had options, you traitorous piece of shit:

You could refuse to endorse Trump
You could switch parties and become a Democrat
You could resign
You could kill yourself

You had tons of options, but you'd rather let democracy burn anyway.

[-] fireweed@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

Wouldn't even have to become a Democrat: the "independent" label exists

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

Or he could have not stolen a court seat.

He could have not backstabbed everyone and everything.

Alas, he's a piece of shit.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Hell he could kill a coworker. Mitch McConnell shooting up the RNC would be an interesting turn of events

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 53 points 6 months ago

"I have no power to stop this" says man who refused to even try to use the ACTUAL POWER HE HAD stop this

Fuck off and die McConnell, preferably in the most painful way possible. He refused to impeach the fucker, so this is just whining to try to protect his legacy, but this is 10000% his fault.

[-] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 43 points 6 months ago

Doddering pensioner wonders why he has no control

[-] whodatdair 36 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

“Wait, why isn’t the monster I’ve created listening to me??”

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago

It's a bit worse than that - they're following the path he laid down... he just likes to seem like he has no control when they're acting heinous, but if they get the house and senate again he'd be happy to install more conservative judges.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 38 points 6 months ago

That's some amazing logic.

I have absolutely no power and am utterly helpless. I'll stay in the job.

[-] halferect@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago

"I'm shocked after creating this monster I'm unable to control it" - mitch McConnell

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 6 points 6 months ago

"Hey Mitch, you won't be able to control this monster"- Everyone, for ten years.

"Idfc lol, I'm old and rich-" Mitch

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago

He could absolutely control it, he just doesn't want to make any hard choices.

[-] halferect@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I'm not sure at this point mitch could control MAGA, even trying to pull weight with any remaining classic Republicans probably wouldn't have any chance of reining in the party back from full on MAGA since a lot still are thinking of reelection and going against MAGA is a career ender

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

If only there was a classic book everyone knows about to warn him

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

He should fuck off and die.

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

I need to pick up some fireworks for when that traitor finally dies.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 12 points 6 months ago

Once you announce retirement, you're lame duck. This is not news to McConnell or anyone else.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Well, well, well... If it isn't the consequences of my own actions.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 9 points 6 months ago

Absolute scum.

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

I don’t think he can control his own sphincter.

[-] HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social 8 points 6 months ago

So, in order to avoid having no influence, you use all of your influence to advance someone else's ends? Idk man, seems like you could have told Trump to eat a dick on national TV, told the Republican senators that you were never going to have a better chance to get rid of his ass, and voted to convict and bar him from politics if it passed.

Sure, I don't get to be a senator, but the fuck would I want to be a senator for, if that was the price of entry? You get to be a pawn, and get played? Pass, old man.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

“The issue is, what kind of influence, even if I had chosen to get involved in the presidential election, what kind of influence would I have had?”

What a worm.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

You cannot control a room full of demented dogs with terminal rabies.

[-] bquintb@midwest.social 5 points 6 months ago

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Don’t worry Bitch, Putin does.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Under the fool's watchless eye cretins rise.

[-] taanegl@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

He is a useful idiot, yes.

this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024

285 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19126 readers

2117 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News