228
submitted 6 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] psvrh@lemmy.ca 95 points 6 months ago

The Right Wing is really good at working the refs, and the Left needs to catch a Clue: they're going to get called radical socialist Marxist communist anarchists no matter what they do, so they should get off the knees, stop being such appeasers and fight.

Own the label

[-] hark@lemmy.world 40 points 6 months ago

Democrats are not the left.

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

I didn't see a mention of democrats.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

The left isn't afraid of being called "radical socialist Marxist communist anarchists" so I assumed they were talking about democrats who are.

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 months ago

Democrats are not the ones out there protesting for Palestine.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Right, the protesters aren't being "appeasers", they're fighting. It's the democrats who are being appeasers and afraid of being called "radical socialist Marxist communist anarchists" so my conclusion is that they were talking about democrats.

[-] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Ooohh that's what you meant. Haha. Thanks for the context!

[-] whoreticulture 40 points 6 months ago

What do they mean "trap laid by the right". These college administrators are conservatives.

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

So when "leftists" in office are calling for ending "antisemtic" protests on campus, does that make them part of the right?

[-] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Those people aren't leftists obviously. They're likely liberals

[-] Dearth@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

What evidence is there that college administrators are leftists?

[-] Potatofish@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

In my book, I plug every outlet. Please buy my book!

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

They mention it once in the whole article? But that’s half the stuff on The Conversation. No different from interviews on most news programs

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Tin soldiers and Nixon's coming

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

The student and nonstudents are helping with that trap.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 months ago

By protesting obvious atrocities?

this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
228 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19118 readers
2643 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS