370
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] zcd@lemmy.ca 67 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

So theoretically the current president could fire up seal team 6 and clean house…

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

Why just use one SEAL team? Much quicker if you use them all.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Why use a team at all? As commander in chief doesn't Biden get touch any gun he wants?

He could just set up an XM250 and blast all the Justices he doesn't like as they leave court.

Mr. Biden, how did you restore legitimacy to the courts? Well I just started blasting...

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Dick Cheney has entered the chat, as an example of why elderly people might not be the best people to be pulling the trigger.

[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 10 points 6 months ago

SEAL team 6 is not an actual SEAL team, they are a special counterterrorist group instead of naval special forces. Their name was to confuse the Soviets in 1980.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Implies the existence of at least 5 other SEAL teams. ;)

Or the old X-Men quote:

[-] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Send in all the seals

[-] JonEFive@midwest.social 1 points 6 months ago

Hey now, this court case is about the presidential ability to assassinate rivals, not the presidential ability to use the armed forces against American citizens on American soil. We would need the national guard for that.

[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 56 points 6 months ago

they wished the US was a bit more like Russia don't they?

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 6 months ago

Even Putin has to use methods more subtle than sending a strike team after his political opponents. Nowadays there are a handful of monarchs that have full legal immunity on paper but I don't think any of them wants to highlight that they could just outright murder someone with impunity. Trump's team picking this example as a consequence of their deranged legal theory sounds completely bonkers to me.

[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 9 points 6 months ago

Eh, Putin does send the GRU after political enemies. I don't think Prigozhin was killed by harshly worded letters, and the London sightseeing brigade was also not just some random guys.

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 6 months ago

He made one look like an accident and tried to blame Czechia for the other. It's a bit different than claiming publicly that he has the right to kill everyone he wants.

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

The end goal of the right is to do away with all the subtlety they have to do now, so the general population will just follow all their commands without any talkbacks, like "a good chiild does it to the words of their parents". (Viktor Orbán allegedly said that the average voter is on the mentality of a 12 year old child.)

[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 4 points 6 months ago

With the Hungarian education system, I think he was doing the average voter favours there. Wonder why it's becoming more and more underfunded.

[-] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 3 points 6 months ago

lol yea, even in Russia the headlines are always “person falls mysteriously out of window” and not “Putin stabs opponent in face with knife, lets out evil laugh”

[-] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 51 points 6 months ago

So let me get his straight. Trumps lawyers are trying to legalize Biden killing Trump? So even his own lawyers prefer him to die instead of becoming president again.

[-] Revonult@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Trump's lawyers are trying to delay his other trials. Create BS arguments that require a ruling before his other trials can proceed, elevate it to Supreme Court, run out the clock, hope he gets elected before other cases find him guilty.

Edit: Spelling

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Once the election is over, there's no real incentive to pursue these cases, either. Good chance they all get dropped even if he loses.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

That's not how this works. They will keep going because he committed real crimes

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

That's simply not how the US legal system works

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

I saw a post elsewhere about this suggesting that Biden send SEAL teams to camp out on the steps of the courthouse where Trump is on trial in NYC, the steps of the Supreme Court, etc. Don’t give them any orders beyond them being stationed there.

If SCOTUS says it’s ok then Biden just orders the SEALs to immediately take out Trump, the SCOTUS justices (well, we know which ones, specifically). Etc.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

It would be red meat for conservatives, to be sure. But also, consider the politics of your average Navy Seal...

An army of Dan Crenshaws

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

The Navy in particular tends to lean left. Not all of them obviously, but I knew some pretty left leaning SEALs when I was a Nuke.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Left relative to other military branches. But when you stack that up against the Fundie Death Cult that is the Air Force and the Hillbilly Hoosegow that is the Marines, that's a low bar.

[-] ours@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

It would be a mistake to turn this con man into a martyr. There are already enough baffling conspiracies with him as the main character.

[-] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

See, that would be poetic justice

[-] RoseTintedGlasses 29 points 6 months ago

Please, Joe Biden, please just do this one thing and presidentially pardon yourself

[-] sibannac@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Do we really want Trump to be a martyr? We will end up with him being deified by his followers who already want to believe he's the second coming.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 28 points 6 months ago

Betcha he's got a hit list set up already.

[-] cannibalkitteh 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Maybe he'll mix up the lists and end up getting the Federalist Society picks?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

There's no question that he has an enemies list.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

Would make the debates a lot more interesting.

Biden: "Your lawyers successfully argued before the Supreme Court, that a President has immunity even from assassinating rivals." (places gun on podium) "Let's have a serious talk about that."

[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

It's a brave stance to take for the lawyer of the president's political rival, but I can think of worse ways to get rid of a particularly problematic client.

[-] chalk46@kbin.social 10 points 6 months ago

so either Trump winds up dead or in prison, win/win

this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
370 points (100.0% liked)

News

23353 readers
2734 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS