63
TikTok’s Pro-China Tilt (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg to c/news@lemmy.world

The times dives into an intelligence report on how TikTok's political algorithm anomalies align with the CCP's Geostrategic Objectives https://networkcontagion.us/wp-content/uploads/A-Tik-Tok-ing-Timebomb_12.21.23.pdf

This report highlights major differences in the prevalence of hashtags related to subjects like Hong Kong Protests, Tainanmen Square, Tibet, the South China Sea, Taiwan, Uyghurs, Pro-Ukraine, and Pro-Isreal when compared to other major social media platforms.

Additionally the times cited a Wall Street Journal analysis (https://www.wsj.com/tech/tiktok-israel-gaza-hamas-war-a5dfa0ee) which "found evidence that TikTok was promoting extreme content, especially against Israel. (China has generally sided with Hamas.)"

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ranvier@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

Here's a figure from the actual research the articles are describing and linked inside:

https://networkcontagion.us/wp-content/uploads/A-Tik-Tok-ing-Timebomb_12.21.23.pdf

This is based on methodology TikTok itself suggested be done, comparing posts on TikTok to Instagram.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

As someone who has been neutral on the whole TikTok sale/ban issue, this is the most damning thing I’ve seen.

And I am not defending Israel here but I wonder if TikTok’s promotion of anti-Israel content is part of why young people have been so visible in demonstrating against Israel.

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

And I am not defending Israel here but I wonder if TikTok’s promotion of anti-Israel content is part of why young people have been so visible in demonstrating against Israel.

I've been seriously wondering this since this morning as well/I'm in a similar position.

[-] princessnorah 2 points 5 months ago

I think you missed a crucial bit of info that makes this graph make more sense: "Normal ratios, given Instagram’s larger user base". Which explains why the control groups are the way they are.

[-] stanleytweedle@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

Thanks for posting this. I admit I'm of the opinion that this kind of evidence is moot because even the potential for a foreign adversary to have this kind of public manipulation and intelligence gathering tool in place is an unacceptable risk. But it's good to see people taking the time to dig into the data to make an even clearer case.

And the chorus goes: "But whatabout Facebook!"

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 6 points 5 months ago

I largely agree, but when I got the email from the times this morning I went "Why aren't you guys posting this front page!? People need to know about this research. This isn't just a hypothetical risk anymore!"

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

I would worry about this more if the American social media networks didn't have a pro-corporate tilt.

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I think there's a pretty strong argument that a pro-corporate tilt doesn't result in a difference in content promotion regarding Tibet, Tiananmen Square, Hong Kong, and/or Uyghur.

You could argue the US military industrial complex might push South China Sea, pro-Taiwan, pro-Ukraine, and pro-Isreal content; that seems distant enough from (e.g.) Facebook, but I'm not sure how we'd tell. We don't have a major social media platform in a place like (e.g.) Switzerland to study (granted, the way Proton is expanding they might try).

In any case, I do think it's pretty damning for TikTok's claims of independence that China's direct conflicts, Tiananmen Square and Hong Kong are basically suppressed to the point of being nil (EDIT: Tibet is also a direct conflict of sorts but isn't talked about as much from what I've seen on "western social media" and could be conditionally filtered ... there's still probably a fair bit of "Tibet" content that exists outside of the "bad for the CCP" space).

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

I think there’s a pretty strong argument that a pro-corporate tilt doesn’t result in a difference in content promotion regarding Tibet, Tiananmen Square, Hong Kong, and/or Uyghur.

How about a difference in content promotion regarding Israel? You know, the country the MiC makes a huge amount of money supporting?

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 6 points 5 months ago

Read past the first paragraph...

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

I did. My apologies, I saw pro-Taiwan, but somehow missed the pro-Israel next to it.

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 6 points 5 months ago

Okay, then yeah; I think we're in agreement more research would be needed (and difficult!).

I can't dissuade or dismiss your point ... but I am personally less convinced there is a correlation.

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

We also need to take into account how addressable the problems are in the current climate. To tackle pro-corporate biases, we're looking at a long quest that runs counter to the underlying fabric of our society. It's a fundamentally anti-capitalist proposition and we live in a capitalist society.

This issue with a foreign power is much smaller, and thus easier to crack. It's much less far-reaching, it's less important. But it should still lead to small gains in the improvement of the information sphere.

[-] impure9435@kbin.run 8 points 5 months ago

Downvoted by .ml/hexbear trolls

[-] forked_bytes@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago

So they found less propaganda on TikTok. Good to know!

[-] mindlight@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago
  • surprised Pikachu! -
[-] Hello_there@fedia.io 2 points 5 months ago

I just hope that the result of forcing the sale of tiktok doesn't result in Facebook owning it

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

There's a good chance the (current) FTC wouldn't let that happen.

I could see Microsoft or possibly Apple taking an interest. They're big players without a social media platform, that have the cash to buy and run one.

this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
63 points (100.0% liked)

News

23177 readers
2834 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS