730
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by Hotmailer@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] GrymEdm@lemmy.world 119 points 10 months ago
[-] uriel238 53 points 10 months ago

Inconveniencing protests that go unrecognized or are criminalized lead to the next step: industrial sabotage.

Maybe Google needs to lose a few servers to captured NSO malware.

[-] Luisp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 10 months ago
[-] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 24 points 10 months ago

Well they actually changed the motto because "don't be evil" was too ambiguous. The motto now is "do the right thing". It's now okay to be evil, as long as you're "doing the right thing".

[-] eronth@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Yeah, of all the things google has done, rewrite "don't be evil" is really not one of them. Didn't their parent company also pick up the motto as well?

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

"Do evil and hide it for long enough such that people can't do much about it later when they find out about it"? DEAHIFLESTPCDMAILWTFOAI for short?

[-] bitwaba@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Use two tildes (~) before and after:

Google: don't be ~~evil~~

Google: don't be ~~evil~~

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 9 points 10 months ago

more like google: ~~dont~~ be evil

[-] bitwaba@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I don't know, I kind of like the idea of someone deciding their company motto is to not exist at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Don't be? Evil! A la Lionel Hutz

[-] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

Say hello to Miguel Sanchez.

[-] dsemy@lemm.ee 29 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Who would've thought an evil company would mistreat its employees. They literally work for a corporation whose main business involves violating your human rights, if they really care they wouldn't have worked there in the first place.

[-] LoveSausage@lemmy.ml 29 points 10 months ago

Instead they should just work for all those good companies that's everywhere under capitalism. Workers don't have a say in company policy and companies are as bad as they can be. The fact that nestle murder more people than Fazer , isn't about that one is more "evil" than the other, it's what they can get away with. Evil is a childish concept.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Am I being an idiot for thinking that protesting like this, when the union is relatively small is counterproductive? I'd think I'd want to represent the majority of the workers, then protest or outright strike which will halt the cloud operations they want to halt, if that's what the majority of union members vote to do.

[-] noxy@yiffit.net 7 points 10 months ago

Doesn't matter, even if it was just two workers it's still protected concerted activity which is illegal to retaliate against.

[-] whoreticulture 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'm sure they'd love to have enough supporters to do a general strike, and those have been proposed and attempted over Gaza. Unfortunately, opposing Israel's genocidal actions is not the mainstream view... especially being opposed enough to participate in activism. With only a handful of people, these sit-ins were able to disrupt the company and make news.

[-] WallEx@feddit.de 5 points 10 months ago

So You think they shouldn't have done anything, because the union is not big enough? Moral is not an option with a small union? Am I getting this right?

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I think it depends on the goal. If I'm trying to stop a corporation from doing something profitable a large union, one that contains most corpo workers, including the ones producing this profit, can strike, halting the production that generates this profit. The union could do this for a moral reason. If the union however contains for the sake of argument 1% of the workers and none of the ones doing the work in question, then staging a protest can't force a stop to the morally reprehensible production. It also makes this 1% an easy target to get rid of thus making it harder to organize more workers needed to stop production. So if I wanted to gain this power over the corpo, I would probably protest outside of union capacity.

E: They're already gone..

[-] WallEx@feddit.de 4 points 10 months ago

Yeah, american employee protection sucks ... Where I live you could easily fight being fired for this. So maybe thats where our different stances come from.

[-] gian@lemmy.grys.it 3 points 10 months ago

If there is a criminal charge or conviction I think you would be fired in most countries.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This is probably why they called the cops, so they can fire them for an obvious cause and not have to deal with any questions.

[-] WallEx@feddit.de 2 points 10 months ago

What would be the crime here? Am I missing something? Protesting is not (or shouldn't be) against the law, as long as you don't behave illegally)

[-] gian@lemmy.grys.it 3 points 10 months ago

Reports seems to indicate that they were arrested for trespassing.

[-] WallEx@feddit.de 3 points 10 months ago

Ah that, yeah they were in the CEOs office. That might be misdemeanor, but is it a felony? Pretty sure you couldn't be fired for this here.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] locke@sopuli.xyz 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Does this mean there are new open positions at Google?

[-] Sneptaur@pawb.social 63 points 10 months ago

"Hmm, these people got arrested for being against genocide. Sounds like a great place for me to work!"

I sure hope you're joking

[-] uriel238 12 points 10 months ago

You may underestimate the ongoing desperation for paid full time work with benefits in the US.

A lot of folk are one paycheck, one tragedy, one road accident or severe sickness away from homelessness.

And homelessness is already criminalized in some counties.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] locke@sopuli.xyz 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Well, I probably cannot get in there anyway so it's a bit moot. Plus it would mean a major relocation. But yeah, I'd happily work on an Israel contract.

[-] Sneptaur@pawb.social 33 points 10 months ago

Wow, that's disgusting. Have you no morals? Shame on you.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 26 points 10 months ago

"I sold my moral compass to ~~Lockheed Martin~~ Google for 90k/year and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt"

[-] pivot_root@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

$200k a year and a pizza party are what his morals are worth, apparently.

[-] locke@sopuli.xyz 3 points 10 months ago

Are you trying to be funny?

[-] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

Are you? You have zero issues with 10s of thousands of innocent people being murdered?

[-] uriel238 5 points 10 months ago

Some of us can resent the genocide committed in the name of our state and civilization, or condoned by our state, while simultaneously being desperate for our personal welfare and also fearing the rising trends of genocide in our own nation, hence we may not only work for genocide-supporting companies to stay alive, but also vote for genocide-condoning neoliberals to vote against fascists.

I hate being in a position like this (and personally don't have to work for any company) but here in the States were imminently fucked and only pushing the fuckery down the calandar.

And few Germans from the days of the reich were forgiven, so I suspect in the aftermath only those Americans who were fed to our detention centers and prisons will ultimately be forgiven, if even them.

[-] whoreticulture 6 points 10 months ago

If you're so desperate, work for a restaurant or something. Google isn't your only option, I've lived in the high-cost-of-living bay area with all sorts of jobs, including minimum wage jobs. You can make it work without working for Google ffs

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Maeve@kbin.social 29 points 10 months ago

Friendly reminder: There will always be scabs

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

position to be removed as downsizing opportunity following termination

[-] WallEx@feddit.de 4 points 10 months ago

Wow, a genuine genocide supporter, would you look at that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Prethoryn@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I am seeing a lot of comments on here but the context not being mentioned is that they were protesting while clocked in or working on the clock.

Google is technically in authority to do that. The article is worded a bit out of context to make the act of protesting an a big company we all find to be evil more evil for letting employees go that were wasting company time.

I get it before you even type it I understand Google isn't short on money and the time portion won't effect them but has the employees protested while clocked out this would have been a less likely outcome and I also get it, "yeah they would have fired them anyway." Sure believe what you want but it doesn't take away that Google had the authority to fire while the employees were in their time no matter what they were protesting. If I did this at my job and was getting paid they would fire me as well.

EDIT: Lemmy is Reddit but it's full of users in denial.

[-] diffusive@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Confidentially incorrect: at Google there is no clock in and no clock out (for employees, contractors is different). At Google you can work 1h per day or 20h per day you earn the same. Performances are assessed on the output not on the hour worked.

So, no, find another reason for which Google is right. Popular topic is “they disrupt other people work by making noise” (of course people can work on a laptop in another place because there is generally no special equipment at the desk but details) or “they destroyed properties… you cannot see in the picture but they destroyed millions of precious bacteria on the floor”

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Sp00kyB00k@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

That's the point of protest. The rules are made to keep the status quo, not be good. And some rules suck balls.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

does your job support a genocidal theocratic ethnostate?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago

It wouldn't be a very effective protest if they did it on their own time lol

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
730 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

64075 readers
5278 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS