351
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Drinvictus@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 7 months ago

The whole internet loves Kagi

Lol no

Also Kagi is a glorified Google front end.

This is a reference to the milkshake duck tweet

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 16 points 7 months ago

I'll be honest, I wanted to like Kagi because Google has become so useless. But I've not had any better success finding things on it than Google.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mii@awful.systems 16 points 7 months ago

I was delighted to find a sci-fi story hidden between pages full of AI shilling on the website, and then disappointed because it's not even funny-bad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 7 months ago

He missed the opportunity of just replying unsubscribe or signing the CEO up for cat facts.

[-] ebu@awful.systems 13 points 7 months ago

i was impressed enough with kagi's by-default deranking/filtering of seo garbage that i got a year's subscription a while back. good to know that this is what that money went to. suppose i'll ride out the subscription (assuming they don't start injecting ai garbage into search before then) and then find some other alternative

switching topics, but i do find it weird how the Brave integration stuff (which i also only found out about after i got the subscription) hadn't... bothered me as much? to be exceptionally clear, fuck Brandon Eich and Brave -- the planet deserves fewer bigots, crypto grifters, and covid conspiracists -- but i can't put my finger on why Kagi paying to consume Brave's search API's just doesn't cause as much friction with me. honestly it could be the fact that when i pay for Kagi it doesn't feel like i'm bankrolling Eich and his ads-as-a-service grift, whereas the money for my subscription is definitely paying for Vlad to ~~reply-guy into bloggers' inboxes who are critical of the way Kagi operates~~ correct misunderstandings about Kagi.

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 7 months ago

I mean, I think the harassment is unwarranted and clearly the CEO thinks he's too important to be ignored. But the content of the email itself seems to make sense to me. Am I missing something?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
351 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1425 readers
205 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS