106
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by SpiceDealer@lemmy.world to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world

If you ever find yourself tempted to buy a truck and/or SUV, just remember one thing: they're not worth it. They're a societal nuisance. They're a massive pollutant. The maintenance, repair, and insurance will cost you a whole lot more. Aside from the aforementioned pollution, They're overall environmental impact is egregious. These monstrosities are best left alone.

If you ever have to do any sort heavy work, rent one instead. Want to live that outdoors lifestyle? A sedan and/or hatchback will do. Just buy a bike and roof rack. Got a family? Again, sedan and/or hatchback will do but also consider a station wagon. Better yet, buy a cargo bike like the Urban Arrow or the Dutch bakfiets. These are way better options to those climate-changing abominations.

I know what I'm writing isn't anything groundbreaking but I'm writing this mostly get something off my chest in relation to a dream I had last night. The dream itself was quite boring: I was driving around in a new Ford Bronco. The thing was that, in the dream, I was quite happy about it. This happy feeling was still felt when I woke up. For a brief moment, I was thinking about buying a Bronco. I soon returned to reality. But I'm not going to lie; the temptation was strong. The temptation was made stronger by nostalgia. I grew up with these kinds of vehicles. My dad worked in labor-intense, blue collar jobs that used trucks. He even owned some himself. But, once again, they're not worth it.

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] IMongoose@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

I think it's funny that you overlooked vans like most people do. Vans make more sense for way more people than trucks and SUVs do. But they have a huge stigma attached to them and people don't want to look uncool.

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

Except vans aren't actually all that efficient, compare a Toyota Hiace VS Hilux, or ford Ranger vs Transit, and they are very similar in size and economy, with the Hilux actually being more efficient than the Hiace.

The biggest reason so many people have utes or pickups where I live is for towing, and the ability to carry five passengers and have luggage in a separate compartment.

I drive a van for work, and I'm well aware of how practical they are, but it only has one row of seats, can't tow bugger all, and would get stuck on wet grass.

[-] Leviathan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

My girlfriend's sister has a van she uses for Vanlife™ and that big stupid piece of lumbering shit gets stored 10 to 11 months of the year because driving it for regular things is totally unaffordable. It's just as gas inefficient and gigantic as the child killers.

[-] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I think the point is that even if you need to haul stuff frequently, a van will do the job way better than a truck

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

Just fix the laws in the US, and pickups and trucks for personal use will be as about nonexistent as in Europe.

[-] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 year ago

Yeah, they have their place as working vehicles. Unfortunately too many are just pavement princess trucks. They might haul a few hundred pounds (not counting the driver) a few times a year.

It's the mindset of fear and envy that underpins consumerism that needs to change.

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 year ago

No, the huge american pickuptrucks does not have a place as working vehicles, the are too big and too fragile, get a WV Transport pickup or van, way more practical than a huge F-150 or similar

[-] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It's absolutely not easier to rent a truck 10 times a year. You people just assume that people don't need or use this shit from one old ass survey.

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago

I never mentioned renting?

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's just not a realistic idea, especially considering the time it takes to do so, and that you can only get one during working hours.

[-] The_v@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Basic economics....

If the demand is there, the supply of rentals will become available.

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I've rented a truck before, no way would I want to do it ten times a year. What a pain in the ass.

[-] leetamus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Trucks don’t innately get worse mileage and not all trucks are big. Also, a new vehicle, including big trucks, will be better on the environment than a 20yr old wagon. Age is more relevant than model. You seem to be off track here.

[-] PureTryOut@lemmy.kde.social 6 points 1 year ago

*bakfiets. Don't forget the s.

It's a bike (fiets) with a bin/container (bak) in front of it.

Anyway, I think you're preaching to the choir here.

[-] SpiceDealer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

You're very much right. Like I said in the post, this was intended as something of a personal log entry rather than a thought-provoking discussion. I get very tempted to buy these pieces of shit when I know that I don't need them. I vaguely mentioned the "outdoors lifestyle" since that's one of the biggest appeals to consumers. What they fail to realize is that a mountain bike or even a simple hike offer a better off-roading experience. Also, thank you for the spell check.

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I think you should live your dream and buy that Bronco. It'll take you places no pushbike will, and with more gear and food.

Or drive it to the trailhead, and continue on foot.

[-] vividspecter@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

True, although these posts do reach /all from time to time.

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Buy that Bronco, OP. See the country in it. Go camping, experience the great outdoors. Meet new people.

That vehicle will take you places no van or station wagon possibly could.

You know you want to.

[-] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

You’re like a vegan hating on meat eaters or a closet gay hating on the openly gay. Basically your self imposed voluntary abstinence is causing you to dislike those who are just living their lives how you want to. Just get a Bronco, or whatever. Live and let live.

The latest Toyota Highlander Hybrid, as well as the Sienna, get 35 mpg city and highway. That’s under 3 gal per 100 miles. A Subaru Outback (about the only wagon in the states) will consume 4 gallons per 100 miles. That’s more than 30% more fuel for a wagon.

I have an SUV and a Tern HSD. A cargo bike is a replacement for a second vehicle, not a single vehicle. EV is also great as a second vehicle. But for a vehicle serving all the needs of a family (safety, transportation, outdoor recreation) a modern mid-size SUV is optimal. Not too big to park, not too small to fit stuff camping, safe, fuel efficient.

Why not hate on families with two or more cars, regardless what kind they are? Or hate on large square footage houses - those have a huge energy impact. Or you could just not worry about what other people do. It’s not like we’re all flying private jets…

[-] PedestrianError@towns.gay 7 points 1 year ago

@antlion If you’re taking criticism of your vehicle personally, there’s probably a reason you feel the need to be defensive about it. We all have room for personal improvement, but we won’t solve the problem at the personal level. We have to change the incentives to industry that are creating such unsustainable levels of consumption across the board. In the meantime anyone considering an SUV or multiple cars or a big house should think critically about it. @SpiceDealer

[-] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

The focus shouldn’t be fuel economy of SUV, but danger to pedestrians and auto-centric development. I don’t really like my vehicle all that much, but it’s not a gas guzzler. Part of the reason I feel compelled to drive my tank around is not just the raised trucks but the increasing mass of EVs. Model Y is really heavy and compact vehicles don’t stand a chance.

[-] eLJay@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

at least the Tesla monstrosities outsource pollution to outside of the city, while trucks pollute our own living area. If coal power plants are in proximity to the residential areas, then my argument is nullified.

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I actually use my truck for what is built for. All these bright shiny cocacola cowboy carts look really nice but until they sweat theyre just toys for little boys.

this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
106 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

12585 readers
940 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS