176
20 years of Gmail (www.theverge.com)
submitted 1 year ago by boem@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 122 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Being a bit nostalgic, but Gmail was such a leap forward when it was released. In a world where everybody took the shittiness of hotmail for granted, using Gmail was like peeking into the future. In many ways it was.

Now Gmail is that shitty hotmail we took for granted.

[-] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

image

Feels somewhat familiar, doesn’t it.

That, and Chrome was cool when it came out, now it's just evil...

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] HereIAm@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I personally swapped over to Proton Mail recently. Exporting over all saved email, groups and labels from Gmail was easy. I love it so far, it's very similar to how Gmail works. I've set Gmail to forward everything to my new one so I don't need to go to back very often.

The only bugbear I have currently is while multi-selecting emails in the inbox, then open one up to read it and back out, the selections aren't remembered. But they are pushing improvements all the time, so I'm sure that will be fixed with time.

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Port87? (At least I hope, because I made it. :)

[-] repungnant_canary@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That looks... surprisingly promising

[-] repungnant_canary@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Many websites prevent providing aliased Gmail address, how you're planning to address that issue?

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I use a dash (hyphen) instead of a plus. It’s worked everywhere I’ve tried it. You can still use a plus if you want, but the address it shows for a label in the UI is with a dash.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cloudless@lemmy.cafe 80 points 1 year ago

20 years on, I still prefer folders instead of labels. And I still don't want messages group as "conversations."

It used to be free 1GB of mailbox storage that kept expanding for free. Now there is a hard limit unless you pay.

[-] vvv@programming.dev 16 points 1 year ago

Everything else wrong with Gmail and Google aside, those are the least reasonable complaints? You can use labels as folders. You can also disable conversation grouping, but I doubt you go more than a week before turning it back on.

[-] Lemming421@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, a label is just a more versatile folder. If you don’t like that, you can just use a single label per email, but I genuinely can’t see any value in that. But you can if you want.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cloudless@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 year ago

Do I need to write comments that represent what you feel?

[-] Chozo@fedia.io 16 points 1 year ago

It used to be free 1GB of mailbox storage that kept expanding for free. Now there is a hard limit unless you pay.

I don't think anybody expected that to last forever. That said, the free limit is still way more than enough for most people. I've got 20 years of emails in my account, and I'm just barely past my free limit.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

It used to be free 1GB of mailbox storage that kept expanding for free.

Within a week you could tell there was a set maximum, the speed of increase steadily fell the higher the storage value got. It was a good marketing ploy, but there was never a “forever expanding” promise made.

What if a message covers 2 different topics?

IMHO the entire OS should be based around files and labels, not files and folders.

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

On Linux file systems it basically is. A file name is just a label for an inode, and the same inode can have as many file names as you want.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 53 points 1 year ago

From the comments on the article:

There was this brief shining moment when we had Google Now and Google Inbox and, at least for me, they were incredibly useful tools. Then they transformed into a content chum box and a stale email platform respectively and, while I think I know why, I’ll never understand WHY.

I feel this so hard. Inbox was so great and being forced back into old-school Gmail was so disappointing. RIP Inbox.

[-] laurelraven 18 points 1 year ago

This.

I'll never forgive Google for killing Inbox. Of all the projects they killed, that one hurt the worst. I went from being able to actually manage my email to it turning right back into an unmanageable mess overnight, and in spite of their promises, not a single one of Inbox's features that enabled this were ever implemented in main Gmail.

That was a big turning point for me in being able to trust them for anything

[-] Resol@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I always wished for Inbox to simply become the new interface for Gmail. My wishes were destroyed once it got discontinued.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 7 points 1 year ago

There was a brief moment between Jelly Bean and Kit Kat in which Google Now and Inbox made being tracked by Google kind of useful in everyday life

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FaizalR@kbin.social 38 points 1 year ago

Anyone got an invite? 😅

[-] cestvrai@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago

I remember how excited I was when I finally got an invite code. Now happily gmail-free for 2 years.

Google Maps and YouTube I can’t avoid but otherwise ungoogling successfully.

[-] vladmech@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I’m mostly over on ProtonMail but I don’t know if I’ll ever be comfortable fully deleting my Gmail :/

[-] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago

btw you can use freetube or libretube for youtube, and use an openstreetmaps clientt to replace google maps

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wish osm+ was as good as maps. It's so close and I'll still use it for in town destinations.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] DoingFedTime@scribe.disroot.org 25 points 1 year ago

20 years of surveillance by Gmail...

[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

I remember when getting an invite was such a big deal.

[-] ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

$100/pop on eBay. At the time, Hotmail inboxes had a storage limit of 2 MB.

[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

11 years of ProtonMail let's goo

[-] DingoBilly@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Gmail is still good for me at least. Does everything I want, doesn't need new features and I don't see ads or anything.

What more would I get from someone else? I'm not going to pay for privacy at end of day.

[-] tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.net 14 points 1 year ago

Well if you're not going to pay for privacy, you won't get it either 😂

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

Same. Got no real reason to move away from it, and for all the shit people give it, you weren't there when it came out. We were drowning in spam about nob pills.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

It is way past time for the US government to offer their citizens email that is not owned by a private company and used as a tool to steal your private information.

This private-public partnership that controls all of our banking and communication is pure bullshit. It is basic services the government should provide. Instead we have private companies either charging us exorbitant fees or turning us into the commodity.

Meanwhile the government has complete control and can tell them to stop servicing us at any time and there is no redress. The government can literally tell your bank to stop doing business with you and you have no rights. Plus, being a private company, they can also stop servicing you because they happen to have a hair up their ass today.

There is no real choice anymore and the consumer always gets screwed. We really fell down the privatization well of retardation and it does not look like we are clawing our way back up anytime soon.

[-] Lemming421@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

If the government can get your current email or bank account shut down, why do you think they couldn’t/wouldn’t do that on a government-provided one?

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

You would have actual rights and redress with a government agency plus when someone hacks the government's data it would be a big deal and people would go to prison instead of a private company just shrugging their shoulders and saying oh well.

The government would not need to sell your data. The government would not be able to just change terms of service on a whim. The government would be mandated to provide the services without having to enshittify services later on to capitalize on profits.

The current system of the government calling the shots but not being held responsible should come to an end and these basic services should be provided as a right. To think that private companies can literally destroy your life by removing your ability to bank or communicate and not be held responsible is beyond ridiculous.

[-] Lemming421@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

While I don’t disagree with you in principle, I do find it a bit funny that you’ve picked one of the easiest services to change between as your hill.

There’s no reason you _ have_ to use Gmail, or Hotmail. There are a billion email providers and if you have enough technical knowledge, you can even run your own (I really don’t recommend this though, it’s harder then it seems to do it safely and securely).

If you pick a provider outside the US, your government can’t do dick about getting it shut down, and if you pick one in a particularly privacy-conscious country, you can have everything encrypted to the point where the provider themselves can’t read your messages.

Also, I assume this is similar in the States, but I’ve seen government IT projects in the UK and some of them are truly awful. I wouldn’t necessarily trust them to look after important emails for me. Plus a single source of email would be an awfully tempting target for hacker groups around the world.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There is a reason we don't just use any email. It takes time and energy to change providers and in the case of being locked out not even possible. I have no issue with private email, but I do have a problem with the government expecting to communicate with people and not providing that means of communication.

Until we recognize email and banking as a right we will continue to allow private companies and the government to fuck us over. Private companies are all spying on you do not believe their privacy bullshit for a second.

You may be better off doing business with a private company from a country who actually respects your privacy through codified laws, but that does not really solve the problem.

[-] Lemming421@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It’s like… I want to disagree with you, but you’re making me think.

Why are we ok with having required services that are only provided by third party companies?

They’re not specific - No government says you must have a Facebook or Twitter account. But you’re right - you have to have a bank account and you’ll not get far in 2024 without email.

What about a step further? If you want a phone number, you need a landline or mobile. Both of those are only provided by private companies too…

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Private vs public is not a new debate by any means. I think the tax preparation business in the US a great example. Decades ago the US government was deciding whether to develop a government web based front end to file US taxes. Predictably the existing big players objected to this and offered a deal.

The gist of the deal was they would let most tax players file for free. Why waste government money and resources when the private sector can do it cheaper. Sounds good right?

Well in the end it did not work out that way. Websites used dark patterns to get tax preparers to pay when they should not. They had many data breaches and you can assure yourself they mined the fuck out of any data you share with them.

I like the idea of a standard government phone. Secured by our best technology and locked up tight from data miners.

Perhaps passing stringent privacy laws and regulating the hell out of these technology companies could be enough to turn the tide and certainly they would prefer this to the prospect of the government taking away their monopolies.

I am firmly on the side of the government providing these services though because of the reality we are facing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] vojel@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago

Back in the days that was awesome. I had some kind of shitty Hotmail like German mail provider. 100MB storage, lots of ads. Google pushed into the right direction, almost unlimited storage, at first no ads. This was a huge step forward for email back then. Anyways I ditched Gmail and most of their services years ago, paying for mailbox.org for years, never looked back.

[-] simon574@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

From the article:

When you have enough storage that you never have to delete anything, you can keep an infinite record of your life. Packages, receipts, itineraries of past trips, messages from loved ones, photos, appointments, documents — you can just label them, archive them, and search for them later.

I don't want Google to have that information for free, to analyze/monetize/sell to 3rd parties. That's one of the reasons why I quit GMail. It was difficult too because I was registered to literally 100s of websites with that address.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
176 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

72471 readers
3170 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS