1402
PSA rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 year ago by RothyBuyak to c/196
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 147 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is an actual conversation I had with my oldest nephew when we went to the Boston Tea Party Museum last week.

"If you ever hear people complaining that damaging commercial property during a protest is unacceptable, remember what you learn about the Tea Party today. Our country was literally founded on protests trashing commercial property. And remember that some people complained to them that it was unacceptable too."

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The tea wasn't owned by the mom and pop shop neighbors who were also fighting for the same cause. There is a difference to me in a large corporation sustaining damage it will recoupe from insurance and people trying to scrape by and now can't afford rent until the hopefully if they had insurance, then maybe a check comes in a few months.

Those places if a protestor breaks in during a riot I am fine with being shot at and even killed if need be. Your cause doesn't give you the right to starve or put in jeopardy other people's lives who did not choose to riot.

[-] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago

Case in point

[-] Stoneykins@lemmy.one 17 points 1 year ago

Owners are owners. I can't have too much sympathy if a group of disenfranchised people, who have never had the opportunity to own anything, don't distinguish between hyper capitalists and regular vanilla capitalists. Both are pieces of the system that denies people the value of their labor.

[-] Ataraxia@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

That's exactly what the government wants. They want you to eat each other not them and the corporations. Stop buying shit, stop paying for internet and cell service, stop buying cars etc. That's the real control we have. Just be idle and watch them bail.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What a fucking asshole. Maybe your position will change when it's your property that's being destroyed.

Destroying private property does not make politicians or police question their choices. It barely hurts them in any way. You know who it hurts? Your friends and neighbors who had abso-fucking-lutely nothing to do with whatever it is you're upset about.

The Sons of Liberty only destroyed property that was directly responsible for their oppression.

You wanna go burn down the mayor's house? The police commissioner's house? The police union HQ? Have the fuck at it, you have my full support.

You wanna burn down the local convenience store or meat market? You wanna destroy vehicles and businesses that belong to your neighbors who are suffering alongside you? You're human garbage.

[-] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Second verse, same as the first:

"IIt was the Sons of Liberty who ransacked houses of British officials. Threats and intimidation were their weapons against tax collectors, causing many to flee town. Images of unpopular figures might be hanged and burned in effigy on the town's liberty tree.

Of course, the winners write the history books. Had the American Revolution failed, the Sons and Daughters of Liberty would no doubt be regarded as a band of thugs, or at the very least, outspoken troublemakers."

https://www.ushistory.org/us/10b.asp#:~:text=It%20was%20the%20Sons%20of,on%20the%20town's%20Liberty%20Tree.

I'll let Dr. King do the talking:

"A riot is the language of the unheard. And as long as America postpones justice, we stand in the position of having these recurrences of violence and riots over and over again. Social justice and progress are the absolute guarantors of riot prevention"

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/05/29/minneapolis-protest-martin-luther-king-quote-riot-george-floyd/5282486002/

"I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White citizens’ “Councilor” or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can’t agree with your methods of direst action” who paternistically feels that he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a “more convenient season.” Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection."

https://billofrightsinstitute.org/primary-sources/letter-from-birmingham-jail

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Chais@sh.itjust.works 92 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Jesse's absolutely right. The only reason our politicians are governing us is because we let them. Occasionally they need to be reminded of that fact.

[-] MostlyBirds@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The reason our government governs us today is because they have an overwhelming ability to do violence on us, and the majority of us fear it, even if only subconsciously. If you think it's by our choice, you're utterly delusional.

You're right. I never signed a contract with the USA agreeing the current system is the best. We have our ancestors to thank for that, and even then, most of them had no control over the situation.

What's the best way forward here? Constitutional renewal every generation?

[-] MostlyBirds@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Constitutional renewal every generation?

Yes, especially considering that was the original intent of the document. Whether or not that's the most realistic, or even a possible way forward at this point is another question entirely, and I don't like what I think the answer is.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rozauhtuno 69 points 1 year ago

Based take.

I swear, if you could teleport some people back to the French revolution, they'd be like "No need to protest, the king will give up absolute power on his own if we keep asking nicely" 🙄

[-] BloodForTheBloodGod@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago

The idea of a Right Wing literally exists because the deputies who thought that way in France back then took the right side of the chamber.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] parlaptie@feddit.de 59 points 1 year ago

Would be nice if we could start at not demonizing peaceful protests. Nowadays any protest is seen as a massive misguided problem of you so much as block a street.

[-] hungryphrog 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But then muh car can't move! Go defend your human rights somewhere where it doesn't inconvenience me!

spoiler/s

[-] abraxas@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In fairness, I've got too many emergency workers in my family not to draw the line at fully blocking thoroughfares. Can you look an EMT in the eye who has had a patient die while their ambulence couldn't get through protestors to the hospital and insist you're in the right? Happens more than you'd want to know. Can't find statistics, but googling it shows just page upon page of different incidents, and unfortunately most of the time shit like that happens it isn't published since it's all HIPAA-complicated to discuss that stuff.

You want to inconvenience someone walking into a Macdonalds? Go ahead. But keep the artery roads clear. It's not about convenience, it's about shutting down life-saving infrastructure. Those assholes that cemented themselves to 93N in Boston 5 years back didn't earn any sympathy from anyone, even their own cause.

To simplify, the only way to get me not to stand beside you in defending your human rights is if you're recklessly taking away someone else's.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

Dang kids should do their climate strike on the weekends!
Not much of a strike then, is it? You want workers to strike in their free time too? That will show 'em!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CannaVet@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

This. Even "liberals" are out here "PROTEST IS COOL AND ALL BUT DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY JUST MAKES EVERYONE HATE YOUR CAUSE" over a fucking sticker or sign stuck to something.

[-] Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Riots are generally an escalation of peaceful protests, sure there are exceptions.

Usually, riots break out when people get so frustrated at the fact that no progress gets made during protests that they start to lash out.

[-] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

I'm with Jesse on this one

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

We remember the reasonable ones positively, but it isn’t all of them. It’s important to remember that not all riots or protests are to create a more equitable society. Unite the right was a riot for example and one could easily call Mussolini’s march on rome a protest.

Even peaceful protesters like MLK said that "riots are the voice of the unheard"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BugleFingers@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

Speaking in terms of the USA, the constitution was built with the intended reasonable pursuit of escalating properly-to violence If need be. Peaceful protests, voting, freedom of speech, etc. are all avenues of reprimand towards an over reaching or overbearing government. Violence was seen as acceptable and even necessary in some cases but was never intended as a first resort.

This is why right to bear arms exists along with all the other approaches. Now it's a matter or decision by the people of what methods have been exhausted, which are futile, and what is next.

Revolting, fighting, and force in the name of freedom from a truly oppressive government is a necessary sacrifice for any people who wish to live with the freedoms that brings regardless of nationality, location, or beliefs.

Clarifications: This is not against any government for any disagreement, just truly oppressive ones that strip human rights from the people.

Violence should never be a first resort, but has it's place among negotiations.

Personal opinion: These means should not be used for ones own benefit, you are upset because of the ways of life for all the people, the rights of your people, there is a fair likelihood this method will result in a world you will never see or benefit significantly from, its for others; those that follow. How else would I be able to sit here and eat bugles if someone didn't strive for a world good enough for me to do so?

[-] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Based and LeftPilled

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] colin@lemmy.uninsane.org 32 points 1 year ago

my favorite is whenever i encounter the phrase "non-permitted protest". like, the idea that you should ask permission from the authority you're protesting before doing so: it's just so laughably missing the point

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NotAPenguin@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago

Yep.. People hate protests because they don't understand that's how it has always worked.

[-] MostlyBirds@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

People hate protests because they value not being inconvenienced more than they value the rights of others.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Nioxic@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Americans needs to fucking quit their jobs and go peotest. Your country is shit and sitting idly by and posting memes about it, wont solve anything

Look at france.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] cupcakezealot 24 points 1 year ago

We should just start calling riots championship football celebrations. Then the media and the pols would love them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rindel@lemmy.fmhy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

When I was growing up I had a lot of right-wing influences in my ear; I almost grew up to be an alt-right/fascist psycho. I've reformed now, and I'm the polar opposite of where I was when I was younger, but I hope I can offer a little insight into why protest is so demonized: it's because people don't think it actually works.

Protests, riots, and other public shows of solidarity are viewed in the same way as a petition: it's not going to actually get anything done, it's just raising awareness and trying to get people to agree with you. This is, of course, a fundamental misunderstanding of what protest (or even petitions) are really about... But when I was in that mindset, I didn't care to know more, and I didn't bother to read into. There's a great deal of cognitive dissonance regarding it, because historically-speaking, protests are typically lionized, i.e. the Boston Tea Party.

I'm not saying to sympathize either; being a fashy shithead is first and foremost a choice. I just hope this helps with understanding a bit more. ACAB, taxation is theft, keep fighting the good fight.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.one 20 points 1 year ago

As a Portlander, we had our fair share of riots... The problem is any lack of a coherent message.

Things would start off fine during the day with a Black Lives Matter protest, but as soon as the sun went down it became taken over by anarchist white kids who just wanted an excuse to break things and steal shit.

Not all protests are the same, and when you have people attacking an Historical Society for no good goddamn reason, that's where you lose support:

https://www.oregonlive.com/news/2021/04/portland-church-park-historical-society-damaged-in-downtown-riot-the-destruction-is-pretty-gnarly.html

Same for blocking streets and freeways. You want to piss off your intended audience? Keep them from going home.

https://www.wweek.com/news/2020/06/09/portland-protesters-briefly-seize-a-freeway-but-police-refrain-from-using-more-force/

To top things off... the things they were protesting had fuck all to do with Portland. What do you want Portland to do about ANY of this shit?

[-] CannaVet@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Cool story bro

Now try being this angry about cops when THEY break things and steal shit and yknow KILL PEOPLE.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zuberi@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Fucking preach. France was rioting for literally NOTHING. And we're losing hundreds of thousands to drugs/homlessness/no healthcare/etc.

Where the fuck are the organizers? I'm in Texas and I'm just about done w/ this shit.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 25 points 1 year ago

Nah, they weren't rioting for nothing - they were rioting because a line was crossed.

If they let the PM push things through in that way, the battlelines will just be around a more important issue, and they'll be in a much weaker position

[-] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Cops murdering a child isn't "literally nothing", it's a very good reason to riot. Just because it happens so often here that we're desensitized doesn't make it any less abhorrent.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

When localities pass ordinances to restrict more peaceful protests, they run the risk of pressurizing into even more violent and illegal protest situations.

I try to explain this to my dad. Protest means that people are unhappy and feel like their voices aren't being heard. People need to be motivated to do it. It's an effect, not a cause.

[-] Kalkaline@lemmy.one 16 points 1 year ago

Riots are a last resort because people end up dead or in jail if they fail. You want to keep people who are on your side free and alive while achieving your goals.

[-] vaeleery@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But it is not enough for me to stand before you tonight and condemn riots. It would be morally irresponsible for me to do that without, at the same time, condemning the contingent, intolerable conditions that exist in our society. These conditions are the things that cause individuals to feel that they have no other alternative than to engage in violent rebellions to get attention. And I must say tonight that a riot is the language of the unheard.

MLK Jr. - “The Other America,” 1968

Love this quote, everyone starts with the last sentence and sometimes include a few sentences after that but I think this section is the most generically useful bit. This applies everywhere for every struggle of the oppressed.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

The real question is, what changed? Why are we no longer ready to go up in arms against our governments for literally violating us?

[-] TheEntity@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

Because the power imbalance got too great.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] topRamen@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

As long as no one is damaging private property of people who have nothing to do with what is being rioted over.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Robaque@feddit.it 10 points 1 year ago

Seems like Heisenburg was a one trick pony. Jesse was the real visionary all along!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DannyMac@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
1402 points (100.0% liked)

196

16624 readers
2592 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS