719
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Marilyn Lands, a Democrat who made reproductive rights a central part of her campaign, will win a special election Tuesday for an Alabama state House seat, CNN projects.

Her victory serves as another data point for national Democrats, who hope the backlash over strict state abortion laws following the overturning of Roe v. Wade and concerns about in vitro fertilization treatments will help their party in November, even in traditionally Republican areas.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 86 points 9 months ago

This is one of the only reasons I'm still a little hopeful about 2024. Even if Trump wins, he very well could not control the legislature. And because of abortion.

[-] ares35@kbin.social 84 points 9 months ago

trump would veto everything passed by a democrat-controlled congress that didn't pass with near-unanimous support from republicants, too; abuse tf out of 'executive orders' (even more than the first go around); stack scotus even more; and further empower other nutjobs to follow in his diaper droppings.

trump moving back to 1600 penn ave nw would be a disaster from which this nation would not recover.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago

Sure, but he would also not be able to pass laws that he needed to pass in order to cement his dictatorship plans. Which is why I have a slight amount of optimism.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 31 points 9 months ago

The world's-most-evil-sun-dried-tangelo led an insurrection and is successfully running for president again with people carrying out conversations such as "why Trump's serious attempt at dictatorship might not be so bad." If he wins, I'd expect any dissenting Dems to be forced out either by pressures within or legitimate coordinated attacks from MAGA supporters.

Hell, there's a high probability powerful political adversaries will be straight up killed and they'd call it Operation Hummingbird to honor the true architect of the current Conservative playbook.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I don't disagree, but I am going to cling to any shred of hope I can cling to. I can't just accept that all is lost until all is actually lost.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 10 points 9 months ago

When the first assassination (“suicide”) comes, you should pack your bags.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

I have dual citizenship, possibly a third option although I would have to renounce the other two, so that's not an issue.

[-] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

This guy plans ahead haha

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] teejay@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Why would he even bother with all of the red tape and process to pass laws? He would just issue ~~imperial edicts~~ executive orders to do whatever he wanted. Laws have never meant shit to him. And why would they? He breaks them with impunity and never faces any real consequences. If he has an unfriendly congress, he'll ignore them.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] kromem@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

He's not aiming to depend on the legislature.

Going to replace career non-partisan positions across most departments.

Once you own the paper pushers, doing things by the book becomes much less relevant.

In theory there were rules in Germany that would have prevented Hitler up until the point he declared those rules no longer applied and his armed militia agreed with him.

[-] just_change_it@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

It's a truly bizarre single issue to focus on considering how high impact it is to the masses and how it presumably isn't enabling them to make more money or solidify control.

If they just brought in a couple of populist policies that made the masses happy they probably would have majority control indefinitely on a platform of hate against the minority.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 62 points 9 months ago

I hope everyone uses the following buzz-words when discussing this with conservatives, moderates, centrists, etc.:

  • "I mean I'm for individual freedom as much as the next guy, so that's why I don't think it's right to have government intrude on an individual's rights to their own body."

  • "I thought Republicans wanted small government? Why are they forcing government in the doctor's office with me and my doctor?"

  • "I thought Republicans were all about 'my house my rules,' — why are they so concerned about an unconscious parasite that is getting free rent from my body? That fetus is a squatter I can evict whenever I want!"

Identify the double-standard in conservative values.

[-] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 9 months ago

Legit people need to start doing this. I've been saying it for years.

'I'm a true American patriot, I'm not gonna let the government tell me or my fiancee what I can and can't do with my body. Stop being a commy' said to an anti abortion republican with an American flag. I also call them snowflakes.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago

It works with all the anti-LGBTQ stuff, too:

"I'm a rugged individualist, which is why I think people should be able to identify and call themselves whatever they want!"

"As a freedom lover, I see no difference between respecting someone preferring to be called Josh over Joshua, and someone preferring different pronouns. Doesn't 'ffect me none.... After all, it's just about showing respect to your good neighbor."

[-] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 9 months ago

Good neighbor reminded me, it also works for religion if you're talking to those types.

'the lord said love thy neighbor and something about throwing stones, fuck you for being a bigot'.

[-] Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social 7 points 9 months ago

The trick ive caught on to is to be nonconfrontational, nonthreatening, and try and get in good with them first. The conservatives i talk to these days are other exploited poors from my work. They like me, and i def play into being eccentric/nonconforming which resounds well with these individualism loving individuals. So then i just frame any of these sorts of issues you highlighted from that angle.

Its... not something theyre ever prepared for.

Another tip is to present as some sort of radical centrist, regardless of how much of a far left heathen u may in actuality be.

[-] bitchkat@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

I had very good luck actually convincing christians that supporting LBGT rights was a christian activity. But that was back in the early 2000's and they were a bit more reasonable back then and actually willing to think. Basically, I would get them to pull the God doesn't make mistakes card and that people are being tested. This is when I'd tell them that is likely true but they are the one being tested not the LGBT person.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

Ooh I love the “don’t be a commie” addition. We all know how desperately those snowflake conservatives want to be part of the in-group. That shit will make their heads hurt.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[-] pageflight@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

YouGov surveyed folks who changed their minds about abortion.

Quotes

[-] shasta@lemm.ee 9 points 9 months ago

Unfortunately, that's not very helpful for convincing people to change their minds. All of these read as "patting myself on the back because now I'm enlightened to the truth." And that's fine, and good, but unhelpful as a debate tool.

[-] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 months ago

Uteran immigrant.

[-] Dark_Arc@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Don't forget "I thought Republicans were the party of states rights? Why are they trying to ban abortion nationally after some states held elections to protect abortion in their state constitution?"

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Oh that's a good one, I'll take note.

At the end of the day the revolving door of inconsistent conservative values just exposes their real values: "what I want and what I believe and fuck everyone else"

The great thing about highlighting this stuff is it resonates heavily with swing-voters and fence sitters. It's what helped me move from right to left.

[-] Wooster@startrek.website 45 points 9 months ago

Damn… Alabama of all places. That’s about as Bible Belt as you get.

[-] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago

Rant

I want to say something as I'm frustrated with America and stupid text messages.

Please vote and try to avoid voting for GOP, it seems gop only want control and money for the rich. Whereas democrats are at least trying to help the average American.

This is my opinion thanks for letting me stand on my soap box.

End rant.

[-] TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

How do text messages relate?

[-] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

They don't i was just irritated. I get text messages from gop candidates and don't know why.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 months ago

Just reply with dick pics, worked for me.

[-] Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social 4 points 9 months ago

Nah, theyre already into dick cheney and gay porn so they might like that.

[-] TomAwsm@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Joke's on you, they're into that shit.

[-] TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Honestly, I wouldn’t do what the other commenter suggested, but I would send back images in response. Most telephony services charge them to receive messages and receiving MMS comes at a slightly higher rate.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 29 points 9 months ago

You would think that conservatives would realize that this is a boulder that they can't keep trying to roll uphill forever, but I suppose they're not exactly known for their forward thinking.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

This is what happens when the dog finally captures the car.

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 months ago

The hero we need.

[-] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Does this person support electoral reform?

Switching away from first past the post voting makes third parties viable and eliminates the spoiler effect. Just search for videos on FPTP voting if you want an explanation on how and why first past the post voting makes third parties not viable.

Electoral reform is possible in each individual state (for now), we dont need federal reform! Maine and Alaska have already passed electoral reform actually.

So what's the hold up with the rest of the states? Start a campaign in your own state! Force our representatives to compete with fresh outside ideas. We deserve the best representation, not excuses.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 14 points 9 months ago

I understand what you're going for, but right now people are focusing on the fact that this person supports human rights.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
719 points (100.0% liked)

News

23634 readers
2717 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS