Splitting the rent. : memes

[-] linuxduck@nerdly.dev 98 points 1 year ago

If a partner moved in with me they absolutely would help pay my mortgage. But I wouldn't lie that I didn't own the place. Just set standards of what I expect

[-] MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago

Let's be serious, the bank owns the place until it's all paid off.

[-] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

That's what I'm doing with my SO. My house and my mortage but she pays about half of it though that includes also groceries, water and electricity

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] ophelia@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 year ago

What the hell is up with some of these "memes"? This isn't funny

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago

Someone is dumping their entire Facebook meme backlog. Whole lotta boomer posting

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

[removed by mod]

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because when they break up she has nothing and he has her money in the form of equity. Splitting consumption bills is obviously good, but splitting a mortgage where one party gets it all is far less cut and dry.

If that's all up front and she agrees then whatever but the scenario in the meme is pretty scummy

Replies filled with people that will hopefully never live with their girlfriends because they seem very satisfied with the idea of lording over a romantic partner.

[-] FuckFashMods@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago

She got a place to live.

load more comments (5 replies)

[-] dmmeyournudes@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Motherfucker that's called rent.

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah but charging a partner rent is kinda shitty. It's supposed to be an equitable partnership that benefits both parties. Otherwise why have a partner?

[-] dmmeyournudes@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

It’s supposed to be an equitable partnership that benefits both parties. Otherwise why have a partner?

if 2 people live in a place, 2 people should pay the rent. that is equality. you're advocating for the woman to not pay the rent because she's a woman in the meme.

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

We're talking mortgage. If we're talking rent then yeah she should absolutely pay. It just gets muddier when equity is involved and there should be some agreement up front.

[-] dmmeyournudes@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Equity? You do realize loads of rental properties are under a mortgage right?

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I'm not dating the landlord

[-] dmmeyournudes@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Yes, yes you are.

load more comments (6 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

He paid 700k for an apartment, so naturally she can live in for free, because he doesn't pay rent. Very smart

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago

Not to say that the deception is shitty, but she'd be in the same situation as if she rented a place. It's a little out there to expect equity when all you did was cohabitate for a period, it's the exact same thing as renting a room or something.

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

The difference is a rental agreement and generally people in relationships aren't expected to be in a landlord tenant situation. If this was just your friend then sure

[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well hang on, here's a scenario for you: Say I own a 2 bedroom condo, and have a roommate that I charge rent. One day, I meet a girl and we start dating. At some point, said roommate moves out, and it just happens that my gf and I are at the point where she moves in, and said 2nd room gets turned into a office or guest room, because obviously we're going to share the master. She pays me rent for living with me (might even be a lower amount for whatever reason). After two years, we decide to break it off since it isn't working between us and she moves out. Do you think I should be expected to pay her out a slice of equity? How is that any different than a roommate renting a room from a financial standpoint?

And in response to your other reply, what if she didn't contribute to repairs? I think my point here is where do we draw the line? I can understand if a partner makes a significant investment contribution to the property, but I don't know if I necessarily agree even with a certain length of time outside of marriage without a prenup, considering if y'all were renting somewhere you would have no claim to the property whatsoever. Just because someone is in a relationship with someone, in my mind, does not entitle them to another person's assets just because they were together.

load more comments (10 replies)

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Because when they break up she has nothing and he has her money in the form of equity. Splitting consumption bills is obviously good, but splitting a mortgage where one party gets it all is far less cut and dry.

The person renting (man or woman, if the situation was reversed on gender) has no responsibility for maintenance or liability to the house. If the renter is paying rent, they should also have no responsibility to pay for any house maintenance. Roof needs replacing? Homeowner pays, renter pays nothing. Fridge goes out? Homeowner pays, renter pays nothing. Mail carrier slips on ice and sues? Homeowner need to defend themselves, renter pays nothing. If the renter wants to break up and move to Alaska, renter can do exactly that with 30 days or less notice. Homeowner would need to go through all the trouble of evicting and selling the property to do the same.

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

She's not renting though as there's no rental agreement. She's just throwing money into the equity. This is a relationship, not a landlord tenant arrangement.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It doesn't matter if there isn't a written lease. Its still very much a rental arrangement. No law enforcement will hold her liable for being a homeowner. No law will compel her to pay for a new roof for his house, should it need it. In fact, if she's been there more than 30 days she'll likely have many legal protections a renter has, such as protection from being thrown out without formal eviction.

[-] irmoz@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

It doesn’t matter if there isn’t a written lease. Its still very much a rental arrangement.

That's sorta the issue. You shouldn't treat your SO as a tenant.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I would hope you treat your SO as an equal partner, but that also means healthy boundaries equal to where the relationship is at the time. If one doesn't pay rent, but pays toward the mortgage, and you break up instead of getting married, do you expect the home owner partner to cut the other partner a check to cash them out of their "equity"? How is that fair to the homeowner?

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (7 replies)

[-] knobbysideup@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My gf pays half the mortgage. She lives here. She uses everything. She helps with bills. This is a lot less expensive than if she were paying rent elsewhere.

She also didn't contribute to: new fridge, new kitchen floor (damage from old fridge), new bathroom ceiling (mold damage), new driveway, new garage, tree removal and trimming, new door (that broke when she failed to latch it in high wind), and all other house stuff.

asking half the mortgage when the burden of all the rest is on you is not asking a lot.

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Sounds more like a landlord tenant relationship then. Maybe if it's a girl you met six months ago then sure, but if your girlfriend helps with your mortgage for a few years and ends up with zero equity then you scumbagged her.

[-] ch00f@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We specifically split the interest portion of my mortgage. It changes every payment obviously, so we just rounded it and adjusted it every year or so.

5 years later we’re getting married, so it’s all moot.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean, if they're not married and he charged her rent, how's that much different than having a roommate? Why would she be entitled to ownership of the property just because she paid for a place to live, barring marriage or common law? There's something to be said about being up front about your financial situation sure, but how she could expect equity out of the arrangement is a little asinine, unless she helped pay for repairs and upkeep (aside from basic cleaning/chores).

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

It's obviously all a made up scenario, but imo time is a significant factor here. If she lives there for three years then it's likely that she's helped with repairs etc, so imo should be entitled to equity in some respect.

Seems a bit shit to treat a partner like a roommate.

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

This is supposed to be a meme?

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

What’s the expectation here? That you get to live for free because you’re banging a guy who owns a house? Alrighty.

[-] LopensLeftArm@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

Absolute madlad

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] gedhrel@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

In the UK, she has some claim to shared equity.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

[removed by mod]

[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

How did she find out? I would've kept it going

[-] BCsven@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Evryone missing the possibility that he owned it outright (no mortgage)

[-] dis_honestfamiliar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Who the hell calls it flat. Confusing.

[-] Ragerist@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

British people do..

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

Memes

Rules: