798
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 57 points 6 months ago

All religions are shit, some are more shit than others. Just depends on the degree to which they impede human progress by imposing arbitrary rules on their followers, offering a haven for abusers within their leadership structures and interfering with politics in general (but particularly where education policy is concerned). Negative value across the board.

[-] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

100% agree.

Hijacking the top comment to suggest everyone read the book The Dark Side of Christian History by Ellerbe. It's really good. It's super short but does a great job highlighting how at every point in the Church's history, whenever they had to make a decision, they always followed whichever direction led to more political and social power for the church at the expense of spiritual enlightenment, justice, truth (obviously), or human lives.

I read 1984 at the end of last year and man it's crazy how much Orwell basically described life under the Church during the Dark/Middle Ages at the height of it's political power.

[-] Enkrod@feddit.de 50 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Christianity is not inherently better than Islam, it just behaves better nowadays.

And the reason it behaves better is not something inherent to christianity, but because it got dragged, kicking and screaming, into the age of enlightenment and beaten up with education, democratisation and secularisation until it had to bend or break and it's adherents decided to bent.

Islam is still more radical because it faced less opposition to it's ideas from within. The islamic world needs it's own age of enlightenment where radical tensions between religion and an educated public reduce the influence of religion on that public.

And I don't think this has much to do with Islam being younger. Islamic natural philosophers are behind some of the most important discoveries in the sciences and the Islamic Golden Age ended around 200 years, before the Renaissance even started.

If the Islamic Golden Age had not declined, today Christianity might have been the more radical religion and we might have seen a mostly secularized islamic world. It is mostly through chance that history unfolded differently. And with Project 2025 in the US, we might still see a return to barbarism and departure from secular enlightenment in the most powerfull nation puppeteered by christian extremists.

[-] FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works 18 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It doesn't behave better. It's coerced into being less harmful than it used to be, due to its irrelevance in the daily lives of millions of people coming from places with a Christian history, and more secular legal frameworks, which, you're right, where fought for tooth and nail.

Give Christianity a finger, and it'll take the whole arm. It's still as dangerous as it's ever been, but it's more contained than it used to be. Cf Poland, France, the Southern US, Russia on issues like abortion, feminism, LGBT rights, and even geopolitical stuff like the support of Israel thought to be a step towards the apocalypse.

The Southern US Y'all Qaeda types are proof that Christianity is just as backwards as Islam is, when given the opportunity.

Edit: I'm not opposed to you, I'm just adding more thougts to yours. Sorry if this sounded adverserial.

[-] Enkrod@feddit.de 8 points 6 months ago

It doesn't behave better. It's coerced into being less harmful than it used to be, due to its irrelevance in the daily lives of millions of people coming from places with a Christian history, and more secular legal frameworks

Oh absolutely, that's how i meant it. 100% agree.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 6 months ago

Not the OP, but you're not coming across as adversarial. Those of us who aren't wedded to an identity over common sense can disagree without feeling attacked. However, I don't disagree with you. Everything both of you said is true, with your comment making both more true, if that makes sense.

I took my partner to a catholic church to check out the ceremony (she's from a non-christian country). We'd toured it before because it's very grand and impressive from an architectural standpoint. I try to view it through her eyes, as though for the first time (I didn't grow up catholic, but I'd been to many varied-christian masses). What a bizarre ceremony. Any people consider it completely normal. This reflection has nothing to do with the original topic. It's just something that crossed my mind as I typed this out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 44 points 6 months ago

I left the church so i could do shit like this tho

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago

Hey, how you doing?

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 40 points 6 months ago
[-] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 months ago

What atrocities have mainstream Buddhists participated in? I know there have been Buddhist terror groups but it really doesn't seem like the norm. Aggressive and greedy people use religion as a tool, some religions are more likely to engage in violence than others though.

[-] theluckyone@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

I doubt you'll get a response. You've made your position clear in your statement: any actrocities referenced will be declared an act by a terror group outside the norm.

[-] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 months ago

What do you mean, how is that even a position? There have been crusades lead by Christians numerous times though, Islamic conquest, Jewish Zionist terror groups, a lot of history to be referred to, when within Buddhism it is much rarer. One historical tale is of Ashoka, a powerful emperor in the Indian subcontinent who supposedly after converting to Buddhism spent most of his efforts spreading teachings about kindness and non-violence. Buddhist principles of harmony and non-violence helped unite Japan, bringing about relative peace after centuries of conflict.

[-] summerof69@lemm.ee 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Buddhists in Tibet have been involved in perpetrating atrocities, both against each other and individuals of other religions. The historical context reveals instances of violence and oppression within Tibet, including the feudal serfdom system that subjected serfs to harsh conditions and exploitation by their owners, who were often monks and aristocrats.

Moreover, the involvement of Buddhists in violence is not limited to Tibet but extends to other regions as well. For example, during the Cold War era in Southeast Asia, Thai Buddhists were complicit in anti-communist mass killings under a nationalist ideology that aligned with Buddhism's principles. This involvement in political violence highlights how Buddhism has been weaponized by political authorities to consolidate power. The history of Buddhist violence underscores the complex relationship between religion and politics, showcasing how religious beliefs can be manipulated to justify or incite acts of aggression. Some notable examples include the mass killing of Ajivikas in India, the violence in Myanmar against Muslim Rohingyas.

I guess what you were trying to say was that Buddhism wasn't as powerful as Christianity to reach the scale of Crusades.

[-] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 months ago

You are correct that what I said could just reflect the fact that Buddhism hasn't reached the same level of political consolidation as Christianity. But there have been Buddhist empires throughout history.

You do point out another aspect that I was reflecting on though, that these religions are used as tools by nationalists or other political authorities. In my view it is not the religion itself that enables or supports these atrocities but the centralized power that these organizations are able to hold. Human societies have had religion for all of known history so it is difficult to thoroughly prove that these societies would be more or less violent without religion of any type. If they didn't have a religious group driving the masses to be pawns of their violence, it could be a trade group like the Dutch East India Company.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 months ago

i mean, to some degree, any act of terror can be deemed outside the norm specified. I think realistically. As long as a group has a tangential terror rating lower than the average human populous that's probably a good thing.

[-] Rud_1UP@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago
[-] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 months ago

Buddhism has extremely good PR, but ultimately it is just that: PR. You can find messages of peace, compassion, and violence in plenty of religions to higher or lesser degrees, but as soon as they become large enough to be politically relevant, one leader or another will resort to violence sooner or later, and will take advantage of their followers' faith to justify it.

As for Buddhism specifically, this is a good start: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism_and_violence#Regional_examples

[-] donescobar@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

“I know there have been Buddhist terror groups but…” the joke writes itself 😂

[-] Irving@lemy.lol 4 points 6 months ago

In ancient China, Buddhist organizations also had a history of annexing land, oppressing people, and competing with secular governments.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago

Religion has always been a tool for conservatives to wield power over normal people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago

“Many religions now come before us with ingratiating smirks and outspread hands, like an unctuous merchant in a bazaar. They offer consolation and solidarity and uplift, competing as they do in a marketplace. But we have a right to remember how barbarically they behaved when they were strong and were making an offer that people could not refuse.” - Christopher Hitchens

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 20 points 6 months ago

If you don't think radical atheism isn't like radical Christianity and radical Islam, you haven't studied the history of the various communist countries of the world.

People who are absolutely certain they are right can do some fucked up shit.

[-] SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Do you mean anti-theism? If you're talking about people that actively oppose religion. Atheism is simply a lack of belief in theism.

I'm also not sure how communism relates either, unless you're talking about secular societies that were communist and committed atrocities, such as Soviet Russia under Stalin. In Soviet Russia the state belief was atheism, but again, in their pursuit to eliminate religion I would argue that is really anti-theism.

[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

I can agree with everything you said here, but read most of the posts and comments in atheist communities and tell me most of them aren't at least somewhat anti-theist.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 15 points 6 months ago

Whatever belief or non belief anyone has isn't the problem .... it's when those individuals want to impose this beliefs or non beliefs onto other people whether those other people want it or not.

I really don't care what other people think, that's their life. The problems start when people start thinking that they have a right to force their ideas or thoughts onto other people.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Ha! Look at this dude and his radical atheism!

Imagine an actual violent war broke out between Star Wars fans and Star Trek fans. They are bombing each other's conventions, and shooting each other in the streets. From the outside, you're just like, why are they acting like this? None of it is even real! Why can't you just let each other enjoy science fiction? Why do they have to like YOURS better?

Atheists, like all people, do have things to go to war about. Money, power, real things that are important to them, and it may be greed or love that pushes an atheist to war, but science fiction had nothing to do with it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I'd be surprised if you had a single though about this whatsoever... Not only do you somehow link atheism, a philosophical outlook on the impossibility of godhood as described by religion, with Communism, a socio-economic model, you attribute the actions taken by dictatorial semi-socialist leaders to both.

I don't think a regular human could say something this stupid if they tried.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] uis@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago

I didn't know France was communist country before even Marx wrote Capital.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

If you think Radical Islam is alone I'd like to introduce you to Ireland and India. Both countries proving that radicalism transcends race and culture.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

Radical Buddhist monks in Myanmar fomented a genocide. I always point that out when someone says Buddhism is the one good religion or whatever.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Indians are committing Genocide on Muslims. Somethig something blame Islam.

[-] Leviathan@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

All religions are or have the potential to be completely shit. End all religions.

[-] bleistift2@feddit.de 9 points 6 months ago

Who ever thought that? To me the muslims are the better people by a big margin. It takes a lot more 9/11s to even the score.

[-] Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
[-] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago
[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

TiedUpAndWet

[-] Crass_Spektakel@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

There is one difference:

The Spanish Inquisition killed less people in 300 years than Islamism every single day.

Guess you didn't expect the Spanish Inquistion?

[-] Rud_1UP@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Are you forgetting the genocide commited by the ultra orthodox Spanish in South America? Have you ever been to Buenos Aires? Super long flight only to end up in the whitest European city ever. Oh and also, what about the total killings until today just by US made mines and shrapnel in Southeast Asia? Doesn't even come close to whatever number you had in mind for "Islamism".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] KlugeMaster@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Religion is not the enemy, church is the enemy. Church wants to be accepted as the only path to salvation. The enemy is church, or whatever name it is called.

[-] Neon@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

No they are not.

Christianity has a Pope which can adjust Christianity to modern Times.

Islam has an outdated Book from an outdated Time that will always be the same and has to be accepted as the absolute Truth forever.

One can adjust, the other cannot. They are not the same.

[-] Agrivar@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

Christianity has a Pope which can adjust Christianity to modern Times.

  1. Catholicism has a Pope.

  2. The current Pope is just barely progressive and he gets endless pushback from the cardinals, bishops, and even laypeople.

  3. All the other flavors of Christian have other opinions.

  4. Islam is in a very similar situation.

  5. Both suck ass and should go away.

[-] Spawn7586@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

I mean, the post clearly states "was". So even without commenting on the accuracy of your post I can clearly see you missed the point

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
798 points (100.0% liked)

Atheist Memes

5464 readers
214 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!religiouscringe@midwest.social

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS