29

I'm sure there are many very valid reasons why this change is problematic for the unfortunate people involved, but to my eyes it does look a bit... odd that they're complaining they've been unfairly treated for (checks notes) being given the same as Men born in the 50's.

But hey, I'm just a 36 year old with no realistic expectations of ever being able to claim a state pension, let alone retire. What do I know.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Streetlights@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They have stated that they agree the pension age should rise and be in line with men. The complaint is it was done too suddenly without sufficient notice and therefore didn't give women enough time to effectively plan for it.

Imagine being 59 looking forward to retirement, maybe you've already dropped your hours and have enough savings to make it to 60 and then expecting your pension to kick in when suddenly the rug is pulled out from under you and you need to work 6 more years. I can sympathise with them, even though I'll probably never get a pension.

[-] JoBo@feddit.uk 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Why would you post an article you have not read?

For years, the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman has been investigating how the retirement age rise was communicated by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) to women most likely to be impacted by the change.

In 2021, its initial finding of maladministration by the DWP centred on a delay in providing direct information to this group of women.

While some women were aware of the general policy change, they did not know it would affect them personally. The ombudsman said that letters should have been sent directly to these women more than two years earlier than they were. For some, the delay was much longer.

And, just in case you're feeling all hard done by, pension rights were only equalised in 2005 (because civil partnerships meant the inequality affected men as well as women). It was not retrospectively applied and my mother has retired by then. So her pension scheme will pay the widows of the men in her pension scheme but her widower will get nothing. And the same applies to most of the pension contributions made by women before 2005; top-sliced to subsidise the men in the same pension schemes. Quit your whining.

[-] Oneeightnine@feddit.uk 6 points 6 months ago

Why would you post an article you have not read?

Mainly because of a lack of time but a deep interest in drumming up a little activity in the community if I'm honest.

My opinion may well be wrong and Ill thought-out, but I'll stand by posting articles from the beeb if I think they've got some relevance to the overall community, which I think this one does.

Thanks for the cordial conversation friend. I'll quit my whining now.

[-] JoBo@feddit.uk 2 points 6 months ago

The article from the Beeb is fine. It's just that it answers the question you asked.

Thanks for the content tho.

[-] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 2 points 6 months ago

(checks notes)

You apparently, didn’t even make notes, let alone check them

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 6 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The original plan was to phase those changes in between 2010 and 2020, but the coalition government accelerated the shift in 2011 in a bid to reduce the cost of the state pension system to the taxpayer.

The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman report comes after years of campaigning and legal challenges over how the retirement age for women was brought into line with men.

The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman investigation was set up to look at how the retirement age rise was communicated by the Department of Work and Pensions to women most likely to be impacted by the change.

On Thursday, the body is expected to publish the second and third parts of its investigation, which deal with whether those communication failings amounted to "injustice" and possible recommendations on compensation.

According to Ms Madden, the government saved £181bn by equalising the state pension age between men and women - a principle she did not disagree with.

If you are reading this page and can't see the form you will need to visit the mobile version of the BBC website to submit your question or comment or you can email us at HaveYourSay@bbc.co.uk.


The original article contains 895 words, the summary contains 195 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
29 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4041 readers
35 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS