584
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 197 points 8 months ago

“I do not believe you can be born gay, and I do not believe homosexuality is right, though the law of this land has made it legal doesn’t mean it’s right,” Omooba wrote in the post. “I do believe that everyone sins and falls into temptation but it’s by the asking of forgiveness, repentance and the grace of God that we overcome and live how God ordained us to, which is that a man should leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife and they shall become one flesh.”

Hmm, being homophobic and trying to have a career in theater. Thats a bold move, lets see how it pays off.

After hearing testimony in 2021 that Omooba had previously told her agents that she refused to play gay roles and had not bothered to read the script for the musical version of The Color Purple before accepting the role, an employment tribunal dismissed the actor’s religious discrimination claim, The Telegraph reported.

How can you not even read the script, the book its based on, or even at the least watch the Hollywood movie for a part you're trying to land in an acting performance?

“I have long forgiven all those who have sought to ruin my theatre career,” Omooba said in a statement following the ruling, “but the theatre world needs to be told, loud and clear, that canceling people for their Christian beliefs is illegal and wrong.”

Doesn't look like it turned out well for her.

[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 80 points 8 months ago

As someone of color, I wonder if she would agree with the KKK discriminating against her, as they also consider themselves "Christians" spreading hate against people over things they do not control.

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 41 points 8 months ago

Yeap, a lot of slavery in America was perpetuated and validated by religious beliefs. Plantation owners believed that black people were cursed by the mark of ham, and thus were entitled by an act of God to enslave people.

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Also, the Bible literally says: "but I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence" 1 Timothy 2:12

So according to Christian dogma, SHE wouldn't be allowed to speak up against men, even if they are breaking some other rules, or try to teach the theatre world anything.

But it's a fair bet saying she's never opened a bible in her life, seeing she can't be bothered to even check out what the story is about when applying for roles.

Edit I realised this might read quite neutral, so I'm adding a fuck monotheism here just to make my view on the matter clear

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Yeap, a lot of slavery in America was perpetuated and validated by religious beliefs

Goes even beyond that. Christianity - specifically, the New Testament verses that extolled the virtue of earthly toil on behalf of a secular lord in exchange for heavenly reward - was leveraged to convince the slaves themselves that their lot in life was justified. And for a great long period of time, it was successful. Even after the Confederacy's back was broken, mobilizing a population that had been wiped into submission for centuries was legitimately difficult. The Freedman's Bureau had a herculean effort put at its feet - to engage, re-educate, and empower millions of newly emancipated black men and women after a lifetime of debasement and degradation.

When you get into why Reconstruction failed, a big part of it was like looking at a spouse in an abusive relationship trying to get out from under a hyper-domineering partner and scaling that sociological problem up to the scale of whole cities and states.

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 11 points 8 months ago

When you get into why Reconstruction failed, a big part of it was like looking at a spouse in an abusive relationship trying to get out from under a hyper-domineering partner and scaling that sociological problem up to the scale of whole cities and states.

I mean that, but also Andrew Johnson was a horrible person and even a worse president

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 29 points 8 months ago

It's simple. They're the wrong kind of Christian, and she's the right kind.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

They're not real Christians.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

No True Christian would fail to hate the exact same groups of people I hate.

[-] Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world 54 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Not just theater but musical theater the absolute stronghold of the LGBTQIA+... Yeah let's just talk openly about how I believe the vast majority of my coworkers and peers (who probably have backgrounds of religious trauma) are morally defunct and how their ability to feel loved and supported shouldn't be considered protected by society!

I want to grab her by the shoulders and say : For fuck sake honey. No one in your field wanting to touch you with a 9 ft pole isn't their fault. Having someone openly homophobic in a role where getting the gold star of casting has been for the past several years meant actually choosing someone who has actual experience in a similar identity to what they are potraying... It would be suicide for a production. People are going to look to a queer character to project themselves in those situations. Knowing you're just a bigot doing it for self agrandizement, accolades and cash is going to cause fucking boycotts from the very target audience of the show!

Spilling your theocratic dirty laundry on twatter because you can't hold it in can be a "career limiting move" and that's just normal in a pluralistic society.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago

Concrete proof that these people simply don't live in reality.

She thinks this is oppression.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 39 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That’s what I have trouble understanding - not even reading the script. Apparently she counted on her agents to “filter” things for her. Sounds highly unprofessional.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Definitely failed at basic adulting: "read carefully before signing".

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 38 points 8 months ago

Hmm, being homophobic and trying to have a career in theater. Thats a bold move, lets see how it pays off.

I laughed so loudly as this comment, my kids came to check in on me.

[-] Kindness@lemmy.ml 9 points 8 months ago

I've gotten too used to people intentionally misspelling a certain person's name. 'Omooba' threw me for a loop.

“I have long forgiven all those who have sought to ruin my theatre career,”

It would be beneficial for her to realise long and deep self-reflection is a virtue.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Thats a bold move, lets see how it pays off.

The Daily Caller is always hiring.

How can you not even read the script, the book its based on, or even at the least watch the Hollywood movie for a part you’re trying to land in an acting performance?

More curious how she got hired on those terms. It seems like a simple line reading might have clued everyone involved in on what this story was about.

[-] SteefLem@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

So you cant cancel people for their christian believe. But apparently you can cancel people for well everything else? Woman is mad.

[-] TurtleJoe@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

TBF, the supreme Court has mostly agreed with her in multiple cases.

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 93 points 8 months ago

You really shouldn't be starring in The Color Purple if you don't understand that discrimination is bad.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 64 points 8 months ago

Discrimination against ME is bad.

Discrimination against YOU GODLESS HEATHENS is good aktuly.

Besides, something something mumble mumble black liberation had its roots in religious movements something something mumble mumble don't ask what white slavery had its roots in though.

[-] Tangentism@lemmy.ml 20 points 8 months ago

She is absolutely clueless and didn't even read the script before taking the part.

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 62 points 8 months ago

People really need to learn that "freedom of expression" is not the same as free from consequences. Otherwise, defamation wouldn't be a crime, for instance.

[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

This case has nothing to do with freedom of speech. She was suing a private theater on the grounds of religious discrimination which is a law, not a right. She was denied because she wasn't discriminated against based on her religion, but rather was fired because her specific expression impacted her job. She would have been fired no matter what religion she was a part of which is why it wasn't religious discrimination

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

People need to stop being told they have free speech. They do not.

[-] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

We seemingly don't, and that is bad thing. People should be allowed to say whatever they like, or democracy doesn't work. What does it matter if you can vote for whoever you want, if you can't even vocalise an opinion that the majority disagree with? I disagree fundamentally with this woman's opinion, but that doesn't mean she should be banned from saying it - if we disagree with it, we should disincentivise others from believing it by arguing against it, not hiding the opinion.

[-] turmacar@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

She wasn't banned from saying it, she was fired for refusing to do the job she was hired to do.

If you hire a butcher and they refuse to work on / around / in the vicinity of pork because of their religious beliefs, you are not firing them because of their religion. You're firing them because they're not a fit for the job they were hired for.

Demanding the script change because she has a problem with LGBT+ and being let go isn't being "cancelled", it's demanding the entire production bend to your personal beliefs and being told "no".

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Holyginz@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

But you are missing the point here. She wasn't told she couldn't comment or make those statements. She made those statements when her role was a gay character for a musical that she never read the script for, any of the literature or looked at any other productions of. She also had stated that she didn't want any gay roles. She would have completely ruined the production as well as caused a massive backlash against the theater when her views were discovered by the target audience. This isn't a freedom of speech situation, she wanted to say whatever she wanted without consequences and that doesn't exist unless you are extremely wealthy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 50 points 8 months ago

Another Christian religious nut. Get fucked.

[-] misspacific 44 points 8 months ago

on this episode of "My Sincerely Held Belief Takes Precedence Over Everything" we once again attempt to claim that any consequences for my anti-social behavior is a direct attack on myself and my religion.

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 9 points 8 months ago

But my religion says I have to hate people and tell them they're going to Hell.

"All those who have sought to end my career." So entitled.

She refused to play a gay role, but when she was found out she'd signed up for a gay role, she didn't quit, just go all persecuted when she was fired from the gay role that she refused?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UnaSolaEstrellaLibre@lemmy.world 32 points 8 months ago

Being homophobic in THEATER, of all places?!?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 3volver@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago

They will probably believe they're being discriminated against while being the one who is discriminating against others. Typical flawed world view.

[-] Tangentism@lemmy.ml 21 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Her comment at the end of the article confirms that she's in deep with the persecution fetish

“but the theatre world needs to be told, loud and clear, that canceling people for their Christian beliefs is illegal and wrong.”

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Odd, I don't remember christ demanding the ability to say hateful things to people. But I bailed on the religion over a decade ago, so who knows what new things they've found that Jesus said now.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago

lol this bitch didn't just get fired from a job for saying homophobic shit...SHE TOOK A ROLE PLAYING A GAY CHARACTER!

She didn't read the script. Found out later she played a gay character. Why didn't she just quit?

[-] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

Hey she still has the right. Just no job lol.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 20 points 8 months ago

"Defending her right to make anti-LGBTQ+ comments" is a strange way to frame this by a pro-LGBTQ source. No one here is saying she doesn't have a right to say these things, they're saying she doesn't have a right to stay employed at this job after saying these things and refusing to work with her employer to manage public perception

[-] blazera@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

she's not defending her rights, she's challenging the rights of studios to choose who they work with.

[-] yarr@feddit.nl 16 points 8 months ago

She always had the right to express her ideas... she just didn't have the right to be free from the consequences of doing so. I also enjoy the tension of "I follow everything the Bible says" / "I'm not homophobic"

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 9 points 8 months ago

Before appealing, she should take into account whether she can afford to pay more legal costs if (when) she loses again.

[-] Cagi@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 months ago

A society doesn't have freedom if I can't insist others can't have freedom! /s

[-] kowcop@aussie.zone 6 points 8 months ago

How often does it happen that the people who make such an effort to outwardly project something, is also hiding it.. calling it, she is gay

[-] Elmerfuddz@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

How to ruin one’s public image in 10 seconds.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
584 points (100.0% liked)

Atheism

4059 readers
54 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS