82
submitted 1 year ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Radicalized@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago

Did they really allow it?

Someone made a username with a slur in it. Two hours later they were banned and the redundancy patched. A little after that an apology was announced.

[-] fearout@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Yeah, this reads like such a nothingburger I don’t see why it’s news. Yeah, they didn’t add enough filters, but fixed it as soon as it was pointed out. Why continue the outrage?

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Why continue the outrage?

To satisfy and monetize the clickbaited.

[-] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago

In a vaccum it wouldn't be such a big issue, but it's already a pattern at this point.

[-] CassiniWarden@infosec.pub 24 points 1 year ago

Ooh "under fire" what's next, they're going to get "slammed"? That'll show em.

[-] heluecht@pirati.ca 6 points 1 year ago

@BrikoX Thing is: By now they are having a fixed list of not allowed user names. They now updated that list.

this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
82 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32212 readers
606 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS