363
submitted 6 months ago by Beaver@lemmy.ca to c/fediverselore@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] starman@programming.dev 38 points 6 months ago
[-] Beaver@lemmy.ca 70 points 6 months ago
[-] FundMECFSResearch 63 points 6 months ago

His argumentation is dumb.

But even more so, IF the bourgeoisie were promoting pro-trans stuff. It would NOT be suprising that the bourgeoisie would ALSO be promoting anti-trans stuff. It fans the flame of this “culture war”which according to communist theory, would distract people from realising the “true divide” in society is class, and workers to unite.

TLDR: He’s clearly a conservative of some sort because his logic is incompatible with communist theory.

[-] xnx@slrpnk.net 48 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Puts transphobes in quotation marks, bans everything he considers “sinophobia” even if you just mention literal policy in china. why are tankies so weird about so much stuff

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 26 points 6 months ago

Authoritarianism is a mental disorder. You can never expect reasonable thought from them

[-] Beaver@lemmy.ca 16 points 6 months ago

They do not understand the concept of gaining grassroots' support through the use of education.

[-] xnx@slrpnk.net 15 points 6 months ago

Don’t equate authoritarianism with mental disorders or disabilities. Authoritarians love targeting the disabled and it has nothing to do with it. People being miseducated, propagandized, and their insecurities leading them to want authoritarians in control has nothing to do with mental disorders

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 14 points 6 months ago

I really mean it though. Authoritarianism is a trauma response to being abused as a child. Our brains when raised in an authoritarian household that punishes us through physical violence like spanking becomes much more likely to seek authority from positions of power in adulthood, and if there becomes a power vaccuum or a shift away from top down authority, we transform ourselves from the follower to the leader. Whether or not authoritarians victimize people with mental disorders and disabilities is immaterial. They victimize every single group they can marginalize because they were ultimately empty from the childhood trauma that they've glossed over and turned into a positive aspect of their upbringing. Anytime you hear "my parents spanked me, and I turned out find" you are hearing a twisted mind grappling with an extreme trauma and justifying the shitty person they've become because if they don't, it means they haven't survived their core trauma yet

[-] GatanKult@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

freudianism is pseudoscience, as is most discourse around "child traumas" (spanking = trauma? really? that's absurd concept creep). Just look at the recovered memory movement.

While it often took weeks or months, by all accounts, the therapists were remarkably successful at convincing patients that their minds had hidden horrible abuse memories.

because childhood memories remain in the liminal period of awareness, you can convince yourself that personality is built on childhood experiences. It's an insane tabula rasa and simply not true.

wants strong government = beaten as a child is a terrible pop-sci take, exactly the same as chuds saying all gay men were molested as children

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 months ago

(spanking = trauma? really? that’s absurd concept creep).

Please stop. Anything can be traumatic. Two people can have the same experience; one receives trauma and another does not. You likely know people who have trauma from parental violence. This isn't rhetorical, the things you say affect people.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 8 points 6 months ago
  1. Yes. Fruedianism is psuedoscience. That's why I'd never deal in it.
  2. Saying childhood traumas don't shape us is fucking embarrassing when you're trying to present yourself as being in the know
  3. Saying spanking isn't traumatic makes me think I don't even have to deal with the rest of what you say
  4. Yes. Recovered memory is a bunch of bunked up bullshit. Again. I'd never deal in it. You really are focused on tearing down what I'm saying based on shit I never said
  5. Yo, you think fucking cihldhood memories end when you start having more awareness? We're talking about the entire lived experience of being a child in an adults household. That shit ends when you leave for college. Again. You're really focused on saying I'm saying something I'm not saying, so actually, genuinely, fuck off.
  6. Saying this is a pop-sci take is probably the only real thing you said in all this. And there's a difference between "wants a strong government" and "wants a dictator" and that's what I was addressing. I'll drop some links and let people coming across this decide which of us is basing what they're saying off current understandings of how brains work
[-] Ambii@lemmy.ml 23 points 6 months ago

Is this your own conversation with him?

[-] Beaver@lemmy.ca 30 points 6 months ago

Yeah, I spoke with them.

[-] Goodie@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

Lost me at 'Why do they need to be "rooted out"?'.

Welp, they're a piece of shit.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yeah kind of buried the lede, you don't need to unpack political ideologies to understand the hatred in the first response.

[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 months ago

This context just makes you both look silly.

[-] Beaver@lemmy.ca 33 points 6 months ago

That is a false equivalence as I did not state hate speech

[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

This is even sillier

[-] Azzu@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago

I'm not sure how this is hate speech from nutomic? They're not necessarily saying anything bad about trans people as far as I can see, only that the bourgeoisie have nothing to do with it? Or what am I missing here

[-] Beaver@lemmy.ca 15 points 6 months ago

Looks at the terms they used.

[-] Azzu@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Ok sorry I'm not seeing it, which terms? Genuinely asking

[-] Beaver@lemmy.ca 15 points 6 months ago

“Biological men” is a transphobic term to describe trans women

[-] Azzu@lemm.ee 9 points 6 months ago

It is? Shit I thought it was just a longer form of "amab". Language changes so quickly...

[-] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 months ago

I'm not saying nutomic isn't a raging tankie and transphobe (they definitely are as per the post) but I don't see how saying biological male is the transphobic part?

There is much more obvious transphobia to point out here such as the claim that "the trans agenda" is being pushed by "the bourgeoisie". Last time I checked trans people experience intense discrimination which makes it very hard for them to be part of "the bourgeoisie", and a majority of media pushing against trans people is 110% owned by "the bourgeoisie"

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

Their reply prior to the borgeoise rant was downright odd, you're right about that.

this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
363 points (100.0% liked)

FediLore + Fedidrama

2483 readers
8 users here now

Rules

  1. Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
  2. When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.

Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)

Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.

Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc

(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama

Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse

Partners:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS