893
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
  • Trump and his supporters are slamming Joe Biden for quitting the race and endorsing Kamala Harris. 
  • Some members of MAGA world are bemoaning the millions of dollars spent running against Joe Biden.
  • Biden's withdrawal also means Trump is now the oldest candidate in the presidential race.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] raef@lemmy.world 215 points 2 years ago

Maybe they should have spent time and money promoting their candidate instead of attacking the other

[-] Hubi@feddit.org 138 points 2 years ago

This is really what it boils down to. But with Trump there is nothing to promote. The only way they can win is by ruining the reputation of their opponent to try to make them look worse.

[-] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

But it doesn't matter if he had nothing to promote. He's not above lying. This was just a bad decision on their part. Even if biden hadn't dropped out, there's no guarantee that a man that age will be here in four months.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

He's not above lying.

Lying is one of the things he has a lot of practice doing.

He's not very good at it, though, he contradicts his lies with other lies on a regular basis.

[-] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago

In the same sentence even.

[-] Maruki_Hurakami@lemm.ee 39 points 2 years ago

I said the exact same thing this morning to a coworker. They have no policies, just hate.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Project 2025 tends to disagree

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

True. Their policies are so bad they have to disavow them…

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Except to the right audience they are extremely proud of them. Yes overall their policies are unpopular but they aren't without support

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Sure - but they don’t need to win those folks votes

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

What's the point here? I'm trying to point out the very real danger they represent. Are you really going to downplay that danger? This is how we lost roe v wade

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Whoa…I agree with you. And I’m not sure why what I said upset you. I am just speaking in the context of the discussion of the post which is campaign strategy.

We need to shout about Project 2025 from the rooftops because it’s so toxic the Trump campaign wants it to stay hidden.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I find it counterproductive to say Republicans have no policy because they do, and it's ugly

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I thought that was an excellent point and was glad you pointed it out

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Alright good. And it's good to see a misunderstanding not go ugly online, as it too often does.

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I’ve seen and had way more go this way on Lemmy than on Reddit.

Just a better culture around here.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Well thank you for holding up your end. I admittedly lose my cool with people sometimes. It's hard to read tone, but I will say that you did a good job of avoiding condescension, which is probably the biggest problem in online discourse that I see.

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

To be honest I had to edit the tone of my comment a couple times before submitting it 😉

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

That's ok -- at least you did it. I need to do more of that

[-] raef@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It's that they don't need to be won over. They are going to vote for Trump regardless.

[-] Maruki_Hurakami@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

That seems like a hatred manifesto more than policy.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Call it what you want. The document is very clearly full of harmful policy goals.

[-] raef@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah, it's not a difficult concept

[-] Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

I was thinking this when everyone was saying it's too late to change candidates. While that might have been true if a campaign consisted of promoting people's positives, that's not what it is. It's all about finding the dirt on the other and switching candidates late just means there has been less shit talked.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

That and attacking the ideas, not the person.

[-] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 1 points 2 years ago

Policies don’t sell in the current political climate. It has been all about Trump vs not Trump since 2016.

[-] raef@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Oh, I understand, but if was still their strategy choice.

this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
893 points (100.0% liked)

News

36201 readers
2272 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS