1006
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ToastedPlanet 105 points 2 years ago

I didn't want to believe it but they're already in the comments. We need to be vocal. Kamala is a great candidate.

[-] baronvonj@lemmy.world 147 points 2 years ago

'Beating the Republican Fascist agenda' is a great candidate. I don't really care how that is spelled on the ballot.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 112 points 2 years ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 40 points 2 years ago

I'll vote for virtually anyone the Democrats nominate to stop the genocidal dictator, but my first choice, of course, will always be-

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago

Alright, fuck it. I'LL run. I'm 40, nobody knows me so they don't hate me, I think Hitler was bad, and I'll let you guys smoke weed and keep your pronouns.

And for the republicans in the room, I'm not going to send anyone to take your guns. That sounds like a bad idea, that we already saw play out in Waco TX. Nobody wants that.

And for all the cats registered as undecided parties......meow meow meow meow meow. Meow meow MEOW MEOW MEOW!!!! HISSS HISSSSS HISSSSSS clickclickclickclickclickclick......purrrr purrrr purrrr purrrrr purrrrrr.

And to all the mentally crazy voters, HEYMYNAMESBOBANDIMHERETOMAKEEVERYBODYSAFEFROMTHELIZARDPEOPLEFROMEATINGOURBRAINSANDTHEGOVERNMENTPOTBELLIEDPIGSBACONVIVALEREVOLUTION!!!!!

And to the dyslexic voters, Helol hwo aer yuo?

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Shit, quick someone get him on the ballots!

[-] queue 16 points 2 years ago

That's my main deciding point, and why I'm happy Biden stepped down. I didn't think he'd win the Rust Belt. Harris might.

My main vote is "Not Trump's Fascism."

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I will absolutely vote whoever is opposite of trump on the ticket. But a black woman winning the rust belt? That would be wild. I'm all for it, mind you, but that would be some crazy shit.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Trump kept climbing the polls in PA, which is the Keystone state of this election.

I'm not sorry, and I will be here all night.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago

Of course they are. They started when it was just rumored that Biden would drop out.

[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

How is she a good candidate? She stood against everything progressives stand for as a prosecutor and hasn't apologized or clarified that she supports marijuana legalization, abolition of for-profit prisons, or disproportionately prosecuting minorities.

[-] elbucho@lemmy.world 107 points 2 years ago

What the fuck are you talking about? When she was running for president in 2019, she released detailed plans about how she would legalize marijuana, abolish private prisons, and reform the carceral system.

I get that you probably weren't aware of her evolved stance on these things, but a single google search could have shown you that you were incorrect on every single point you made.

[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 70 points 2 years ago

And I'm happy to be wrong about her evolved state. Thanks.

[-] barkingspiders@infosec.pub 31 points 2 years ago

This is the bravest comment I've seen today, you deserve an internet prize 🏆

[-] wanderingmagus@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago

If I could give you some kind of prize I would. Have a meaningless pixel trophy instead, and an upvote: 🏆

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

I love this site

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

What the fuck are you talking about? When she was running for president in 2019, she released detailed plans about how she would legalize marijuana, abolish private prisons, and reform the carceral system.

Has she done those things? (I sincerely don't know.)

I've heard that she's revised her stances, but even in 2019 there was some question regarding the sincerity of her evolving viewpoints.

We're likely to get 8 years of her if she wins, so I think it's entirely reasonable to want her to affirm her stances in some of these areas. We won't be able to move any further left than she allows. Sure, she's not Trump, and I'm going to vote for her. It would be nice to have hope she'll do more than just move right more slowly than Trump though.

She says very little, and nothing convincing, about some of the most serious charges against her, like that she fought hard to keep innocents in prison and failed to fight hard against corrupt cops.

If elected president, Harris seems as likely as any of her Democratic rivals, and far more likely than Donald Trump, to pursue a criminal-justice-reform agenda that overlaps with policies I favor as a civil libertarian. And I do not hold it against Harris that as a municipal and state official she enforced many laws that I regard as unjust. All the candidates now running for president will, if elected, preside over the enforcement of some laws that they and I regard as unjust.

But like her rivals, the reforms that Harris would sign into law as president would depend mostly on what Democrats in Congress could get to her desk. Far more important is how she would preside over a federal legal system and bureaucracy that is prone to frequent abuses. And her record casts significant doubts about whether she can be trusted to oversee federal law enforcement, the military, intelligence agencies, the detention of foreign prisoners, and more.

[-] elbucho@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

I mean, she'll have ample opportunity to expound on that. But prison reform and legalizing marijuana were platforms she ran on in 2019. I haven't seen anything from her that would indicate she's reversed her position since then.

[-] ToastedPlanet 48 points 2 years ago

https://www.politifact.com/article/2019/aug/01/were-tulsi-gabbards-attacks-kamala-harris-record-c/

Harris "put over 1,500 people in jail for marijuana violations and then laughed about it when she was asked if she ever smoked marijuana."

Notably, the figures dropped dramatically during Harris’ tenure, from 817 marijuana-related admissions in her first year in office to 137 in her last.

She laughed because it was funny and I'm tired of people telling me it's not. 💥 🔫

She's been a prosecutor, senator, and now VP. She has the experience. She can speak in complete sentences. She is a neo-liberal but that was a given. All Democratic candidates since Clinton have been neo-liberals. The idea that Kamala is anti-progressive is false.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

Are you new to the democratic party?

[-] samokosik@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Let me ask you a question: Harris Or Trump?

[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Harris, 100% I was wrong about the statement. She evolved her stance and has grown.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

If she she's was a great candidate she would have been the candidate 4 years ago.

[-] ToastedPlanet 54 points 2 years ago

She was on the ticket 4 years ago. She is VP. Now she's on top. Kamala 2024!

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I'm concerned you couldn't grasp that by candidate we were talking about the Presidential candidate.

[-] ToastedPlanet 6 points 2 years ago

I understand. Kamala is going to president of the United States of America. And it's going to be awesome.

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago

So she hasn't gained any knowledge or experience in the last 4 years? We're all just born with all the knowledge and experience we will ever have?

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Honestly, doubt it.

[-] bolexforsoup 28 points 2 years ago

Fuck ooooffffffffff my god these flippant bullshit one liners get so old

[-] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago

If you’d applied this logic to trump would have even posted this?

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Wha... what? What does that even mean?

[-] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

The republicans are running last election’s loser.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago
[-] ImADifferentBird 8 points 2 years ago

By the same token, Biden was tied for dead last in the 2008 primary. Things change.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

That's an interesting factoid, but I haven't been able to find it anywhere. Do you have a source on that?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

She's an adequate candidate for the task at hand, which is beating Trump. Biden no longer is.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

That's far from a assured. She has a ton of issues on her own.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

She's an improvement over Biden. And just look at all the time, money, and effort Republicans wasted against someone who's no longer even running. They're flailing and trying to find something that will stick.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Improvement cognitively, I don't know if I'd say she's and Improvement in any other way whatsoever.

this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
1006 points (100.0% liked)

News

36000 readers
1967 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS