1006
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ToastedPlanet 105 points 3 months ago

I didn't want to believe it but they're already in the comments. We need to be vocal. Kamala is a great candidate.

[-] baronvonj@lemmy.world 147 points 3 months ago

'Beating the Republican Fascist agenda' is a great candidate. I don't really care how that is spelled on the ballot.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 112 points 3 months ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago

I'll vote for virtually anyone the Democrats nominate to stop the genocidal dictator, but my first choice, of course, will always be-

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago

Alright, fuck it. I'LL run. I'm 40, nobody knows me so they don't hate me, I think Hitler was bad, and I'll let you guys smoke weed and keep your pronouns.

And for the republicans in the room, I'm not going to send anyone to take your guns. That sounds like a bad idea, that we already saw play out in Waco TX. Nobody wants that.

And for all the cats registered as undecided parties......meow meow meow meow meow. Meow meow MEOW MEOW MEOW!!!! HISSS HISSSSS HISSSSSS clickclickclickclickclickclick......purrrr purrrr purrrr purrrrr purrrrrr.

And to all the mentally crazy voters, HEYMYNAMESBOBANDIMHERETOMAKEEVERYBODYSAFEFROMTHELIZARDPEOPLEFROMEATINGOURBRAINSANDTHEGOVERNMENTPOTBELLIEDPIGSBACONVIVALEREVOLUTION!!!!!

And to the dyslexic voters, Helol hwo aer yuo?

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Shit, quick someone get him on the ballots!

[-] queue 16 points 3 months ago

That's my main deciding point, and why I'm happy Biden stepped down. I didn't think he'd win the Rust Belt. Harris might.

My main vote is "Not Trump's Fascism."

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I will absolutely vote whoever is opposite of trump on the ticket. But a black woman winning the rust belt? That would be wild. I'm all for it, mind you, but that would be some crazy shit.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Trump kept climbing the polls in PA, which is the Keystone state of this election.

I'm not sorry, and I will be here all night.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 52 points 3 months ago

Of course they are. They started when it was just rumored that Biden would drop out.

[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

How is she a good candidate? She stood against everything progressives stand for as a prosecutor and hasn't apologized or clarified that she supports marijuana legalization, abolition of for-profit prisons, or disproportionately prosecuting minorities.

[-] elbucho@lemmy.world 107 points 3 months ago

What the fuck are you talking about? When she was running for president in 2019, she released detailed plans about how she would legalize marijuana, abolish private prisons, and reform the carceral system.

I get that you probably weren't aware of her evolved stance on these things, but a single google search could have shown you that you were incorrect on every single point you made.

[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 69 points 3 months ago

And I'm happy to be wrong about her evolved state. Thanks.

[-] barkingspiders@infosec.pub 31 points 3 months ago

This is the bravest comment I've seen today, you deserve an internet prize 🏆

[-] wanderingmagus@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

If I could give you some kind of prize I would. Have a meaningless pixel trophy instead, and an upvote: 🏆

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

I love this site

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

What the fuck are you talking about? When she was running for president in 2019, she released detailed plans about how she would legalize marijuana, abolish private prisons, and reform the carceral system.

Has she done those things? (I sincerely don't know.)

I've heard that she's revised her stances, but even in 2019 there was some question regarding the sincerity of her evolving viewpoints.

We're likely to get 8 years of her if she wins, so I think it's entirely reasonable to want her to affirm her stances in some of these areas. We won't be able to move any further left than she allows. Sure, she's not Trump, and I'm going to vote for her. It would be nice to have hope she'll do more than just move right more slowly than Trump though.

She says very little, and nothing convincing, about some of the most serious charges against her, like that she fought hard to keep innocents in prison and failed to fight hard against corrupt cops.

If elected president, Harris seems as likely as any of her Democratic rivals, and far more likely than Donald Trump, to pursue a criminal-justice-reform agenda that overlaps with policies I favor as a civil libertarian. And I do not hold it against Harris that as a municipal and state official she enforced many laws that I regard as unjust. All the candidates now running for president will, if elected, preside over the enforcement of some laws that they and I regard as unjust.

But like her rivals, the reforms that Harris would sign into law as president would depend mostly on what Democrats in Congress could get to her desk. Far more important is how she would preside over a federal legal system and bureaucracy that is prone to frequent abuses. And her record casts significant doubts about whether she can be trusted to oversee federal law enforcement, the military, intelligence agencies, the detention of foreign prisoners, and more.

[-] elbucho@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

I mean, she'll have ample opportunity to expound on that. But prison reform and legalizing marijuana were platforms she ran on in 2019. I haven't seen anything from her that would indicate she's reversed her position since then.

[-] ToastedPlanet 48 points 3 months ago

https://www.politifact.com/article/2019/aug/01/were-tulsi-gabbards-attacks-kamala-harris-record-c/

Harris "put over 1,500 people in jail for marijuana violations and then laughed about it when she was asked if she ever smoked marijuana."

Notably, the figures dropped dramatically during Harris’ tenure, from 817 marijuana-related admissions in her first year in office to 137 in her last.

She laughed because it was funny and I'm tired of people telling me it's not. 💥 🔫

She's been a prosecutor, senator, and now VP. She has the experience. She can speak in complete sentences. She is a neo-liberal but that was a given. All Democratic candidates since Clinton have been neo-liberals. The idea that Kamala is anti-progressive is false.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

Are you new to the democratic party?

[-] samokosik@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Let me ask you a question: Harris Or Trump?

[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Harris, 100% I was wrong about the statement. She evolved her stance and has grown.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

If she she's was a great candidate she would have been the candidate 4 years ago.

[-] ToastedPlanet 54 points 3 months ago

She was on the ticket 4 years ago. She is VP. Now she's on top. Kamala 2024!

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I'm concerned you couldn't grasp that by candidate we were talking about the Presidential candidate.

[-] ToastedPlanet 6 points 3 months ago

I understand. Kamala is going to president of the United States of America. And it's going to be awesome.

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago

So she hasn't gained any knowledge or experience in the last 4 years? We're all just born with all the knowledge and experience we will ever have?

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Honestly, doubt it.

[-] bolexforsoup 28 points 3 months ago

Fuck ooooffffffffff my god these flippant bullshit one liners get so old

[-] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago

If you’d applied this logic to trump would have even posted this?

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Wha... what? What does that even mean?

[-] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

The republicans are running last election’s loser.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago
[-] ImADifferentBird 8 points 3 months ago

By the same token, Biden was tied for dead last in the 2008 primary. Things change.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

That's an interesting factoid, but I haven't been able to find it anywhere. Do you have a source on that?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

She's an adequate candidate for the task at hand, which is beating Trump. Biden no longer is.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

That's far from a assured. She has a ton of issues on her own.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

She's an improvement over Biden. And just look at all the time, money, and effort Republicans wasted against someone who's no longer even running. They're flailing and trying to find something that will stick.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Improvement cognitively, I don't know if I'd say she's and Improvement in any other way whatsoever.

this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
1006 points (100.0% liked)

News

23305 readers
3319 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS