1003
Still Got It (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Glytch@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

We thought we had time and could do other things like health care for sick kids.

And "we" couldn't even do that. Just gave enormous subsidies to private insurance instead. Did nothing to control the price of medical care so that nowadays we have people dying because the price of insulin exploded (just one example). All because Democrats had to compromise with conservatives even with what should have been a fillibuster-proof majority.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Huge populations of people who couldn’t see doctors before, now could. And it was moving mountains to get that. Yeah, it was Romneycare, that’s what we could get at the end of the day. Want H4A? Me too. Let’s vote in overwhelming majorities then ride them until they deliver.

That’s why, when our precious progressiver-than-yous bitch about everything not being a literal paradise and therefore they can’t help progress I want to utter unspeakable unholy curses. It takes a lot of work. And it’s twice as hard when both the so-called-left and the right are against it.

[-] Glytch@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Democrats had an overwhelming when they passed obamacare.it was conservative Democrats who refused to vote for single payer. If Democrats had fallen in line and voted with their party it would have passed without any Republican votes needed, but the Blue Dogs said "no".

Of course it's difficult. It's especially difficult when the party that claims to be progressive refuses to pass progressive policies when they have the opportunity to.

[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

50%+1 is all that's required to overturn the filibuster. Pelosi chose to let the blue-dog democrats block single-payer because they were getting shittons of money from the insurance companies.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Name the "Blue Dogs" who said no.

(Also, please define Blue Dogs)

[-] Glytch@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Let me Google that for you

Look particularly at the section "Role in the passage of the ACA".

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah, you’re right. republiQans killed it but “Blue Dogs” failed us.

As has been the case many times. To be fair, that’s a 30-year old ‘coalition’ and being active in choosing the candidates isn’t prevented by any means.

this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
1003 points (100.0% liked)

Progressive Politics

1035 readers
320 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS