233
Nuclear too slow to replace coal, and baseload “simply can’t compete” with wind and solar, AEMO boss says (reneweconomy.com.au)
submitted 3 months ago by phneutral@feddit.org to c/energy@slrpnk.net
67 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The head of the Australian energy market operator AEMO, Daniel Westerman, has rejected nuclear power as a way to replace Australia's ageing coal-fired power stations, arguing that it is too slow and too expensive. In addition, baseload power sources are not competitive in a grid dominated by wind and solar energy anyway.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago

You don't need sunlight to grow crops, you just need energy; which in this scenario would require an energy source that is not the sun.

[-] kaffiene@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Yeah, that's hardly going to be a global solution. But whatevs this discussion is devolving into the rediculous

this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
233 points (100.0% liked)

Green Energy

2193 readers
103 users here now

everything about energy production

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
SteveKLord@slrpnk.net
poVoq@slrpnk.net