302
Pets rule (i.ibb.co)
submitted 2 years ago by LinkOpensChest_wav to c/196
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Aquila@sh.itjust.works 50 points 2 years ago

This makes owning a pet sound inhumane

[-] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 52 points 2 years ago

If you ignore them all day, definitely. Pet ownership is a contract.

My dog gets to come along with me on most of my adventures, and I work from home. He spends the vast majority of his time with his humans doing stuff.

When I'm home and he's chilling in the backyard, he has his friends (dogs and humans) who visit him through our back alley, he has a rich social life.

I think he lives a fulfilling life.

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav 6 points 2 years ago

I feel like my two dogs have fulfilling lives as well. My husband and I work different shifts, so they're not without a human for long, and when they are they have each other. They get a lot of outings.

[-] spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There are certain pets where I imagine it is. I've been holding off getting a bird because I'm grappling with the idea that most pet-type birds are wildly social creatures, and locking them up alone for 8+ hours a day isn't fair. And having an entire flock of budgies may not be realistic

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 2 years ago

the way a lot of people treat their pets definitely is, the only valid way to own a pet is to treat it as part of your family. The best pet owners are the ones who refer to them as their child, they unquestioningly take good care of them.

[-] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 1 points 2 years ago

That's definitely us with our cat, even though we are all he has in this world, I don't think he'd wish for more if he could.

Apart from us to come outside in the backyard with him. When we're outside he's happy

[-] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 15 points 2 years ago

It's capitalism keeping us from having home lives that is the inhumane part.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago

What are the odds in the year 3000, pet ownership will be seen as a blemish on history? “In yee olden thymes, they had nazis… meat eaters… pet owners… $your_chosen_political_party-s…”

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 2 years ago

we've had pets for at least like 10'000 years now, i don't think it's going to become unacceptable any time soon.

What i do think is likely is for there to be laws regulating pet ownership, just like how we remove children from the care of irresponsible parents. I think i recall sweden introducing some laws on needing to register the ownership of pet cats and dogs, or something along those lines.

this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
302 points (100.0% liked)

196

19153 readers
451 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS