546
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by TokenBoomer@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

The shooter was 12 when Trump was first elected. archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BlackLaZoR@kbin.run 7 points 3 months ago

registered Republican voter

WTF does that even mean? Voting during elections is anonymous, isn't it?

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 34 points 3 months ago

When you register to vote you can register yourself as a member of a political party which allows you to vote in their primaries.

[-] BlackLaZoR@kbin.run 9 points 3 months ago

Then it should not be "registered republican voter" - it should be "Republican party member"

Somone tries whitewash the party in that article

[-] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 27 points 3 months ago

Those are actually two entirely separate things. Membership in a local political party in the US is unrelated to whether you vote for that party. Party members are more active in organizing and generally have to be approved by other party members, whereas anyone can register as a party voter (in states that require/allow that).

[-] BlackLaZoR@kbin.run 4 points 3 months ago

Thats horribly confusing. What's the point of non members being able to vote? Sounds like this is just another type of membership which isn't officially called a membership

[-] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago

Oh, it gets even worse. Some states require party identification when registering to vote, some are optional, and others don’t ask about it at all. Relatedly, the party primaries can be “open” (anyone can vote in it) or “closed” (only party-identified voters can participate). Also, the party may choose to do a caucus instead of a primary, so instead of just casting a ballot to choose a nominee, registered party voters select party members who have declared for a nominee and then they hold votes to see if a nominee has enough votes to win.

And that’s the simplified version. It’s a total clusterfuck and if there was a national standard that was easily understandable, things would be so much better.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah, afaik in the civilised non-privatised world that is one and the same (and can't formally be two things).

If you want to vote a party leader (which person has nothing directly to do with public elections, he or she my not even run for any public position), you register with them (they don't have access to any central government citizens database after all, so they need to know who you are). But a party leader (and such) is just admin & strategy role, maybe branding.

If someone from the party (leader or not) runs for parlament or whatever, he or she can be affiliated with aparty (or not, even if a member), but in actual elections party-member votes are exactly as valuable as non-party (or any-party) members.
Which seems only democratic.
It helps towards the problem of "10 people deciding who the runners you can viably choose from are".

Also you don't register to vote, but that's seems like a separate yet related issue.

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

"Registered republican/democrat" is a very common phrase. I don't think that expression does anything to whitewash anyone, it's just a normal thing to hear.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

It’s public record. Why? I don’t know.

[-] Kolrami@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

In many states the party you're registered with is public. Who you voted for is kept private. The fact that you voted can't be kept private in any real way if you're voting in person.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah and in mine for instance most people don’t realize they’re registering. The party registration process is selecting which primary to vote in.

[-] workerONE@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Edit this was answered

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
546 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19136 readers
3869 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS