640
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Thomas Matthew Crooks, the suspectin Saturday’s shooting, was registered as a Republican voter, according to Pennsylvania records.

Already the republicans are dismissing his voter registration as meaningless. Here comes the “mental illness” angle.

Edit: apparently it’s not uncommon to register with the party you oppose in PA. This is going to be a fun ride.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 62 points 4 months ago

Republican voter and somehow this will be blamed on everyone else.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 25 points 4 months ago

"Missed to the left, therefore a leftie"

~ Maga probably

[-] Cistello@reddthat.com 4 points 4 months ago

Used to vote for Republicans and then donated for Democrats

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 37 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

He was 20. He could have voted only in a single election. Someone said he donated to democrats 3 years ago. This math is confusing the fuck out of me.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 15 points 4 months ago

Unfortunately I think what we're going to learn is that he's one of those people that register Republican to vote in their primaries to choose the weakest candidate giving Democrats a better chance.

Either way I unfortunately think this is going to give Trump yet another boost... God knows that's what we needed...

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 13 points 4 months ago

That's possible. Because we damn sure aren't going to learn that people are more complicated than a simple black & white label.

If this comes across as argumentative, I don't mean it that way. It's just pure cynicism.

[-] Gerudo@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

I read a snippit that in PA, it's not uncommon to register for the other party. More than likely, he really was a dem/non repub.

[-] dragontamer@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

He's pro-gun and we can point out the dangers of that alone.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 13 points 4 months ago

A person with his name donated $15 on the day Biden was inaugurated, when he was 17.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Fox News: "Biden campaign received illegal campaign donation from shooter."

[-] dragontamer@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

20 year olds don't have wealth to reasonably donate to an election.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 5 points 4 months ago

17 year olds, supposedly. (I can't verify the three years ago, so grain of salt.)

This doesn't really make sense and we might just have to wait for actual details from the investigation.

[-] dragontamer@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Some people are saying $10, which is a lot more to a kid than to an adult. But kids can afford $10.

EDIT: $15 to more reliable sources. Still in the rough ballpark tho

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 17 points 4 months ago

Apprently that was a differnet person in Philly that shares his first and last name.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The donation? Source on that? Not doubting you

Edit: I am now doubting you. Found the FEC filing and it lists a Bethel Park, PA zip code.

Edit 2: I was asked for my source: https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/fe91e6ba36695009/ac182c3a-full.pdf

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago
[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

NYTimes, so there’s a paywall. It links to the FEC (wouldn’t load on mobile for me but the FEC page did fully load on my desktop).

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/14/us/politics/trump-gunman-thomas-crooks.html

Edit: actually, the article has been updated since I read it. It no longer links to the FEC, just a NYT screenshot:

https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/fe91e6ba36695009/ac182c3a-full.pdf

Though it says Pitt, the zip is a Bethel Park zip

voter-registration record showed Mr. Crooks’s Republican registration, though federal campaign-finance records show he donated $15 to the Progressive Turnout Project, a liberal voter turnout group, through the Democratic donation platform ActBlue in January 2021.

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

The street address is registered to his father.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

He lives there too. Without doxing anyone or putting their info on here, you can read in the news that they all live together (dad, mom, son. Sister moved out a couple years ago)

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Yes, I know.

So in the house you had the mother, the father Matthew, and the son Thomas.

Then the ActBlue donation is to a Thomas Crooks with the street address registered to Matthew Crooks.

So the idea that the donation was from some other Thomas Crooks seems unlikely, no?

Unless there's some unmentioned Thomas Crooks that was living in the house Jan 2021.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

Lots of noise right now. Dont have a source past a random comment, so doubt is warranted.

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
640 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19118 readers
2452 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS