427
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by JonsJava@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

WHAT

  • Former U.S. President Donald J. Trump was shot at a rally in PA.

TRUMPS STATEMENT

“I want to thank The United States Secret Service, and all of Law Enforcement, for their rapid response on the shooting that just took place in Butler, Pennsylvania. Most importantly, I want to extend my condolences to the family of the person at the Rally who was killed, and also to the family of another person that was badly injured. It is incredible that such an act can take place in our Country. Nothing is known at this time about the shooter, who is now dead. I was shot with a bullet that pierced the upper part of my right ear. I knew immediately that something was wrong in that I heard a whizzing sound, shots, and immediately felt the bullet ripping through the skin. Much bleeding took place, so I realized then what was happening. GOD BLESS AMERICA!”

WHAT WE THINK WE KNOW SO FAR

  • gunman is dead
  • Trump "is fine"
  • one attendee is dead
  • another attendee is in critical condition

News Sources

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PanoptiDon@lemmy.world 53 points 9 months ago

I bet there will be a retaliatory attack on his Biden

[-] baronvonj@lemmy.world 39 points 9 months ago

at least. and Kamala just because she's a black woman.

[-] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 9 months ago

Why take a chance on Biden getting replaced with a good candidate?

[-] retrospectology@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I mean, the right is already committing violence against its enemies, the media just fails to report it as what it is. Instead it's "lone wolves" and "mental health problems". Rittenhouse literally shot people on camera and got away with it "because skateboard".

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Daniel Perry murdered someone after driving his car into a crowd and was pardoned because Abbott agreed with his politics.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Garrett_Foster

The right is perfectly fine with violence that supports them.

[-] retrospectology@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

The fact that he claimed self-defense really goes to show how far the MAGA attitude of being "victimized" goes. Literally plows his car into a crowd of people and then claims self-defense when shooting someone.

[-] daltotron@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

well to be fair it's not unusual to get away scot free after murdering people with your car, that shit happens all the time

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

He didn't murder anyone with his car. He drove into a crowd then shot someone.

[-] SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

I doubt it. Something like this already happened before in 2017. A deranged Bernie supporter went to a congressional baseball game and tried to shoot as many Republicans as he could. He ended up killing 6 people. However, despite that, there were no reactionary shootings. It was an isolated incident. I think this will be the same, or at least I hope.

[-] retrospectology@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

You do realize the Las Vegas shooting was literally like 3 months later, right?

[-] SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

We literally have no idea what Stephen Paddock's motivation was. The Las Vegas shooting was not a reaction to the congressional shooting

[-] retrospectology@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Read your first sentence, then read your second sentence. Then do it again a few more times, and then ask yourself why I would listen to anything you say?

[-] SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

There's nothing wrong with what I said. You can't give criminals motives nor can you give different crimes connections based on your personal opinions. The matter of fact here is that despite numerous investigations, we still don't know why the Las Vegas shooter did what he did. If evidences surfaces that he was indeed motivated and inspired by the congressional shooting that happened shortly prior then we can establish such a connection, but until that happens we can't.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Please don't repeat the names of mass shooters.

[-] SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I disagree, I think their names should be known and their crimes studied. We can't erase what they did, nor should we. We have to discuss and research these fucked up individuals otherwise how are we going to come up with a solution for the root cause of the issue?

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Study them, yes. But that doesn't require making their names and faces commonplace. Most research is done without broadcasting people's names and faces to the world. Heck - when I was doing analysis for HHS I wasn't given anybody's name or picture at all.

Some of these killers are seeking fame and attention, and by giving it to them we encourage others.

[-] SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

That is a fair point, I'll keep that in mind.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

But giving infamy to that Brock rapist guy is okay right? Just double checking.

Didn't get change his name recently? The rapist guy named Brock or something?

[-] tamal3@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

With the number of shootings that happen in the US... Pointing out a seemingly unrelated incident that occurred months later is ridiculous cherry picking.

this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
427 points (100.0% liked)

News

28764 readers
3525 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS