420
Antinatalism Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 5 months ago by BluJay320 to c/196
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Katrisia@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago

Oh! That's a complicated consequence, yes. I cannot lie and say that studying sad things won't ever make one sad. It's... hard.

I don't think it is a rule that it is going to warp one's vision, but I've seen people getting depressed and definitely biased when studying philosophical pessimism. It seems like something that only happens in jokes or memes, but no, reading Arthur Schopenhauer or whoever can be dangerous if one is already vulnerable to depression, isolation, etc.

I definitely advise discretion. And it's not because they're dark monsters, monks of death dressed in black robes. There's nothing too morbid about the books; that's probably just the myth time has created around them. In reality, their danger is just pondering on dark aspects of life that can be disheartening if one is not prepared. Even when the reading is for high school or university, or for curiosity, I think these authors should be picked with an open mind and a serene "heart".

Thank you for reading and answering.

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
420 points (100.0% liked)

196

16714 readers
2539 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS