420

Antinatalism Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

submitted 5 months ago by BluJay320 to c/196

306 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] sexy_peach@beehaw.org 42 points 5 months ago

I believed this once, but then I went to therapy. People have thrived under way worse conditions.

[-] androogee@midwest.social 23 points 5 months ago

I'm more worried about the reefs thriving

[-] sexy_peach@beehaw.org 9 points 5 months ago

Me too

[-] KyuubiNoKitsune 10 points 5 months ago

Then not having kids is one of the best things you can do.

[-] sexy_peach@beehaw.org 17 points 5 months ago

I am not willing to sacrifice having children. It's an integral part of life for me. Killing myself would probably be good for the climate as well.

[-] KyuubiNoKitsune 7 points 5 months ago

Less good than not having children. But we are all free to make our own choices, but I don't think that you can seriously hold both "I care about the environment" and "I'm choosing to bring life into the world and damage the environment" ideas in your head without a lot of hypocrisy.

I know you may think, my one kid won't have such a big impact on the environment, but when 7 billion think that, the problem is exponential.

[-] mobius_slip@beehaw.org 3 points 5 months ago

To be human is to hold contradicting understandings of reality in equal measure. The amount of people who hate the idea of animal cruelty (or environmental destruction for that matter), yet still consume animal products is astronomical.

The environment will never be saved by trying to convince people to not have kids. It's a biological staple of existence stretching back billions of years, and we as a species will never give that up.

Having children gives us a species a more personal stake in the planet's future, and it would be better to focus our energies on that angle instead of demonizing people who agree with you 95% of the time.