1327
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] art@lemmy.world 104 points 6 months ago

Biden has made significant progress for the average person during his presidency, which is disheartening given the potential for even greater impact. It seems he knows that simply meeting basic expectations will be enough to outdo previous leaders.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 110 points 6 months ago

Significant progress is disheartening. Ok.

Tough room.

[-] zeekaran@sopuli.xyz 55 points 6 months ago

Lemmy is full of those childish people I met in college.

[-] Kit 42 points 6 months ago

I suspect it's also full of foreign agents acting on bad motives. That and children for whom this is their first election, who are caught up on ideals instead of slow and steady progress.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Agreed. Many appear to be attending foreign colleges which . . . well, makes sense, sort of.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago

We are now faced with the fact that tomorrow is today. We are confronted with the fierce urgency of now. In this unfolding conundrum of life and history, there "is" such a thing as being too late. This is no time for apathy or complacency. This is a time for vigorous and positive action.

  • MLK Jr

Our climate is being destroyed irrevocably, wealth inequality is at record levels, and our corrupt government is completely up for sale and unwilling to represent the people. Corporate-run America is in a death spiral, and geriatric neoliberals are leading the charge. Foreign agents would tell Americans to slowly and steadily continue down this ruinous path as the rest of the world leaves us behind. But red blooded Americans understand how this isn’t sustainable for any length of time. Gradual incrementalism is a far cry from our salvation.

[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

I wawnt ever thang I wawnt. If it isint all I wawnt it isint gud enuff.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

This is literally how moderate Democrat voters are and you all tell us to cater to them in every single election.

[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I dawnt unnerstand. Wat u meen?

[-] something_random_tho@lemmy.world 37 points 6 months ago

Now give me single payer healthcare/Medicare for All, and I'll be a happy camper.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 54 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

We need more Democrats in Congress for that. A third of the Senate and all of the House are up for election in November. Attendance at the polls is crucial for down-ballot candidates just the same as presidential.

Vote in November, or be ready to accept what a Republican President, Congress, and SCOTUS decide for you.

[-] meep_launcher@lemm.ee 13 points 6 months ago

The thing that stinks is

A) the electoral college makes it so only 4 or 5 states really matter

B) there's an amnesia about trump from the never trump republicans. My dad is conservative but didn't vote trump. He thought he was an asshole. Now my dad talks about how Biden is crooked, and the only reason people hate trump is because, and his words, "orange man bad".

C) puritanical leftists have valid reasons to not like Biden, but they are willing to blow up the system as they always have. I say puritanical because I know there are pragmatic leftists who exercise restraint in their actions.

In 2020, the suburban vote was a critical win for Biden. I'm hoping for the best, but I'm starting to sit with the fact that Trump has a decent, if not likely, chance of winning in 2020.

[-] Wahots@pawb.social 16 points 6 months ago

C) is the one that is gonna be the razor's edge on this stuff. Reasonable people will vote for Biden, but it's the people that don't feel like voting will matter or people who are dying on the hill of a single issue who are potentially going to fuck us and the entire rest of the world by not voting.

I plan on voting for Biden because it's the right thing to do for all Americans and our allies, and I really don't want to be a tailgunner if Trump breaks up NATO and all the men get drafted for a world war to save Europe or Asia-Pacific again. Preventing assholes domestically and abroad from destroying peaceful countries would be nice.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

is the one that is gonna be the razor’s edge on this stuff. Reasonable people will vote for Biden

Funny, because whenever we say "Biden should have done Y not X" you all say "If he hadn't then moderate democrats and some Republicans won't vote for him." They vote for him because they get what they want. Yet somehow we're unreasonable when we refuse to vote for him when we don't get what we want.

You're trying to hold leftists to a higher standard and it's bullshit.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It’s the exact same standard. Do you really think all votes for Trump are going to be from supporters? Most will be from Republicans who don’t want a Democratic President.

There’s a saying- Democrats need to fall in love, Republicans need to fall in line. It’s that mentality of inaction that causes us to regress as a nation every time a Republican takes office.

In response, Democratic candidates move closer to center to capture more of the active voters, having the exact opposite effect that is intended by abstention.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

The Electoral College has nothing to do with congressional elections.

The rest of your points can be addressed by providing information to those who are misinformed or disenfranchised. Abstaining may not be a vote for Trump, but it’s a refusal to stand in his way.

[-] meep_launcher@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago

Right they're talking about Congress. There's still issues with districting though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

We need more Democrats in Congress for that. A third of the Senate and all of the House are up for election in November. Attendance at the polls is crucial for down-ballot candidates just the same as presidential.

What guarantees can you give us they won't "fumble" the ball like they did during Obama's presidency? If they do will you finally acknowledge the fucking problem?

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

There’s none, other than the guarantee that Republicans will take the ball as far as they can in the opposite direction if we don’t vote. When was the last time a team won a game by walking off the field?

[-] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago

Man! I love when people reduce the nuanced complexities of modern politics to a team sport. That's just such a great way to reframe any issue to an us or them context.

And, when you get right down to it, that's really what this world needs: more acceptance and enforcement of norms that pit half of us against the other half.

Ah! Progress!

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

I agree that polarization is a real problem. The only reason I continued to use the analogy from the previous commenter was to maintain consistency in conversation.

However, there are only two parties that are capable of winning this election. Believing otherwise is distraction, not progress.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 35 points 6 months ago

He can't do that.

People keep saying the things Biden have been doing are weak, half measures, but they have no idea what he's actually capable of doing without Congress.

He literally tried to wipe away a significant amount of student debt. He tried to fulfill that promise without Congress. The Supreme Court stopped it.

[-] greenskye@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago

Honestly I think the entirety of the last 10 years of complete government failure should be tied back to the almost totally non-functional legislature.

The president can't pass laws. The supreme court would matter far less, if we weren't trying to creatively reinterpret ancient laws and applying them to technology and culture that didn't even exist at the time they were written. Instead of updating and clarifying any of those laws, the supreme court has been allowed to effectively make policy by continually shifting interpretations of a static and obsolete set of laws that Congress should have updated 20 years ago. Several times courts have effectively changed policy by saying 'the law doesn't mean that, go write an actual law for that, don't just make shit up' and then Congress just doesn't react at all.

If you look back at history, constitutional amendments were relatively regular up until recently. Can anyone imagine our current government passing an amendment for anything at all? Even the most minor tweak would be impossible in this Congress. Several of our major 'wins' were mere court cases and like we found out with abortion, what the court gives, the court can take away. Anything about our current day to day life that exists solely based on a court ruling we should be fighting to codify into law, but we all seem to recognize how futile that task is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Funny how often Democrats try to do things that will definitely fail but then with things they actually can change there's always some bullshit excuse.

We don't have medicare for all or something similar because Democrats refused to make it happen during Obama's term. That combined with the kid gloves they took to the financial sector during the financial crisis disillusioned a lot of people. Most Democrat politicians are corrupt pro-corporate trash.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 3 points 6 months ago

The bullshit appointed Supreme Court.

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 36 points 6 months ago

which is disheartening given the potential for even greater impact

What potential? Without Congress or the Supreme Court, what potential things could Biden be doing that would have "greater" impact that he isn't doing?

Something that doesn't require a new law, and won't be shot down by a hostile conservative court?

Please give me examples.

[-] rdyoung@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They can't give you any examples and neither can the dorkuses downvoting you. Biden has accomplished a lot with the maggats playing the "I don't wanna" game whenever a dem is in office. He not only had to dig us out of the hole the orange menace left us in, he also has to cure cancer, be the first human to step on Mars, etc and even then people will find something to bitch about.

With any luck (and a lot of hard work) we will have Biden for a second term and then a dem to replace him in 2028 so at least 12 years of the adults running things. Then maybe we can get some shit done and stop trying to tread water at best.

[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 11 points 6 months ago

Biden could fix everything and walk on water and they'd still hate for some bullshit that isn't true or above their room temp iq.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

and then a dem to replace him in 2028

HRC will win the primaries in 2028 and we'll be having the same argument we're having now. Pro-corporate trash isn't doing the trick.

[-] Zorque@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

Without Congress or the Supreme Court

Pretty sure the potential lies in changing this.

Vote. Not just for president, but for every office you're able to. Because this shit isn't just "Trump did it!" or "Biden didn't do enough!" It's also the legislators, and a lot of the judiciary they approved (and probably pushed during the Trump administration). Not to mention all the state and local reps that initiate most of the policies that affect people.

[-] greenskye@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago

It basically all starts with Congress. We could fix so much shit if we ever managed to get a real majority (not 48 Dems and two 'not technically Republicans')

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] art@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

Maybe we could start by not aiding a genocide? Just spitballing here...

[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 10 points 6 months ago

I'm just glad he's not using a sharpie to write "finish them" on bombs instead of pushing for a cease fire.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

You mean the bombs Biden shipped to Israel? Did the sharpie make them extra deadly or something?

Lol bud all Biden's "resistance" to Bibi is going to disappear the moment the election results come in. And you'll still defend Biden anyway.

[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

He could get caught trying.

He could frame a big-picture vision of what he and Democrats value, expressed in terms that speak to Americans emotionally. He could push for policies that Republicans and the Supreme Kangaroo Court will shoot down, and then go to the American people and blame them for taking away good things that everybody wants.

The student-loan debt relief effort had about 1 1/2 of those things. The rest of the time he tends to talk about particular bills and policies. Republicans can stop those, and those things become dead letters, but dreams and hopes are evergreen.

[-] Strykker@programming.dev 6 points 6 months ago

It takes immense amounts of time and effort to bring new items like this forwards, so each item you choose to do means time and money that can't be used bringing a different policy forwards.

Based on that why should Biden waste his time developing and bringing forward policies that the Republicans are obviously going to immediately shoot down, it just prevents him from being able to work on things that might actually get passed

[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 6 points 6 months ago

No, it really doesn't. I can think them up by the dozens. If they're not going to pass, there's no reason to lay all the groundwork. But they're still good for rhetorical purposes.

[-] papertowels@lemmy.one 6 points 6 months ago
[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 4 points 6 months ago

How? Or, why does it matter? It's not going to pass the House.

[-] papertowels@lemmy.one 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Because any president doing this immediately comes across as a 5 year old pretending to have a magic wand.

I'm looking at the list of a dozen items you made - you can't just say "I want this" and not have a detailed plan for how it's meant to be executed - where the money comes from, what effects it's expected to have, etc.

When you are proposing legislation that you know won't be able to be made into law, you're just virtue signaling since even you believe there's no real-world impact. People are even frustrated with Bidens attempts as they are - I've definitely read frustrated comments here talking about how Bidens approach to relieving student debt is so poorly thought out that nobody will actually benefit.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Strykker@programming.dev 5 points 6 months ago

Sure you can think up the tag line line liner title for each item but what about all the details? How will they work the restrictions the requirements the funding. How much of that requires large amounts of work just to be shutdown and tossed by the Republicans

[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 3 points 6 months ago

This is why Democrats struggle so badly, so I'll say it straight up: It's about sales. Reich is complaining that the public doesn't lose its shit over arcane policy details. Yeah, sit down for this truth bomb (/s): That's human nature. It's not fair. It's not right. It's not good. It's just the way it is. Complaining about it won't help, or change the content of headlines.

So somebody asks for examples of what can Biden do when he's blocked by Congress? I say: Sell, sell, sell. Get in the PR game. Put on a show that the people in the cheap seats can enjoy. (That is a metaphor for a rhetorical spectacle that even politically unengaged citizens will hear about.) Show everybody that the problem is in Congress.

What do the details matter? The headline is all that people will hear, and Republicans will block it, anyway. He needs to sell the perception that Democrats are trying. The details can come later, after they get the votes.

[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 3 points 6 months ago

Dozens? Off the top of your head? Name a dozen, for science.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 months ago

Shame on you for saying that! I'm sure you'll be downvoted.

He's boring and uninspirational and isn't accomplishing anything of note... but you should not question any of that!

Just rah-rah until defeated, and repeat.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

But don't you think getting the 10 commandments in our classrooms will make things soo much better? 🙃

[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 7 points 6 months ago

Calling mr 34 felonies a leader is a bit of a stretch.

[-] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Leading us to our doom is a type of leadership, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
1327 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2020 readers
469 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS