57

A long form response to the concerns and comments and general principles many people had in the post about authors suing companies creating LLMs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Gumby@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago

I think this has to do with intent. If I read a book to use it for the basis of a play, that would be illegal. If I read for enjoyment, that is legal. Since AI does not read for enjoyment, but only to use it for the basis of creating something else, that would be illegal.

Is my logic flawed?

[-] Mutoid@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

"Reading with intent?" that sounds ridiculous. The only thing of concern is the work produced.

load more comments (7 replies)
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
57 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37705 readers
166 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS